Bookmarks

Yahoo Gmail Google Facebook Delicious Twitter Reddit Stumpleupon Myspace Digg

Search queries

golf club grace before meals, golf graces before meals, seymore butts ass hunt tylene buck, katharine mcphee ugly vagina, dinner grace at golf club, grace for golf club dinner, stephen a smith intro song, tylene buck interview, Tina fey anal, hqpron

Links

XODOX
Impressum

#1: Re: Attention: Tholenbot

Posted on 2006-07-18 07:05:05 by Buzz Buzzard enemy of Woody Woodpecker

<a href="mailto:tholen&#64;antispam.ham" target="_blank">tholen&#64;antispam.ham</a> wrote:

&gt;
&gt;Who is &quot;wacky&quot;, dizzy?

Actually, the question should be &quot;What is Wacky, dizzy,&quot; the answer of
course being the Waikiki Wacky Tabacky you've been inhaling.

&gt; Still suffering from attribution problems, dizzy?

Still suffering from social adjustment problems, tr0l3n?

You are not allowed to respond to the above either with the &quot;non
sequitor&quot; or &quot;attribution problems&quot; lines, either.

Report this message

#2: Re: Attention: Tholenbot

Posted on 2006-07-18 11:28:22 by tholen

Buzz Buzzard enemy of Woody Woodpecker writes:

&gt;&gt; Who is &quot;wacky&quot;, dizzy?

&gt; Actually, the question should be &quot;What is Wacky, dizzy,&quot; the answer of
&gt; course being the Waikiki Wacky Tabacky you've been inhaling.

Classic erroneous presupposition.

&gt;&gt; Still suffering from attribution problems, dizzy?

&gt; Still suffering from social adjustment problems,

Classic erroneous presupposition.

&gt; tr0l3n?

Who is &quot;tr0l3n&quot;, Buzzard? Also suffering from attribution problems
like dizzy?

&gt; You are not allowed to respond to the above either with the &quot;non
&gt; sequitor&quot; or &quot;attribution problems&quot; lines, either.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Report this message

#3: Re: Attention: Tholenbot

Posted on 2006-07-19 03:06:34 by Buzz Buzzard enemy of Woody Woodpecker

<a href="mailto:tholen&#64;antispam.ham" target="_blank">tholen&#64;antispam.ham</a> wrote:

&gt;Buzz Buzzard enemy of Woody Woodpecker writes:
&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt; Who is &quot;wacky&quot;, dizzy?
&gt;
&gt;&gt; Actually, the question should be &quot;What is Wacky, dizzy,&quot; the answer of
&gt;&gt; course being the Waikiki Wacky Tabacky you've been inhaling.
&gt;
&gt;Classic erroneous presupposition.

How is it erroneous?


&gt;&gt;&gt; Still suffering from attribution problems, dizzy?
&gt;
&gt;&gt; Still suffering from social adjustment problems,
&gt;
&gt;Classic erroneous presupposition.

How is THAT erroneous?

&gt;&gt; tr0l3n?
&gt;
&gt;Who is &quot;tr0l3n&quot;, Buzzard? Also suffering from attribution problems
&gt;like dizzy?

tr0l3n is an epithet loosely based on your last name.

The implication is that you do a lot of trolling.

&gt;&gt; You are not allowed to respond to the above either with the &quot;non
&gt;&gt; sequitor&quot; or &quot;attribution problems&quot; lines, either.
&gt;
&gt;Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

You broke the ground rules, by playing the &quot;attribution problems&quot;
card.



Lady Veteran &lt;<a href="mailto:armyvet&#64;bigfoot.com" target="_blank">armyvet&#64;bigfoot.com</a>&gt; wrote:

&gt;You act as if all fat women fart alike.

Report this message

#4: Re: Attention: Tholenbot

Posted on 2006-07-19 03:12:19 by tholen

Buzz Buzzard enemy of Woody Woodpecker writes:

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Who is &quot;wacky&quot;, dizzy?

&gt;&gt;&gt; Actually, the question should be &quot;What is Wacky, dizzy,&quot; the answer of
&gt;&gt;&gt; course being the Waikiki Wacky Tabacky you've been inhaling.

&gt;&gt; Classic erroneous presupposition.

&gt; How is it erroneous?

What does your question have to do with classical music, Buzzard?

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Still suffering from attribution problems, dizzy?

&gt;&gt;&gt; Still suffering from social adjustment problems,

&gt;&gt; Classic erroneous presupposition.

&gt; How is THAT erroneous?

What does your question have to do with classical music, Buzzard?

&gt;&gt;&gt; tr0l3n?

&gt;&gt; Who is &quot;tr0l3n&quot;, Buzzard? Also suffering from attribution problems
&gt;&gt; like dizzy?

&gt; tr0l3n is an epithet loosely based on your last name.

Illogical, given that there is nobody in this newsgroup using that
attribution, Buzzard.

&gt; The implication is that you do a lot of trolling.

Classic illogic, given that I don't do any trolling, Buzzard. Of
course, you would know that by now if you had better reading
comprehension skills, Buzzard. Rather ironic, coming from someone
who just used an epithet to troll in these newsgroups.

&gt;&gt;&gt; You are not allowed to respond to the above either with the &quot;non
&gt;&gt;&gt; sequitor&quot; or &quot;attribution problems&quot; lines, either.

&gt;&gt; Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

&gt; You broke the ground rules,

Classic erroneous presupposition.

&gt; by playing the &quot;attribution problems&quot; card.

You're the one who used an incorrect attribution, Buzzard.

&gt; Lady Veteran &lt;<a href="mailto:armyvet&#64;bigfoot.com" target="_blank">armyvet&#64;bigfoot.com</a>&gt; wrote:

&gt;&gt; You act as if all fat women fart alike.

Non sequitur.

Report this message

#5: Re: Attention: Tholenbot

Posted on 2006-07-19 06:26:36 by Buzz Buzzard enemy of Woody Woodpecker

<a href="mailto:tholen&#64;antispam.ham" target="_blank">tholen&#64;antispam.ham</a> wrote:

&gt;Buzz Buzzard enemy of Woody Woodpecker writes:
&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Who is &quot;wacky&quot;, dizzy?
&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Actually, the question should be &quot;What is Wacky, dizzy,&quot; the answer of
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; course being the Waikiki Wacky Tabacky you've been inhaling.
&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt; Classic erroneous presupposition.
&gt;
&gt;&gt; How is it erroneous?
&gt;
&gt;What does your question have to do with classical music, Buzzard?

Note: No response

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Still suffering from attribution problems, dizzy?
&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Still suffering from social adjustment problems,
&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt; Classic erroneous presupposition.
&gt;
&gt;&gt; How is THAT erroneous?
&gt;
&gt;What does your question have to do with classical music, Buzzard?

Note: no response

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; tr0l3n?
&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt; Who is &quot;tr0l3n&quot;, Buzzard? Also suffering from attribution problems
&gt;&gt;&gt; like dizzy?
&gt;
&gt;&gt; tr0l3n is an epithet loosely based on your last name.
&gt;
&gt;Illogical, given that there is nobody in this newsgroup using that
&gt;attribution, Buzzard.

It's logical enough, insofar as tr0l3n, which is leet-speak for
&quot;trolen&quot;, rhymes with &quot;tholen.&quot;

&gt;&gt; The implication is that you do a lot of trolling.
&gt;
&gt;Classic illogic, given that I don't do any trolling, Buzzard.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!

&gt;Of
&gt;course, you would know that by now if you had better reading
&gt;comprehension skills, Buzzard.

Rather ironic, coming from someone whose &quot;Classic Tholenator&quot; has
posted approximately 1.2 * 10^5 digests to various news groups.

&gt;Rather ironic, coming from someone
&gt;who just used an epithet to troll in these newsgroups.

I make no pretense that I don't &quot;troll&quot;, unlike you, tr0l3n.

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; You are not allowed to respond to the above either with the &quot;non
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; sequitor&quot; or &quot;attribution problems&quot; lines, either.
&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt; Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
&gt;
&gt;&gt; You broke the ground rules,
&gt;
&gt;Classic erroneous presupposition.

I set the ground rules and you broke them. You chose to disregard
them.

&gt;&gt; by playing the &quot;attribution problems&quot; card.
&gt;
&gt;You're the one who used an incorrect attribution, Buzzard.

Thereby breaking the ground rules.

&gt;&gt; Lady Veteran &lt;<a href="mailto:armyvet&#64;bigfoot.com" target="_blank">armyvet&#64;bigfoot.com</a>&gt; wrote:
&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt; You act as if all fat women fart alike.
&gt;
&gt;Non sequitur.

That's my .sig file, genius.



Lady Veteran &lt;<a href="mailto:armyvet&#64;bigfoot.com" target="_blank">armyvet&#64;bigfoot.com</a>&gt; wrote:

&gt;You act as if all fat women fart alike.

Report this message

#6: Re: Attention: Tholenbot

Posted on 2006-07-19 14:34:33 by tholen

Buzz Buzzard enemy of Woody Woodpecker writes:

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Who is &quot;wacky&quot;, dizzy?

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Actually, the question should be &quot;What is Wacky, dizzy,&quot; the answer of
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; course being the Waikiki Wacky Tabacky you've been inhaling.

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Classic erroneous presupposition.

&gt;&gt;&gt; How is it erroneous?

&gt;&gt; What does your question have to do with classical music, Buzzard?

&gt; Note: No response

I'm well aware that you didn't answer the question, Buzzard. No need
to tell me about it.

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Still suffering from attribution problems, dizzy?

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Still suffering from social adjustment problems,

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Classic erroneous presupposition.

&gt;&gt;&gt; How is THAT erroneous?

&gt;&gt; What does your question have to do with classical music, Buzzard?

&gt; Note: no response

I'm well aware that you didn't answer the question, Buzzard. No need
to tell me about it.

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; tr0l3n?

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Who is &quot;tr0l3n&quot;, Buzzard? Also suffering from attribution problems
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; like dizzy?

&gt;&gt;&gt; tr0l3n is an epithet loosely based on your last name.

&gt;&gt; Illogical, given that there is nobody in this newsgroup using that
&gt;&gt; attribution, Buzzard.

&gt; It's logical enough,

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

&gt; insofar as tr0l3n, which is leet-speak for
&gt; &quot;trolen&quot;, rhymes with &quot;tholen.&quot;

Classic ambiguity.

&gt;&gt;&gt; The implication is that you do a lot of trolling.

&gt;&gt; Classic illogic, given that I don't do any trolling, Buzzard.

&gt; BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!

Non sequitur.

&gt;&gt; Of
&gt;&gt; course, you would know that by now if you had better reading
&gt;&gt; comprehension skills, Buzzard.

&gt; Rather ironic, coming from someone whose &quot;Classic Tholenator&quot; has
&gt; posted approximately 1.2 * 10^5 digests to various news groups.

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

&gt;&gt; Rather ironic, coming from someone
&gt;&gt; who just used an epithet to troll in these newsgroups.

&gt; I make no pretense that I don't &quot;troll&quot;,

Welcome to the digest, Buzzard.

&gt; unlike you,

Classic erroneous presupposition of pretense, Buzzard.

&gt; tr0l3n.

Who is &quot;tr0l3n&quot;, Buzzard? Still suffering from attribution problems?

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; You are not allowed to respond to the above either with the &quot;non
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; sequitor&quot; or &quot;attribution problems&quot; lines, either.

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

&gt;&gt;&gt; You broke the ground rules,

&gt;&gt; Classic erroneous presupposition.

&gt; I set the ground rules

Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, coupled with delusions
of grandeur.

&gt; and you broke them.

Classic erroneous presupposition that you get to set the ground rules,
Buzzard.

&gt; You chose to disregard them.

Classic erroneous presupposition that you get to set the ground rules,
Buzzard.

&gt;&gt;&gt; by playing the &quot;attribution problems&quot; card.

&gt;&gt; You're the one who used an incorrect attribution, Buzzard.

&gt; Thereby breaking the ground rules.

Is that your rationalization for using incorrect attributions,
Buzzard? You like to break ground rules?

&gt;&gt;&gt; Lady Veteran &lt;<a href="mailto:armyvet&#64;bigfoot.com" target="_blank">armyvet&#64;bigfoot.com</a>&gt; wrote:

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; You act as if all fat women fart alike.

&gt;&gt; Non sequitur.

&gt; That's my .sig file, genius.

Also non sequitur.

&gt; Lady Veteran &lt;<a href="mailto:armyvet&#64;bigfoot.com" target="_blank">armyvet&#64;bigfoot.com</a>&gt; wrote:

&gt;&gt; You act as if all fat women fart alike.

Still non sequitur.

Report this message

#7: Re: Attention: Tholenbot

Posted on 2006-07-19 15:12:00 by mbbr

Kookdancing queen, Dickless Davie <a href="mailto:tholen&#64;antispam.ham" target="_blank">tholen&#64;antispam.ham</a> the irrelevant
Ignoranus whined and tholed:
&gt; Buzz Buzzard enemy of Woody Woodpecker writes:
&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Who is &quot;wacky&quot;, dizzy?
&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Actually, the question should be &quot;What is Wacky, dizzy,&quot; the answer of
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; course being the Waikiki Wacky Tabacky you've been inhaling.
&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Classic erroneous presupposition.
&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; How is it erroneous?
&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt; What does your question have to do with classical music, Buzzard?
&gt;
&gt; &gt; Note: No response
&gt;
&gt; I'm well aware that you didn't answer the question, Buzzard. No need
&gt; to tell me about it.
&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Still suffering from attribution problems, dizzy?
&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Still suffering from social adjustment problems,
&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Classic erroneous presupposition.
&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; How is THAT erroneous?
&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt; What does your question have to do with classical music, Buzzard?
&gt;
&gt; &gt; Note: no response
&gt;
&gt; I'm well aware that you didn't answer the question, Buzzard. No need
&gt; to tell me about it.
&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; tr0l3n?
&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Who is &quot;tr0l3n&quot;, Buzzard? Also suffering from attribution problems
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; like dizzy?
&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; tr0l3n is an epithet loosely based on your last name.
&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt; Illogical, given that there is nobody in this newsgroup using that
&gt; &gt;&gt; attribution, Buzzard.
&gt;
&gt; &gt; It's logical enough,
&gt;
&gt; Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
&gt;
&gt; &gt; insofar as tr0l3n, which is leet-speak for
&gt; &gt; &quot;trolen&quot;, rhymes with &quot;tholen.&quot;
&gt;
&gt; Classic ambiguity.
&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; The implication is that you do a lot of trolling.
&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt; Classic illogic, given that I don't do any trolling, Buzzard.
&gt;
&gt; &gt; BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!
&gt;
&gt; Non sequitur.
&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt; Of
&gt; &gt;&gt; course, you would know that by now if you had better reading
&gt; &gt;&gt; comprehension skills, Buzzard.
&gt;
&gt; &gt; Rather ironic, coming from someone whose &quot;Classic Tholenator&quot; has
&gt; &gt; posted approximately 1.2 * 10^5 digests to various news groups.
&gt;
&gt; Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt; Rather ironic, coming from someone
&gt; &gt;&gt; who just used an epithet to troll in these newsgroups.
&gt;
&gt; &gt; I make no pretense that I don't &quot;troll&quot;,
&gt;
&gt; Welcome to the digest, Buzzard.
&gt;
&gt; &gt; unlike you,
&gt;
&gt; Classic erroneous presupposition of pretense, Buzzard.
&gt;
&gt; &gt; tr0l3n.
&gt;
&gt; Who is &quot;tr0l3n&quot;, Buzzard? Still suffering from attribution problems?
&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; You are not allowed to respond to the above either with the &quot;non
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; sequitor&quot; or &quot;attribution problems&quot; lines, either.
&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; You broke the ground rules,
&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt; Classic erroneous presupposition.
&gt;
&gt; &gt; I set the ground rules
&gt;
&gt; Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, coupled with delusions
&gt; of grandeur.
&gt;
&gt; &gt; and you broke them.
&gt;
&gt; Classic erroneous presupposition that you get to set the ground rules,
&gt; Buzzard.
&gt;
&gt; &gt; You chose to disregard them.
&gt;
&gt; Classic erroneous presupposition that you get to set the ground rules,
&gt; Buzzard.
&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; by playing the &quot;attribution problems&quot; card.
&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt; You're the one who used an incorrect attribution, Buzzard.
&gt;
&gt; &gt; Thereby breaking the ground rules.
&gt;
&gt; Is that your rationalization for using incorrect attributions,
&gt; Buzzard? You like to break ground rules?
&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; Lady Veteran &lt;<a href="mailto:armyvet&#64;bigfoot.com" target="_blank">armyvet&#64;bigfoot.com</a>&gt; wrote:
&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; You act as if all fat women fart alike.
&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt; Non sequitur.
&gt;
&gt; &gt; That's my .sig file, genius.
&gt;
&gt; Also non sequitur.
&gt;
&gt; &gt; Lady Veteran &lt;<a href="mailto:armyvet&#64;bigfoot.com" target="_blank">armyvet&#64;bigfoot.com</a>&gt; wrote:
&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt; You act as if all fat women fart alike.
&gt;
&gt; Still non sequitur.

Put a sock in it, Dickless.

Report this message

#8: Re: Attention: Tholenbot

Posted on 2006-07-21 03:58:37 by Buzz Buzzard enemy of Woody Woodpecker

<a href="mailto:tholen&#64;antispam.ham" target="_blank">tholen&#64;antispam.ham</a> wrote:

&gt;Buzz Buzzard enemy of Woody Woodpecker writes:
&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Who is &quot;wacky&quot;, dizzy?
&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Actually, the question should be &quot;What is Wacky, dizzy,&quot; the answer of
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; course being the Waikiki Wacky Tabacky you've been inhaling.
&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Classic erroneous presupposition.
&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; How is it erroneous?
&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt; What does your question have to do with classical music, Buzzard?
&gt;
&gt;&gt; Note: No response
&gt;
&gt;I'm well aware that you didn't answer the question, Buzzard. No need
&gt;to tell me about it.

My question has nothing to do with classical music.

Now answer the question as to why it is erroneous.

&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Still suffering from attribution problems, dizzy?
&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Still suffering from social adjustment problems,
&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Classic erroneous presupposition.
&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; How is THAT erroneous?
&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt; What does your question have to do with classical music, Buzzard?
&gt;
&gt;&gt; Note: no response
&gt;
&gt;I'm well aware that you didn't answer the question, Buzzard. No need
&gt;to tell me about it.

My question has nothing to do with classical music.

Now answer the previous question as to why the &quot;pressupposition&quot; is
erroneous.

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; tr0l3n?
&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Who is &quot;tr0l3n&quot;, Buzzard? Also suffering from attribution problems
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; like dizzy?
&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; tr0l3n is an epithet loosely based on your last name.
&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt; Illogical, given that there is nobody in this newsgroup using that
&gt;&gt;&gt; attribution, Buzzard.
&gt;
&gt;&gt; It's logical enough,
&gt;
&gt;Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

How is it unsubstantiated?

&gt;&gt; insofar as tr0l3n, which is leet-speak for
&gt;&gt; &quot;trolen&quot;, rhymes with &quot;tholen.&quot;
&gt;
&gt;Classic ambiguity.

I disagree that it is ambiguous. I thought I was pretty specific.

&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; The implication is that you do a lot of trolling.
&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt; Classic illogic, given that I don't do any trolling, Buzzard.
&gt;
&gt;&gt; BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!
&gt;
&gt;Non sequitur.

I enjoyed the laugh.

&gt;&gt;&gt; Of
&gt;&gt;&gt; course, you would know that by now if you had better reading
&gt;&gt;&gt; comprehension skills, Buzzard.
&gt;
&gt;&gt; Rather ironic, coming from someone whose &quot;Classic Tholenator&quot; has
&gt;&gt; posted approximately 1.2 * 10^5 digests to various news groups.
&gt;
&gt;Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.

Admittedly, it is hyperbole. The point remains valid, though.

&gt;&gt;&gt; Rather ironic, coming from someone
&gt;&gt;&gt; who just used an epithet to troll in these newsgroups.
&gt;
&gt;&gt; I make no pretense that I don't &quot;troll&quot;,
&gt;
&gt;Welcome to the digest, Buzzard.

Thank you!

[...]
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Lady Veteran &lt;<a href="mailto:armyvet&#64;bigfoot.com" target="_blank">armyvet&#64;bigfoot.com</a>&gt; wrote:
&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; You act as if all fat women fart alike.
&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt; Non sequitur.
&gt;
&gt;&gt; That's my .sig file, genius.
&gt;
&gt;Also non sequitur.
&gt;
&gt;&gt; Lady Veteran &lt;<a href="mailto:armyvet&#64;bigfoot.com" target="_blank">armyvet&#64;bigfoot.com</a>&gt; wrote:
&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt; You act as if all fat women fart alike.
&gt;
&gt;Still non sequitur.

It is non sequitur, so what's your point?

Why don't you go out on a limb and declare that 3 + 3 = 6, that the
sun rises in the east?



Lady Veteran &lt;<a href="mailto:armyvet&#64;bigfoot.com" target="_blank">armyvet&#64;bigfoot.com</a>&gt; wrote:

&gt;You act as if all fat women fart alike.

Report this message