| clerks II [message #1098159] |
Fri, 21 July 2006 21:03 |
|
similar to the first one - about half of it is godawful, about 1/3 is
mediocre, but about 1/5 is transcendent, and thus worth enduring the
other 4/5 for.
--
people invoke Natural Law when they wish to get
their way without having to argue for it.
- Jeremy Bentham
|
|
|
| Re: clerks II [message #1098170 ] |
Fri, 21 July 2006 21:15 |
|
[ Fri, 21 Jul 2006 14:03:50 -0500 ]
[ stephenj | sjek [at] cox.net ]
[ <ry9wg.12207$PO.4654 [at] dukeread03> ]
:similar to the first one - about half of it is godawful, about 1/3 is
:mediocre, but about 1/5 is transcendent, and thus worth enduring the
:other 4/5 for.
BOO STINKY MATH BAIT!
HOORAY BEER!
--
Bryan S. Slick, onyx_hokie at yahoo dot com
"Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent."
(Salvor Hardin in 'Foundation', Isaac Asimov)
|
|
|
| Re: clerks II [message #1098176 ] |
Fri, 21 July 2006 21:35 |
|
stephenj wrote:
> similar to the first one - about half of it is godawful, about 1/3 is
> mediocre, but about 1/5 is transcendent, and thus worth enduring the
> other 4/5 for.
Try not to suck any more dicks.
|
|
|
| Re: clerks II [message #1098215 ] |
Fri, 21 July 2006 22:34 |
|
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:15:35 -0400, Bryan S. Slick wrote:
> [ Fri, 21 Jul 2006 14:03:50 -0500 ]
> [ stephenj | sjek [at] cox.net ]
> [ <ry9wg.12207$PO.4654 [at] dukeread03> ]
>
> :similar to the first one - about half of it is godawful, about 1/3 is
> :mediocre, but about 1/5 is transcendent, and thus worth enduring the
> :other 4/5 for.
>
> BOO STINKY MATH BAIT!
>
> HOORAY BEER!
Don't understand the word 'about'?
Carl Lundstedt
UNL
|
|
|
| Re: clerks II [message #1098249 ] |
Fri, 21 July 2006 23:32 |
|
Bryan S. Slick <onyx_hokie [at] yahoo.cem> writes:
> [ stephenj | sjek [at] cox.net ]
>
> :similar to the first one - about half of it is godawful, about 1/3 is
> :mediocre, but about 1/5 is transcendent, and thus worth enduring the
> :other 4/5 for.
>
> BOO STINKY MATH BAIT!
>
> HOORAY BEER!
MATH 15 HARD S0 1 GUES5 1 CANUT G0 SE3 THAT M0V13!! [at] !!
--Ralph Kennedy {ames,gatech,husc6,rutgers}!ncar!noao!asuvax!kennedy
{allegra,decvax,ihnp4,oddjob}--^
^---------------The Wrong Choice
internet: kennedy [at] asuvax.eas.asu.edu
|
|
|
| Re: clerks II [message #1098555 ] |
Sun, 23 July 2006 04:12 |
|
Quiet, Carl Lundstedt <clundst [at] workstation.unl.edu> -- I'm transmitting
rage.
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 15:15:35 -0400, Bryan S. Slick wrote:
>
>> [ Fri, 21 Jul 2006 14:03:50 -0500 ]
>> [ stephenj | sjek [at] cox.net ]
>> [ <ry9wg.12207$PO.4654 [at] dukeread03> ]
>>
>> :similar to the first one - about half of it is godawful, about 1/3 is
>> :mediocre, but about 1/5 is transcendent, and thus worth enduring the
>> :other 4/5 for.
>>
>> BOO STINKY MATH BAIT!
>>
>> HOORAY BEER!
>
> Don't understand the word 'about'?
>
> Carl Lundstedt
> UNL
>
>
I understand it means someone can't figure fractions.
--
------------------------------------------------------------ ------------
James Schrumpf http://www.hilltopper.net
Play like your couch is on fire!
|
|
|
| Re: clerks II [message #1098725 ] |
Sun, 23 July 2006 21:36 |
|
stephenj <sjek [at] cox.net> wrote in news:ry9wg.12207$PO.4654 [at] dukeread03:
> similar to the first one - about half of it is godawful, about 1/3 is
> mediocre, but about 1/5 is transcendent, and thus worth enduring the
> other 4/5 for.
The love story was tolerable. Laughed my ass off at the rest of the movie.
I always thought Randal was the best part of the original Clerks. His rant
on the Lord of the Rings was classic in this one.
|
|
|
