|
Sports » rec.sport.rugby.union » Re: Tonight's Haka
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1071841] |
Mon, 10 July 2006 13:28 |
|
"Mike Thompson" <I [at] dontthinkso> wrote in message
news:44afa3ca$0$25132$afc38c87 [at] news.optusnet.com.au...
>I thought the throat-slitting Haka had caused all sorts of internal strife
>in New Zealand and that it had 'retired' or was going to be re-worked or
>something?
>
> Irrespective, it was nice to see the Wallabies being given the honor of
> such special attention.
Just having a look at the Haka from 30 years ago in the other thread, got me
wondering, nowadays do they do thursday afternoon line dancing day so they
are all synchronised. Can imagine when they introduced that, "Right boys
scrum and linout practice has been cancelled today, you were a bloody
disgrace in the last test, today you have dancing lessons"
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1071847 ] |
Mon, 10 July 2006 14:45 |
|
Ali Day wrote:
> "Mike Thompson" <I [at] dontthinkso> wrote in message
> news:44afa3ca$0$25132$afc38c87 [at] news.optusnet.com.au...
> >I thought the throat-slitting Haka had caused all sorts of internal strife
> >in New Zealand and that it had 'retired' or was going to be re-worked or
> >something?
> >
> > Irrespective, it was nice to see the Wallabies being given the honor of
> > such special attention.
>
> Just having a look at the Haka from 30 years ago in the other thread, got me
> wondering, nowadays do they do thursday afternoon line dancing day so they
> are all synchronised. Can imagine when they introduced that, "Right boys
> scrum and linout practice has been cancelled today, you were a bloody
> disgrace in the last test, today you have dancing lessons"
since the ABs only lose 1-2 games a year they can do whatever they
fucking want you fish fucker :P
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1071867 ] |
Mon, 10 July 2006 16:21 |
|
"fred" <maimail2000 [at] yahoo.co.nz> wrote in message
news:1152535524.555600.293590 [at] b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Ali Day wrote:
>> "Mike Thompson" <I [at] dontthinkso> wrote in message
>> news:44afa3ca$0$25132$afc38c87 [at] news.optusnet.com.au...
>> >I thought the throat-slitting Haka had caused all sorts of internal
>> >strife
>> >in New Zealand and that it had 'retired' or was going to be re-worked or
>> >something?
>> >
>> > Irrespective, it was nice to see the Wallabies being given the honor of
>> > such special attention.
>>
>> Just having a look at the Haka from 30 years ago in the other thread, got
>> me
>> wondering, nowadays do they do thursday afternoon line dancing day so
>> they
>> are all synchronised. Can imagine when they introduced that, "Right boys
>> scrum and linout practice has been cancelled today, you were a bloody
>> disgrace in the last test, today you have dancing lessons"
>
> since the ABs only lose 1-2 games a year they can do whatever they
> fucking want you fish fucker :P
wind yer neck in boy, and leave the abuse to those better suited. Matty step
up please, show the newbie how to do it!
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1071871 ] |
Mon, 10 July 2006 18:47 |
|
Ali Day wrote:
> "fred" <maimail2000 [at] yahoo.co.nz> wrote in message
> >
> > since the ABs only lose 1-2 games a year they can do whatever they
> > fucking want you fish fucker :P
>
> wind yer neck in boy, and leave the abuse to those better suited. Matty step
> up please, show the newbie how to do it!
The haka is a remote piece of maori culture that has been kidnapped and
bastardised beyond all recognition by the ABs as a piece of branding
and as a psyche up tool.
I have no real problem with it, it adds to the spectacle, but I have a
big problem that the opposition are forced by the IRB to have to face
it. As far as I am concerned the ABs and the Islanders should do it for
the cameras and the opposition should be allowed to carry on with their
own preps rather than having to stand thru this uneven psyche up tool.
For any team that I played or coached we would have loved 2 minutes
dedicated to psyching out the opposition (unanswered) right before
kick-off. it would give all teams an advantage.
Besides Its so rooted in Maori culture that the Abs invented a new one
2 years ago with a throat slitting action in it- I suppose other teams
will be accused of not respecting this 'ancient traditional' dance too-
or some other sh*te to that effect.
Let the ABs do their haka but shag off with other teams being forced to
watch it- that is plain biased and unfair - just typically cheater
really.
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1071872 ] |
Mon, 10 July 2006 19:02 |
|
Daithi wrote:
<snip>
>
> Let the ABs do their haka but shag off with other teams being forced to
> watch it- that is plain biased and unfair - just typically cheater
> really.
>
You seem to be making a rather tedious habit of getting on your soapbox
without having your facts correct or your brain engaged.
How about you point out the IRB ruling that *forces* teams to watch the
haka or stop your whining?
Teamns can do whatever they want during that time, although the last
team to turn their back on it and throw a ball around was the Wallabies
in 96.
They got a pasting.
Later,
Sean
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1071877 ] |
Mon, 10 July 2006 20:19 |
|
On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:02:12 +0100, Sean Byrne
<byrne_sean_spamtrap [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>Daithi wrote:
><snip>
>>
>> Let the ABs do their haka but shag off with other teams being forced to
>> watch it- that is plain biased and unfair - just typically cheater
>> really.
>>
>
>You seem to be making a rather tedious habit of getting on your soapbox
>without having your facts correct or your brain engaged.
>
>How about you point out the IRB ruling that *forces* teams to watch the
>haka or stop your whining?
>
>Teamns can do whatever they want during that time, although the last
>team to turn their back on it and throw a ball around was the Wallabies
>in 96.
>
>They got a pasting.
And, fair play to them, have fronted up ever since. It's pragmatism
really - no point making the ABs REALLY angry. They found out the hard
way.
--
greig
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1071880 ] |
Mon, 10 July 2006 21:07 |
|
Greig Blanchett wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:02:12 +0100, Sean Byrne
> <byrne_sean_spamtrap [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Daithi wrote:
> ><snip>
> >>
> >> Let the ABs do their haka but shag off with other teams being forced to
> >> watch it- that is plain biased and unfair - just typically cheater
> >> really.
> >>
> >
> >You seem to be making a rather tedious habit of getting on your soapbox
> >without having your facts correct or your brain engaged.
> >
> >How about you point out the IRB ruling that *forces* teams to watch the
> >haka or stop your whining?
> >
> >Teamns can do whatever they want during that time, although the last
> >team to turn their back on it and throw a ball around was the Wallabies
> >in 96.
> >
> >They got a pasting.
>
> And, fair play to them, have fronted up ever since. It's pragmatism
> really - no point making the ABs REALLY angry. They found out the hard
> way.
Oh jeez.
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1071884 ] |
Mon, 10 July 2006 21:25 |
|
On 10 Jul 2006 12:07:21 -0700, "Mark (newsgroups)"
<marknewsgroups [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
>Greig Blanchett wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:02:12 +0100, Sean Byrne
>> <byrne_sean_spamtrap [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Daithi wrote:
>> ><snip>
>> >>
>> >> Let the ABs do their haka but shag off with other teams being forced to
>> >> watch it- that is plain biased and unfair - just typically cheater
>> >> really.
>> >>
>> >
>> >You seem to be making a rather tedious habit of getting on your soapbox
>> >without having your facts correct or your brain engaged.
>> >
>> >How about you point out the IRB ruling that *forces* teams to watch the
>> >haka or stop your whining?
>> >
>> >Teamns can do whatever they want during that time, although the last
>> >team to turn their back on it and throw a ball around was the Wallabies
>> >in 96.
>> >
>> >They got a pasting.
>>
>> And, fair play to them, have fronted up ever since. It's pragmatism
>> really - no point making the ABs REALLY angry. They found out the hard
>> way.
>
>Oh jeez.
Do you think Jake White will tell his men to use the time creatively
by practising some moves and tossing the ball round, or do you think
he will tell them to stand impassively? Go on ...
--
greig
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1071885 ] |
Tue, 11 July 2006 04:51 |
|
Ali Day wrote:
> "fred" <maimail2000 [at] yahoo.co.nz> wrote in message
> news:1152535524.555600.293590 [at] b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Ali Day wrote:
> >> "Mike Thompson" <I [at] dontthinkso> wrote in message
> >> news:44afa3ca$0$25132$afc38c87 [at] news.optusnet.com.au...
> >> >I thought the throat-slitting Haka had caused all sorts of internal
> >> >strife
> >> >in New Zealand and that it had 'retired' or was going to be re-worked or
> >> >something?
> >> >
> >> > Irrespective, it was nice to see the Wallabies being given the honor of
> >> > such special attention.
> >>
> >> Just having a look at the Haka from 30 years ago in the other thread, got
> >> me
> >> wondering, nowadays do they do thursday afternoon line dancing day so
> >> they
> >> are all synchronised. Can imagine when they introduced that, "Right boys
> >> scrum and linout practice has been cancelled today, you were a bloody
> >> disgrace in the last test, today you have dancing lessons"
> >
> > since the ABs only lose 1-2 games a year they can do whatever they
> > fucking want you fish fucker :P
>
> wind yer neck in boy, and leave the abuse to those better suited. Matty step
> up please, show the newbie how to do it!
awww poor little ali goes crying to her boyfriend
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1071887 ] |
Tue, 11 July 2006 05:00 |
|
rick boyd wrote:
> Greig Blanchett wrote:
>
> > Do you think Jake White will tell his men to use the time creatively
> > by practising some moves and tossing the ball round, or do you think
> > he will tell them to stand impassively? Go on ...
>
> I've got a good idea. How about South Africa runs a series of adverts
> showing a black waitress in a French maid's uniform handing out cups of
> tea to the All Blacks, who are of course all carrying their handbags.
> Perhaps they could work some sheep into it for good measure.
>
> -- rick boyd
it looks like the boks have adopt the convict's training program lol
http://www.rugbyheaven.smh.com.au/articles/2003/11/22/106902 7369654.html
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1071929 ] |
Tue, 11 July 2006 10:59 |
|
Ali Day wrote:
> "fred" <maimail2000 [at] yahoo.co.nz> wrote in message
> news:1152586290.298736.10700 [at] p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > awww poor little ali goes crying to her boyfriend
>
> oh dear, piss poor effort
if it was so bad why did you respond then fish girl?
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1071930 ] |
Tue, 11 July 2006 08:49 |
|
"fred" <maimail2000 [at] yahoo.co.nz> wrote in message
news:1152586290.298736.10700 [at] p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>
> awww poor little ali goes crying to her boyfriend
oh dear, piss poor effort
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1071938 ] |
Tue, 11 July 2006 11:11 |
|
Greig Blanchett wrote:
> On 10 Jul 2006 12:07:21 -0700, "Mark (newsgroups)"
> <marknewsgroups [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >Greig Blanchett wrote:
> >> On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:02:12 +0100, Sean Byrne
> >> <byrne_sean_spamtrap [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Daithi wrote:
> >> ><snip>
> >> >>
> >> >> Let the ABs do their haka but shag off with other teams being forced to
> >> >> watch it- that is plain biased and unfair - just typically cheater
> >> >> really.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >You seem to be making a rather tedious habit of getting on your soapbox
> >> >without having your facts correct or your brain engaged.
> >> >
> >> >How about you point out the IRB ruling that *forces* teams to watch the
> >> >haka or stop your whining?
> >> >
> >> >Teamns can do whatever they want during that time, although the last
> >> >team to turn their back on it and throw a ball around was the Wallabies
> >> >in 96.
> >> >
> >> >They got a pasting.
> >>
> >> And, fair play to them, have fronted up ever since. It's pragmatism
> >> really - no point making the ABs REALLY angry. They found out the hard
> >> way.
> >
> >Oh jeez.
>
> Do you think Jake White will tell his men to use the time creatively
> by practising some moves and tossing the ball round, or do you think
> he will tell them to stand impassively? Go on ...
I for one hope they stand impassively but I'm not Jake and since he
appears to be losing his marbles I have no idea what he'll do. It's not
the fact of making the ABs "REALLY angry" as to just seeming a little
churlish, not to mention how stupid they will look if they go on to get
a pasting as you say.
I didn't mean to be offensive it's just that your comment brought the
image of a loudmouth drunk I saw in a parking lot wanting a fight and
shouting "you're making me REALLY angry and you DON'T want to see me
then".
In any case, why would not fronting up to the Haka make the ABs angry?
It's not for the opposition or the crowds after all, nor is it a pysche
up tool. The ABs only do it for themselves because it's a meaningful
part of their culture. Who cares what the opposition do?
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1071959 ] |
Tue, 11 July 2006 13:07 |
|
Daithi vomited some burley looking for a bite:
Your not Stephen Jones are you?
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1071974 ] |
Tue, 11 July 2006 16:04 |
|
Sean Byrne wrote:
> How about you point out the IRB ruling that *forces* teams to watch the
> haka or stop your whining?
>
> Teamns can do whatever they want during that time, .....usual shite.....
>
> Later,
> Sean
Wrong again Sean-well done- I'd imagine you make a habit of this,
judging by your considerted & informed views, but anyways here's a
little free education and background on the subject for u and other one
eyes.
The Irish stood toe to toe with the All Blacks in Dublin when they were
captained by Willie Anderson (so it must have been circa 1989)- I think
it may have been Wayne Shelfords ABs. Basically the Irish rather than
be intimitated by passively standing by, faced the ABs, linked arms and
then advanced forward as the haka went on so that Willie Anderson the
Irish captain in the middle of the Irish line was basically nose to
nose with Shelford at the end of the psyche up dance. It was gripping
stuff and the crowd absolutely loved it.
Needless to say the NZlanders went on with the usual shite about
disrespecting the Maori heritage, and other blather seen here
occasionally after the game. Anyway following from this and a few other
front ups to the pre match psyche up tools, the IRB made it mandatory
for all teams to line up on their 10 m line to face the prancing blacks
(and other teams dances such as W Samoa, Fiji, etc) on their 10 m.
So yes, although i agree its hard to believe, this psychological
advantage is now enshrined in IRB regulations as to how the game is
run.
I'd say they'd have done the same for Japan if it was them wouldn't
you!?!
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1071975 ] |
Tue, 11 July 2006 16:09 |
|
Greig Blanchett wrote:
>
> And, fair play to them, have fronted up ever since. It's pragmatism
> really - no point making the ABs REALLY angry. They found out the hard
> way.
>
> --
> greig
Its not pragmatism DoDo its regulations as laid down by the IRB. Jeez
Greig I thought with you working at the NZRFU and all that you'd at
least know where yere psyche up advantage right before kick off is
enshrined in regulations!?! Especially considering the NZRFU must have
lobbied hard to get it in there in the first place.
Do you think any captain would have his team passively stand thru that
psyche out stuff if they didn't have to!?!
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1071978 ] |
Tue, 11 July 2006 16:55 |
|
In article <mba5b2d80g6ga0r89o3j1k5m8igcc0cr1a [at] 4ax.com>,
Greig Blanchett <greigb [at] nzrfu.NOSPAM.com> wrote:
> On 10 Jul 2006 12:07:21 -0700, "Mark (newsgroups)"
> <marknewsgroups [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >Greig Blanchett wrote:
> >> On Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:02:12 +0100, Sean Byrne
> >> <byrne_sean_spamtrap [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Daithi wrote:
> >> ><snip>
> >> >>
> >> >> Let the ABs do their haka but shag off with other teams being forced to
> >> >> watch it- that is plain biased and unfair - just typically cheater
> >> >> really.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >You seem to be making a rather tedious habit of getting on your soapbox
> >> >without having your facts correct or your brain engaged.
> >> >
> >> >How about you point out the IRB ruling that *forces* teams to watch the
> >> >haka or stop your whining?
> >> >
> >> >Teamns can do whatever they want during that time, although the last
> >> >team to turn their back on it and throw a ball around was the Wallabies
> >> >in 96.
> >> >
> >> >They got a pasting.
> >>
> >> And, fair play to them, have fronted up ever since. It's pragmatism
> >> really - no point making the ABs REALLY angry. They found out the hard
> >> way.
> >
> >Oh jeez.
>
> Do you think Jake White will tell his men to use the time creatively
> by practising some moves and tossing the ball round, or do you think
> he will tell them to stand impassively? Go on ...
>
> --
> greig
The Jaapies don't have any moves to practice, so what's your point . . ?
William Clark
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1071980 ] |
Tue, 11 July 2006 17:03 |
|
Daithi wrote:
> Sean Byrne wrote:
>
>>How about you point out the IRB ruling that *forces* teams to watch the
>>haka or stop your whining?
>>
>>Teamns can do whatever they want during that time, .....usual shite.....
>>
>>Later,
>>Sean
>
>
> Wrong again Sean-well done- I'd imagine you make a habit of this,
> judging by your considerted & informed views, but anyways here's a
> little free education and background on the subject for u and other one
> eyes.
>
> The Irish stood toe to toe with the All Blacks in Dublin when they were
> captained by Willie Anderson (so it must have been circa 1989)- I think
> it may have been Wayne Shelfords ABs. Basically the Irish rather than
> be intimitated by passively standing by, faced the ABs, linked arms and
> then advanced forward as the haka went on so that Willie Anderson the
> Irish captain in the middle of the Irish line was basically nose to
> nose with Shelford at the end of the psyche up dance. It was gripping
> stuff and the crowd absolutely loved it.
As did I.
Cockerill did something similar as well.
>
> Needless to say the NZlanders went on with the usual shite about
> disrespecting the Maori heritage, and other blather seen here
> occasionally after the game. Anyway following from this and a few other
> front ups to the pre match psyche up tools, the IRB made it mandatory
> for all teams to line up on their 10 m line to face the prancing blacks
> (and other teams dances such as W Samoa, Fiji, etc) on their 10 m.
Cite? www.irb.com should be a good starting place.
>
> So yes, although i agree its hard to believe, this psychological
> advantage is now enshrined in IRB regulations as to how the game is
> run.
Yes it is, considering that the Australians turned their backs and
continued their warmup in 1996. I know that's a big number, so I'll
help you out - it comes AFTER the Willie Anderson incident and the
supposed introduction of this regulation.
>
> I'd say they'd have done the same for Japan if it was them wouldn't
> you!?!
I'd say that either provide a link to the regulation that requires teams
to face the All Blacks or stop your whining.
Later,
Sean
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1071982 ] |
Tue, 11 July 2006 17:05 |
|
Daithi wrote:
> Greig Blanchett wrote:
>
>>And, fair play to them, have fronted up ever since. It's pragmatism
>>really - no point making the ABs REALLY angry. They found out the hard
>>way.
>>
>>--
>>greig
>
>
> Its not pragmatism DoDo its regulations as laid down by the IRB.
All the IRB regulations are online. No mention anywhere that I can see
of this new 10m rule.
Jeez
> Greig I thought with you working at the NZRFU and all that you'd at
> least know where yere psyche up advantage right before kick off is
> enshrined in regulations!?! Especially considering the NZRFU must have
> lobbied hard to get it in there in the first place.
>
> Do you think any captain would have his team passively stand thru that
> psyche out stuff if they didn't have to!?!
>
There's nothing passive in accepting a challenge.
Later,
Sean
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1072001 ] |
Tue, 11 July 2006 20:06 |
|
In article <e90em1$qn7$1$8300dec7 [at] news.demon.co.uk>,
Sean Byrne <byrne_sean_spamtrap [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
> Daithi wrote:
> > Sean Byrne wrote:
> >
> >>How about you point out the IRB ruling that *forces* teams to watch the
> >>haka or stop your whining?
> >>
> >>Teamns can do whatever they want during that time, .....usual shite.....
> >>
> >>Later,
> >>Sean
> >
> >
> > Wrong again Sean-well done- I'd imagine you make a habit of this,
> > judging by your considerted & informed views, but anyways here's a
> > little free education and background on the subject for u and other one
> > eyes.
> >
> > The Irish stood toe to toe with the All Blacks in Dublin when they were
> > captained by Willie Anderson (so it must have been circa 1989)- I think
> > it may have been Wayne Shelfords ABs. Basically the Irish rather than
> > be intimitated by passively standing by, faced the ABs, linked arms and
> > then advanced forward as the haka went on so that Willie Anderson the
> > Irish captain in the middle of the Irish line was basically nose to
> > nose with Shelford at the end of the psyche up dance. It was gripping
> > stuff and the crowd absolutely loved it.
If you want to relive that magic moment, then it is at:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/1650000/video/_1654201_nz_ire_ vi.ram
Time to bring that back, I reckon.
William Clark
PS: My cousin is in this clip, too.
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1072003 ] |
Tue, 11 July 2006 20:23 |
|
On 11 Jul 2006 07:09:44 -0700, "Daithi" <horgand [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>Greig Blanchett wrote:
>>
>> And, fair play to them, have fronted up ever since. It's pragmatism
>> really - no point making the ABs REALLY angry. They found out the hard
>> way.
>>
>> --
>> greig
>
>Its not pragmatism DoDo its regulations as laid down by the IRB. Jeez
>Greig I thought with you working at the NZRFU and all that you'd at
>least know where yere psyche up advantage right before kick off is
>enshrined in regulations!?! Especially considering the NZRFU must have
>lobbied hard to get it in there in the first place.
>
>Do you think any captain would have his team passively stand thru that
>psyche out stuff if they didn't have to!?!
Hey, it's Daz, to be sure, to be sure! And how are ye today, to be
sure to be sure, ye wee leprechaun? Up to mischief still, are we, to
be sure, to be sure?
I don't get this "psyche out" stuff, to be sure, to be sure. If it's
all just a bunch of silly dancing, why would anybody be psyched out,
to be sure, to be sure? So what is it - silly dancing OR a psyche out,
to be sure, to be sure? Can't have it both ways, to be sure, to be
sure.
--
greig
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1072007 ] |
Tue, 11 July 2006 23:09 |
|
Daithi wrote:
> Sean Byrne wrote:
> > How about you point out the IRB ruling that *forces* teams to watch the
> > haka or stop your whining?
> >
> > Teamns can do whatever they want during that time, .....usual shite.....
> >
> > Later,
> > Sean
>
> Wrong again Sean-well done- I'd imagine you make a habit of this,
> judging by your considerted & informed views, but anyways here's a
> little free education and background on the subject for u and other one
> eyes.
>
> The Irish stood toe to toe with the All Blacks in Dublin when they were
> captained by Willie Anderson (so it must have been circa 1989)- I think
> it may have been Wayne Shelfords ABs. Basically the Irish rather than
> be intimitated by passively standing by, faced the ABs, linked arms and
> then advanced forward as the haka went on so that Willie Anderson the
> Irish captain in the middle of the Irish line was basically nose to
> nose with Shelford at the end of the psyche up dance. It was gripping
> stuff and the crowd absolutely loved it.
>
> Needless to say the NZlanders went on with the usual shite about
> disrespecting the Maori heritage, and other blather seen here
> occasionally after the game. Anyway following from this and a few other
> front ups to the pre match psyche up tools, the IRB made it mandatory
> for all teams to line up on their 10 m line to face the prancing blacks
> (and other teams dances such as W Samoa, Fiji, etc) on their 10 m.
>
> So yes, although i agree its hard to believe, this psychological
> advantage is now enshrined in IRB regulations as to how the game is
> run.
>
> I'd say they'd have done the same for Japan if it was them wouldn't
> you!?!
you're so full of shit you must be related to will!
why don't you get a copy of the good, the bad and the rugby..
http://www.trademe.co.nz/nz/auction-14056285.htm
the all blacks didn't bitch afterwards you dumb fuck? why would they?
the irish are fucking useless! those fuckers wouldn't be able to
intimitated a fucking mouse lol
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1072066 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 10:50 |
|
"Daithi" <horgand [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1152626641.191360.231200 [at] m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
>
> Needless to say the NZlanders went on with the usual shite about
> disrespecting the Maori heritage, and other blather seen here
> occasionally after the game.
And heaven help any player unwittingly dissing Maori heritage by picking up leaves during the haka
as some sort of powhiri, or is that punani?
Brad
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1072071 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 11:06 |
|
"Brad Anton" <ant_on_knee [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:e92dog$c72$1 [at] austar-news.austar.net.au...
>
> "Daithi" <horgand [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1152626641.191360.231200 [at] m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> Needless to say the NZlanders went on with the usual shite about
>> disrespecting the Maori heritage, and other blather seen here
>> occasionally after the game.
>
> And heaven help any player unwittingly dissing Maori heritage by picking
> up leaves during the haka as some sort of powhiri, or is that punani?
> Brad
>
He he he he, the Aussies got a powhiri last saturday, or was that punani
also ??
he he he he.
Matua.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1072089 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 13:59 |
|
"fred" <maimail2000 [at] yahoo.co.nz> wrote in message
news:1152608397.293266.118570 [at] b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Ali Day wrote:
>> "fred" <maimail2000 [at] yahoo.co.nz> wrote in message
>> news:1152586290.298736.10700 [at] p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>> >
>> > awww poor little ali goes crying to her boyfriend
>>
>> oh dear, piss poor effort
>
> if it was so bad why did you respond then fish girl?
I feel it's my duty to educate those of lower IQ on how they may improve,
now run along.
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1072096 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 15:42 |
|
Ali Day wrote:
> "fred" <maimail2000 [at] yahoo.co.nz> wrote in message
> news:1152608397.293266.118570 [at] b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> Ali Day wrote:
>>> "fred" <maimail2000 [at] yahoo.co.nz> wrote in message
>>> news:1152586290.298736.10700 [at] p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>>>> awww poor little ali goes crying to her boyfriend
>>> oh dear, piss poor effort
>> if it was so bad why did you respond then fish girl?
>
> I feel it's my duty to educate those of lower IQ on how they may improve,
> now run along.
>
>
How can you find someone (ANYONE) less than 45 ?
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1072101 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 16:44 |
|
Greig Blanchett wrote:
> On 11 Jul 2006 07:09:44 -0700, "Daithi" <horgand [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >Greig Blanchett wrote:
> >>
> >> And, fair play to them, have fronted up ever since. It's pragmatism
> >> really - no point making the ABs REALLY angry. They found out the hard
> >> way.
> >>
> >> --
> >> greig
> >
> >Its not pragmatism DoDo its regulations as laid down by the IRB. Jeez
> >Greig I thought with you working at the NZRFU and all that you'd at
> >least know where yere psyche up advantage right before kick off is
> >enshrined in regulations!?! Especially considering the NZRFU must have
> >lobbied hard to get it in there in the first place.
> >
> >Do you think any captain would have his team passively stand thru that
> >psyche out stuff if they didn't have to!?!
>
> Hey, it's Daz, to be sure, to be sure! And how are ye today, to be
> sure to be sure, ye wee leprechaun? Up to mischief still, are we, to
> be sure, to be sure?
>
> I don't get this "psyche out" stuff, to be sure, to be sure. If it's
> all just a bunch of silly dancing, why would anybody be psyched out,
> to be sure, to be sure? So what is it - silly dancing OR a psyche out,
> to be sure, to be sure? Can't have it both ways, to be sure, to be
> sure.
>
> --
> greig
Not bad from you Greig, i think there may be a bit of original and
genuine humour in that one.
Fair play- I for one am gobsmacked!
:))) To be sure....
Daithi
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1072104 ] |
Wed, 12 July 2006 17:08 |
|
William A. T. Clark wrote:
>
> If you want to relive that magic moment, then it is at:
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/olmedia/1650000/video/_1654201_nz_ire_ vi.ram
>
> Time to bring that back, I reckon.
>
> William Clark
>
> PS: My cousin is in this clip, too.
Ah yes, magic stuff indeed. I was at that game and I can tell you it
raised the temperature a fair bit when the Irish team advanced like
that. They weren't a great side but they were prepared to fight and the
crowd appreciated that- alot.
Enough dilly dallying around supposed Maori sensitivities- Stand Up and
Fight- Time to Bring it Back!
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1072117 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 01:16 |
|
Daithi wrote:
> Not bad from you Greig, i think there may be a bit of original and
> genuine humour in that one.
>
> Fair play- I for one am gobsmacked!
>
> :))) To be sure....
> Daithi
Do I feel a HAGS coming on ...?
-- rick boyd
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1072144 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 09:41 |
|
"Lindsay" <nitwit2 [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message news:44b4fc47 [at] clear.net.nz...
> Ali Day wrote:
>> "fred" <maimail2000 [at] yahoo.co.nz> wrote in message
>> news:1152608397.293266.118570 [at] b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>> Ali Day wrote:
>>>> "fred" <maimail2000 [at] yahoo.co.nz> wrote in message
>>>> news:1152586290.298736.10700 [at] p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>>>>> awww poor little ali goes crying to her boyfriend
>>>> oh dear, piss poor effort
>>> if it was so bad why did you respond then fish girl?
>>
>> I feel it's my duty to educate those of lower IQ on how they may improve,
>> now run along.
> How can you find someone (ANYONE) less than 145 ?
Corrected your typo and the answer is easy!
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1072159 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 11:43 |
|
Ali Day wrote:
> "fred" <maimail2000 [at] yahoo.co.nz> wrote in message
> news:1152608397.293266.118570 [at] b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Ali Day wrote:
> >> "fred" <maimail2000 [at] yahoo.co.nz> wrote in message
> >> news:1152586290.298736.10700 [at] p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
> >> >
> >> > awww poor little ali goes crying to her boyfriend
> >>
> >> oh dear, piss poor effort
> >
> > if it was so bad why did you respond then fish girl?
>
> I feel it's my duty to educate those of lower IQ on how they may improve,
> now run along.
rather than trying to be funny in a ng..maybe you should go on a diet
fat boy lol
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1072160 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 11:48 |
|
Lindsay wrote:
> Ali Day wrote:
> > "fred" <maimail2000 [at] yahoo.co.nz> wrote in message
> > news:1152608397.293266.118570 [at] b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> >> Ali Day wrote:
> >>> "fred" <maimail2000 [at] yahoo.co.nz> wrote in message
> >>> news:1152586290.298736.10700 [at] p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
> >>>> awww poor little ali goes crying to her boyfriend
> >>> oh dear, piss poor effort
> >> if it was so bad why did you respond then fish girl?
> >
> > I feel it's my duty to educate those of lower IQ on how they may improve,
> > now run along.
> >
> >
> How can you find someone (ANYONE) less than 45 ?
lindsay????
are you a chick or a dork with a faggy name?
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1072171 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 13:28 |
|
rick boyd wrote:
> Daithi wrote:
>
>
> > Not bad from you Greig, i think there may be a bit of original and
> > genuine humour in that one.
> >
> > Fair play- I for one am gobsmacked!
> >
> > :))) To be sure....
> > Daithi
>
> Do I feel a HAGS coming on ...?
>
> -- rick boyd
What's a HAGS Rick?
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1072176 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 14:53 |
|
fred wrote:
> rather than trying to be funny in a ng..maybe you should go on a diet
> fat boy lol
Tell me, when you laugh out loud, is it a raucous braying of the type
generally associated with a stupid fucking moron, or is it more the
nervous cackling generally associated with a stupid fucking moron?
Richard Bridgman
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1072178 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 15:19 |
|
"Daithi" <horgand [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1152790128.740921.35870 [at] s13g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> rick boyd wrote:
>> Daithi wrote:
>>
>>
>> > Not bad from you Greig, i think there may be a bit of original and
>> > genuine humour in that one.
>> >
>> > Fair play- I for one am gobsmacked!
>> >
>> > :))) To be sure....
>> > Daithi
>>
>> Do I feel a HAGS coming on ...?
>>
>> -- rick boyd
>
> What's a HAGS Rick?
It's Shorn Burns mother.
Later
Matua.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1072183 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 16:16 |
|
Richard Bridgman wrote:
> fred wrote:
>
> > rather than trying to be funny in a ng..maybe you should go on a diet
> > fat boy lol
>
> Tell me, when you laugh out loud, is it a raucous braying of the type
> generally associated with a stupid fucking moron, or is it more the
> nervous cackling generally associated with a stupid fucking moron?
Im betting he's just a stupid fucking moron
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1072188 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 16:29 |
|
Matua wrote:
> "Daithi" <horgand [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1152790128.740921.35870 [at] s13g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > rick boyd wrote:
> >> Daithi wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> > Not bad from you Greig, i think there may be a bit of original and
> >> > genuine humour in that one.
> >> >
> >> > Fair play- I for one am gobsmacked!
> >> >
> >> > :))) To be sure....
> >> > Daithi
> >>
> >> Do I feel a HAGS coming on ...?
> >>
> >> -- rick boyd
> >
> > What's a HAGS Rick?
>
>
> It's Shorn Burns mother.
>
> Later
> Matua.
>Kinda sounds like your Mum's pet name SLAG eh Manure?
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1072189 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 17:05 |
|
Craig L wrote:
> Richard Bridgman wrote:
>
>>fred wrote:
>>
>>
>>>rather than trying to be funny in a ng..maybe you should go on a diet
>>>fat boy lol
>>
>>Tell me, when you laugh out loud, is it a raucous braying of the type
>>generally associated with a stupid fucking moron, or is it more the
>>nervous cackling generally associated with a stupid fucking moron?
>
>
> Im betting he's just a stupid fucking moron
>
I'd prefer stupid moron, to be honest. The thought of fucking and
potentially pollutimg the gene pool further...
regards
The Green Phantom
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1072192 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 17:39 |
|
The Green Phantom wrote:
> Craig L wrote:
> > Richard Bridgman wrote:
> >
> >>fred wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>rather than trying to be funny in a ng..maybe you should go on a diet
> >>>fat boy lol
> >>
> >>Tell me, when you laugh out loud, is it a raucous braying of the type
> >>generally associated with a stupid fucking moron, or is it more the
> >>nervous cackling generally associated with a stupid fucking moron?
> >
> >
> > Im betting he's just a stupid fucking moron
> >
>
> I'd prefer stupid moron, to be honest. The thought of fucking and
> potentially pollutimg the gene pool further...
I reckon he's about 13. So quite apart from anything else, it would be
illegal.
Cheers
Brent
|
|
|
| Re: Tonight's Haka [message #1072205 ] |
Thu, 13 July 2006 23:05 |
|
"Craig L" <thenzbigguy [at] yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1152800947.758219.318880 [at] s13g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> Matua wrote:
>> "Daithi" <horgand [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:1152790128.740921.35870 [at] s13g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> >
>> > rick boyd wrote:
>> >> Daithi wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > Not bad from you Greig, i think there may be a bit of original and
>> >> > genuine humour in that one.
>> >> >
>> >> > Fair play- I for one am gobsmacked!
>> >> >
>> >> > :))) To be sure....
>> >> > Daithi
>> >>
>> >> Do I feel a HAGS coming on ...?
>> >>
>> >> -- rick boyd
>> >
>> > What's a HAGS Rick?
>>
>>
>> It's Shorn Burns mother.
>>
>> Later
>> Matua.
>
>>Kinda sounds like your Mum's pet name SLAG eh Manure?
Ah der wha eh um What are you burbling about you bench pressing faggot ??
How's the haemorrhoids going balloon arse ? I hear they call you mother
"SUCK THIS SUZY" mm Craigy, you gerkin jerker.
Later
Matua.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
|
|
Gehe zu:
aktuelle Zeit: Fri Jan 9 19:57:57 CET 2009
Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0.18805 Sekunden |
