| Jay Delsing................. [message #1035247] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 21:36 |
|
loses his father = one small mention from Peter Oosterhuis.
Tiger = the ultimate in bereavement.
Give me a break.
Oh, very nice par from the muck by Delsing. It would have been the
greatest ever if Tiger had done it.
Ken
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035250 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 22:07 |
|
In article <1148845017.055158.211040 [at] j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
kenpittsjr [at] gmail.com wrote:
> loses his father = one small mention from Peter Oosterhuis.
>
> Tiger = the ultimate in bereavement.
>
> Give me a break.
>
> Oh, very nice par from the muck by Delsing. It would have been the
> greatest ever if Tiger had done it.
>
> Ken
You know, it seems to me you promised never to post about Tiger ever
again...
Can you not live up to your word?
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035251 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 21:50 |
|
"There is nothing more frightful than ignorance in action." - Johann
Goethe
--
<kenpittsjr [at] gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1148845017.055158.211040 [at] j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> loses his father = one small mention from Peter Oosterhuis.
>
> Tiger = the ultimate in bereavement.
>
> Give me a break.
>
> Oh, very nice par from the muck by Delsing. It would have been the
> greatest ever if Tiger had done it.
>
> Ken
>
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035252 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 22:19 |
|
I don't remember such a thing. Cite the post. Why don't you not worry
about me, hack?
Ken
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035255 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 22:28 |
|
Who the faq are you? What part of my post is ignorant? This is all just
another exeample of the media pumping up Tiger.
Ken
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035256 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 22:41 |
|
Hey Ken, how many majors has Jay won? How many tournaments has he won?
How many Tiger bashing posts have you put up?
Give it a break you moron.
<kenpittsjr [at] gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1148845017.055158.211040 [at] j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> loses his father = one small mention from Peter Oosterhuis.
>
> Tiger = the ultimate in bereavement.
>
> Give me a break.
>
> Oh, very nice par from the muck by Delsing. It would have been the
> greatest ever if Tiger had done it.
>
> Ken
>
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035257 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 22:43 |
|
Stick it up your azz whoever you are.
Ken
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035260 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 22:46 |
|
In article <1148847567.481383.194860 [at] 38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
kenpittsjr [at] gmail.com wrote:
> I don't remember such a thing. Cite the post. Why don't you not worry
> about me, hack?
>
> Ken
Even if I were a hack, I'd far rather be that, than be an asshole like
you.
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035262 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 22:50 |
|
In article <1148848999.253321.132800 [at] i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
kenpittsjr [at] gmail.com wrote:
> Stick it up your azz whoever you are.
>
> Ken
I love the way you clip everything so that you can pretend that "Brian
Foster" was posting anonymously...
More of your typical level of integrity, huh Ken?
Kind of like promising (with digital tears running down your eyes
because people were picking on you) not to post about Tiger ever again...
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035263 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 22:51 |
|
Go faq yourself, eh? You have never done anything but attack me since
that lie you told about me "helicoptering" a club at Newell's
tournament. I'd rather be an asshole than a lying asshole like you.
Ken
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035264 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 22:52 |
|
Oh, another mention from Clampett.
Ken
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035265 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 22:55 |
|
In article <1148849507.247509.23400 [at] 38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
kenpittsjr [at] gmail.com wrote:
> Go faq yourself, eh? You have never done anything but attack me since
> that lie you told about me "helicoptering" a club at Newell's
> tournament. I'd rather be an asshole than a lying asshole like you.
I called it the way I saw it.
And since everyone here knows you me "fuck" when you write "faq" you can
stop pretending you are the slightest bit more high-minded than anyone
else.
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035266 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 22:56 |
|
In article <1148849561.799136.180280 [at] i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
kenpittsjr [at] gmail.com wrote:
> Oh, another mention from Clampett.
>
> Ken
And now you're so obsessed that you're posting replies to yourself...
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035268 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 22:57 |
|
In article <1148848081.073037.110400 [at] u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>,
kenpittsjr [at] gmail.com wrote:
> Who the faq are you? What part of my post is ignorant? This is all just
> another exeample of the media pumping up Tiger.
>
> Ken
There you go again, Ken. You post a gratuitous opinion intended to show
the media fawning preferentially over Tiger, and as soon as someone
points out the absurdity of your post, you a) jump all over them with
your pseudo-obscenities, and then b) turn it around to claim the poster
is "pumping up Tiger".
I'm sure this will get a similar riposte, but you really should get help
for your paranoia.
William Clark
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035270 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 22:59 |
|
In article
<clark.31-10A967.16571528052006 [at] charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>,
"William A. T. Clark" <clark.31 [at] osu.edu> wrote:
> In article <1148848081.073037.110400 [at] u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>,
> kenpittsjr [at] gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Who the faq are you? What part of my post is ignorant? This is all just
> > another exeample of the media pumping up Tiger.
> >
> > Ken
>
> There you go again, Ken. You post a gratuitous opinion intended to show
> the media fawning preferentially over Tiger, and as soon as someone
> points out the absurdity of your post, you a) jump all over them with
> your pseudo-obscenities, and then b) turn it around to claim the poster
> is "pumping up Tiger".
>
> I'm sure this will get a similar riposte, but you really should get help
> for your paranoia.
>
> William Clark
I particularly love the hypocrisy inherent in complaining about someone
cursing and then using "faq".
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035271 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 23:01 |
|
There was nobody within 75 ft of me and the club was headed (tossed)
toward my bag and away from everybody that surrounded that green.
You said I was endangering people. A BLATANT LIE, YOU LIAR!
You have never done anything but attack me and lie about me.
Cite the post, eh!
Ken
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Alan Baker wrote:
> In article <1148849507.247509.23400 [at] 38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> kenpittsjr [at] gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Go faq yourself, eh? You have never done anything but attack me since
> > that lie you told about me "helicoptering" a club at Newell's
> > tournament. I'd rather be an asshole than a lying asshole like you.
>
> I called it the way I saw it.
>
> And since everyone here knows you me "fuck" when you write "faq" you can
> stop pretending you are the slightest bit more high-minded than anyone
> else.
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035273 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 23:01 |
|
Cite the post, eh!
Ken
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035274 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 23:02 |
|
Alan Baker wrote:
> In article <1148849561.799136.180280 [at] i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> kenpittsjr [at] gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Oh, another mention from Clampett.
> >
> > Ken
>
> And now you're so obsessed that you're posting replies to yourself...
If by obsessed you mean arguing with other grown ups in a relatively
anonymous Internet forum in the faint hope that you will somehow prove
yourself more correct, or less stupid, then yeah, he's the one who is
obsessed alright...not you at all.
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035276 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 23:08 |
|
In article <1148850071.777149.93980 [at] j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"BowTie - Chevy" <bowtieroller [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
> There was nobody within 75 ft of me and the club was headed (tossed)
> toward my bag and away from everybody that surrounded that green.
>
> You said I was endangering people. A BLATANT LIE, YOU LIAR!
Funny. When it first came up, you denied throwing the club *at all*.
So were you lying then, or are you lying now?
>
> You have never done anything but attack me and lie about me.
>
> Cite the post, eh!
How can I? You've changed your posting identity so many times
("LittleDueceCoupe", "BowTieChevy", etc.; presumably to avoid the
killfiles to which you'd been added)?
>
> Ken
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Alan Baker wrote:
> > In article <1148849507.247509.23400 [at] 38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> > kenpittsjr [at] gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > Go faq yourself, eh? You have never done anything but attack me since
> > > that lie you told about me "helicoptering" a club at Newell's
> > > tournament. I'd rather be an asshole than a lying asshole like you.
> >
> > I called it the way I saw it.
> >
> > And since everyone here knows you me "fuck" when you write "faq" you can
> > stop pretending you are the slightest bit more high-minded than anyone
> > else.
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035278 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 23:09 |
|
In article <1148850103.328932.148620 [at] j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"BowTie - Chevy" <bowtieroller [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
> Cite the post, eh!
>
> Ken
Why don't I just cite the post were you deny throwing a club that you
now admit you threw.
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035280 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 23:03 |
|
I'm not on national TV, eh?
Ken
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035281 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 23:04 |
|
"he's the one who is
obsessed alright...not you at all."
Thank you. I post an opinion and he starts attacking me.
Ken
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035284 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 23:11 |
|
In article <1148850131.058722.276170 [at] j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"Ben." <kombi45 [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
> Alan Baker wrote:
> > In article <1148849561.799136.180280 [at] i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> > kenpittsjr [at] gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > Oh, another mention from Clampett.
> > >
> > > Ken
> >
> > And now you're so obsessed that you're posting replies to yourself...
>
> If by obsessed you mean arguing with other grown ups in a relatively
> anonymous Internet forum in the faint hope that you will somehow prove
> yourself more correct, or less stupid, then yeah, he's the one who is
> obsessed alright...not you at all.
This is very simple: Pitts disrupts this group, and changes his posting
identity with regularity to avoid people's killfiles. I actually had him
killfiled until a recent system problem caused me to have to reset it.
So I figure if he wants to disrupt the group with posts he promised
never to make again, I get to reply to *him* as I like.
<g>
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035285 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 23:11 |
|
I honestly had to have my menory refreshed. How about if I cite the
post where you said I was endangering people even though nobody was
within 25 yds of me. And then you called it "helicoptering" when it was
tossed at the very best. Liar
Ken
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035287 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 23:12 |
|
You're the one who is disrupting with your lies and attacks. I was
merely stating an opinion, hack.
Ken
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035288 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 23:14 |
|
In article <1148850212.366098.73020 [at] 38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"BowTie - Chevy" <bowtieroller [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
> I'm not on national TV, eh?
>
> Ken
So? Things are made more right or more wrong by being televised.
For example, it would be no more wrong for you to have gone back on your
word about not posting anymore on the subject of Tiger Woods had you
done so on television.
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035289 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 23:14 |
|
In article <1148850268.376138.106900 [at] j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"BowTie - Chevy" <bowtieroller [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
> "he's the one who is
> obsessed alright...not you at all."
>
> Thank you. I post an opinion and he starts attacking me.
>
> Ken
How is observing the fact that you're posting replies to yourself an
attack?
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035290 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 23:17 |
|
In article <1148850683.720646.304970 [at] u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com>,
"BowTie - Chevy" <bowtieroller [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
> > In article <1148850103.328932.148620 [at] j73g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> > "BowTie - Chevy" <bowtieroller [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Cite the post, eh!
> > >
> > > Ken
> >
> > Why don't I just cite the post were you deny throwing a club that you
> > now admit you threw.
>
> I honestly had to have my menory refreshed.
How do you mean? At the time, you categorically denied as much as
throwing a club.
> How about if I cite the
> post where you said I was endangering people even though nobody was
> within 25 yds of me.
Yes, how about you do that? You see, unlike you, I post all my messages
under one email address...
> And then you called it "helicoptering" when it was
> tossed at the very best. Liar
So was it tossing or throwing -- as you now say, or was it not at all,
as you claimed at the time?
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035292 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 23:19 |
|
Alan Baker wrote:
> > If by obsessed you mean arguing with other grown ups in a relatively
> > anonymous Internet forum in the faint hope that you will somehow prove
> > yourself more correct, or less stupid, then yeah, he's the one who is
> > obsessed alright...not you at all.
>
> This is very simple: Pitts disrupts this group, and changes his posting
> identity with regularity to avoid people's killfiles. I actually had him
> killfiled until a recent system problem caused me to have to reset it.
>
> So I figure if he wants to disrupt the group with posts he promised
> never to make again, I get to reply to *him* as I like.
I hear ya, bro. Usenet is low on the list of things that "disrupt" me,
but you're 100% right - you can do whatever you want. Sorry.
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035294 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 23:21 |
|
In article <1148850779.403383.111400 [at] 38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"BowTie - Chevy" <bowtieroller [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
> You're the one who is disrupting with your lies and attacks. I was
> merely stating an opinion, hack.
>
> Ken
Better a hack than a crybaby.
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035295 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 23:21 |
|
In article <1148851180.332377.306540 [at] g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
"Ben." <kombi45 [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
> Alan Baker wrote:
>
> > > If by obsessed you mean arguing with other grown ups in a relatively
> > > anonymous Internet forum in the faint hope that you will somehow prove
> > > yourself more correct, or less stupid, then yeah, he's the one who is
> > > obsessed alright...not you at all.
> >
> > This is very simple: Pitts disrupts this group, and changes his posting
> > identity with regularity to avoid people's killfiles. I actually had him
> > killfiled until a recent system problem caused me to have to reset it.
> >
> > So I figure if he wants to disrupt the group with posts he promised
> > never to make again, I get to reply to *him* as I like.
>
> I hear ya, bro. Usenet is low on the list of things that "disrupt" me,
> but you're 100% right - you can do whatever you want. Sorry.
Graciously said, sir!
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035297 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 23:27 |
|
I honestly did not remember until I verified it with Scott Newell who
recounted what happened. I was pissed because I almost 3putted to lose
a bet that would have required a loan for me to cover.
I know you're perfect and have never thrown a club or abused a golf
course.
The lie is that I helicoptered it and endangered people. That will
never happen with me because I was almost killed by that very thing.
There was not a sould within 75 ft of me and the club was directed away
from everyone.
Why don't you just leave me alone, hack?
Ken
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035298 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 23:30 |
|
You're delusional. You can have the last word. I hope you're proud of
yourself.
Ken
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035299 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 23:33 |
|
In article <1148851645.080489.57890 [at] j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"BowTie - Chevy" <bowtieroller [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
> I honestly did not remember until I verified it with Scott Newell who
> recounted what happened. I was pissed because I almost 3putted to lose
> a bet that would have required a loan for me to cover.
Funny. At the time, you said Scott had confirmed that you *didn't* throw
a club.
>
> I know you're perfect and have never thrown a club or abused a golf
> course.
On the contrary. I am *far* from perfect. Which is why I don't expect
others to be perfect, either.
>
> The lie is that I helicoptered it and endangered people. That will
Where did I say you'd endangered anyone. I specifically said you had
done it *away* from the people in your group.
> never happen with me because I was almost killed by that very thing.
> There was not a sould within 75 ft of me and the club was directed away
> from everyone.
>
> Why don't you just leave me alone, hack?
Fuck you. (Yes, that's right: I'm brave enough to say "fuck" when I mean
"fuck").
< URL:http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.golf/search?gro up=rec.sport
..golf&q=%22what+will+it+take%22+tiger&qt_g=1&se archnow=Search+this+group >
Remember this from January/February last year? Where you whined like a
little girl because all the mean people had put you in their killfiles?
Where you promised not to post on the subject of Tiger anymore? Where
you broke your promise in less than one *month*.
*That's* why I don't leave you alone. That, and the fact that I've a few
minutest to kill while I let my PVR get far enough ahead that I don't
have to see any commercials while watching the Memorial Cup.
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035300 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 23:34 |
|
In article <1148851829.977004.220130 [at] j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"BowTie - Chevy" <bowtieroller [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
> > In article <1148850212.366098.73020 [at] 38g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> > "BowTie - Chevy" <bowtieroller [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not on national TV, eh?
> > >
> > > Ken
> >
> > So? Things are made more right or more wrong by being televised.
> >
> > For example, it would be no more wrong for you to have gone back on your
> > word about not posting anymore on the subject of Tiger Woods had you
> > done so on television.
>
> You're delusional. You can have the last word. I hope you're proud of
> yourself.
>
> Ken
< URL:http://groups.google.com/group/rec.sport.golf/search?gro up=rec.sport
..golf&q=%22what+will+it+take%22+tiger&qt_g=1&se archnow=Search+this+group >
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035304 ] |
Sun, 28 May 2006 23:45 |
|
I hate it when Pitts runs out of meds before the end of the month and has to
wait for next month's welfare check before buying another supply. Maybe we
ought to take up a collection to help out the poor guy.
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035310 ] |
Mon, 29 May 2006 00:08 |
|
sfb wrote:
>I hate it when Pitts runs out of meds
> before the end of the month and has to
> wait for next month's welfare check
> before buying another supply. Maybe we
> ought to take up a collection to help out
> the poor guy.
sfb,
Count me out. Pitts bring on this crap by himself. Let him stew in his
own juices.
He is one sick dude.
Cheers Lee O.
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035312 ] |
Mon, 29 May 2006 00:35 |
|
On Sun, 28 May 2006 20:55:35 GMT, Alan Baker <alangbaker [at] telus.net>
wrote:
>And since everyone here knows you me "fuck" when you write "faq" you can
>stop pretending you are the slightest bit more high-minded than anyone
>else.
Spelling challenged?
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035318 ] |
Mon, 29 May 2006 01:24 |
|
On Sun, 28 May 2006 17:45:32 -0400, "sfb" <sfb [at] spam.net> wrote:
>I hate it when Pitts runs out of meds before the end of the month and has to
>wait for next month's welfare check before buying another supply. Maybe we
>ought to take up a collection to help out the poor guy.
Can't he just cash in his empties?
>
|
|
|
| Re: Jay Delsing................. [message #1035332 ] |
Mon, 29 May 2006 02:13 |
|
On Sun, 28 May 2006 12:36:57 -0700, kenpittsjr wrote:
> loses his father = one small mention from Peter Oosterhuis.
>
> Tiger = the ultimate in bereavement.
>
> Give me a break.
Give *us* a break.
|
|
|
