|
Sports » rec.sport.golf » moving (up/down) head
| moving (up/down) head [message #1034766] |
Fr, 26 Mai 2006 03:42 |
|
Hi all,
it has been said to me, that I move the head, and that also the angle of
the upperbody changes on the way to the impact (of course, since the
head ducks down).
http://www.calmar.ws/gallery/ems_2006_13th_day/index.htm
(xvid encoded: http://www.divx-digest.com/software/xvid.html)
Well, what I really do, is moving up on the backswing, yet I don't care
about that, I could change that instantly with a different setup there:
( http://www.calmar.ws/gallery/ems_2006_7th_day/bilder/w1_back .avi )
But what I can't is preventing the moving on the downswing.
Yet I saw some pros, who also duck quite down during the downswing:
http://www.calmar.ws/couples.jpg
it's quite some amount, isn' it? (to get the pic straight.
also here it's obvious:
http://www.calmar.ws/gallery/ems_swing-pics/bilder/price_ar. jpg
http://www.calmar.ws/gallery/ems_swing-pics/bilder/lane_swin g.jpg
and on many more:
http://www.calmar.ws/gallery/ems_swing-pics/index.htm
So I guess, I don't have to care about that really, since I can't change
it anyway (I really guess so far), or have I?
cheers
cheers
marco aka calmar
PS: Stays some different plane on the up and downswing to care at least :)
--
(o_ It rocks: LINUX + Command-Line-Interface
//\
V_/_ http://www.calmar.ws
|
|
|
| Re: moving (up/down) head [message #1034810 ] |
Fr, 26 Mai 2006 07:00 |
|
On Fri, 26 May 2006 03:42:31 +0200, calmar wrote:
> http://www.calmar.ws/dotfiles/dotfiledir/bashrc-dot
>
> export CFLAGS="-march=athlon-xp -m3dnow -msse -mfpmath=sse -mmmx -O3
> -pipe -fforce-addr -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
> -frerun-cse-after-loop -frerun-loop-opt -falign-functions=4
> -maccumulate-outgoing-args -ffast-math -fprefetch-loop-arrays"
Gentoo?
Me, I use Redhat at work, 64-bit SMP Ubuntu at home.
About your golf swing. You have good power, a lot of natural flexibility
and strength. At this point I would suggest lessons from a good teaching
professional. I think you have what it takes to be a very good
ball-striker, but the swing is too difficult to learn on your own.
|
|
|
| Re: moving (up/down) head [message #1034886 ] |
Fr, 26 Mai 2006 19:13 |
|
On 2006-05-26, Carbon <nobrac [at] nospam.verizon.net> wrote:
Hi,
>
>> http://www.calmar.ws/dotfiles/dotfiledir/bashrc-dot
>>
>> export CFLAGS="-march=athlon-xp -m3dnow -msse -mfpmath=sse -mmmx -O3
[...]
>
> Gentoo?
> Me, I use Redhat at work, 64-bit SMP Ubuntu at home.
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org I used for a while, there I had a lot to
compile (and learn).
happy with debian now :) (ubuntu is based on it, isn't it)
> About your golf swing. You have good power, a lot of natural flexibility
> and strength. At this point I would suggest lessons from a good teaching
> professional. I think you have what it takes to be a very good
> ball-striker, but the swing is too difficult to learn on your own.
mine is actually very easy I have to say :) (and I could even teach that
(1:1) to everybody else, because i'm very much of a
theoretican/analysing person myself and do nothing in golf, what is not
covered by my 'own theory/guidelines'). The lenght is in the
'playing-pros' area, and the precision, is already quite satisfying, yet have
to get better so.., I will see.
maybe what books/teachers tells, might is _complicate_, and mostly not
working as well.
Would you think the good playing prof, did/do 'complicate' things,
rather than having their easy natural swing? They can't be that precise
with a 'complicate something', nor that powerful, IMO.
They rather grasped, when they were young, a good concept of hitting a
ball, maybe *little* inclueced by this or that told by a local (not that
good) teaching pro, and that's it. There is really nothing complicate on
it what they have done - they probably don't even know 'why' they play
as well, and what actually others do fundamentally do wrong.
Many didn't have any teacher at all really, or at least no really
influencing one (Ballesteros, Langer and many many more ....)
Anyway, IMO, that 'good concept of hitting a ball' is hardly covered on
whatever I was reading about theories, it's always more like polishing
the outside, rather than putting a good engine into the car.
There are no good teaching professional available here anyway, and as so
stubborn as I am, and since I always do everything on my own, well I
have to live with it I guess ;)
cheers and thanks,
marco
PS: I guess I can/must live with the up/down of the head, the path
should get better soon in the case it's not, automatically while trying
to reach better precision)
PSII: I basically know about everything about theory, yet maybe outdated
somebit. I did read many books 20 years ago or so. I was always the
'theoretican' checking out everything, rather than actually the one
trying to get a good score (got hcd 7 with 13 anyway) but I still
prefered checkout out things (books etc), instead of playing for a score
(for some reason). Having figured out 'my theory' and happy with it
finally, I try to score from now on.. finally with 32 years, hehe.
--
(o_ It rocks: LINUX + Command-Line-Interface
//\
V_/_ http://www.calmar.ws
|
|
|
| Re: moving (up/down) head [message #1067401 ] |
Do, 08 Juni 2006 18:15 |
|
On 2006-05-26, calmar <mac [at] calmar.ws> wrote:
Hi again...
>
> PS: I guess I can/must live with the up/down of the head, the path
> should get better soon in the case it's not, automatically while trying
> to reach better precision)
Well while trying to get rid of that outside/in thing, I discovered,
when I go up steep, I get a nice inside/out swing, when I 'go up' flat,
I get a out-side in impact.
That is here, because when I go up steep, on the top of the upswing, I
go back to the 'optimal?' line - move further inwards and from that
inwards position, I make a inside/out swing. And vice-versa.
Glad I could get rid of that outside/in thing - it's not that obvious,
the solution, in the first moment.
http://www.calmar.ws/gallery/ems_2006_20th_day_inside-out-no w/index.htm
(direct videos)
inside-out: http://tinyurl.com/zqwe4 (feels steeper for me than it is)
outside-in: http://tinyurl.com/jjgv9
maybe when someone is 'suffering' the same thing (e.g. an outside/in
swing on the impact, a steeper (obviously it's less steep then what it
might feels like) 'upswing' might help...
cheers
marco
PS: they told me about the flat upswing here, I'm glad I'm able to get
rid of it now with some good reason. thx
--
(o_ It rocks: LINUX + Command-Line-Interface
//\
V_/_ http://www.calmar.ws
|
|
|
Gehe zu:
aktuelle Zeit: Sa Jul 31 02:27:55 CEST 2010
Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0,05114 Sekunden |
