| The Rose Award for 5-15-2006. [message #1015379] |
Wed, 17 May 2006 00:02 |
|
The Rose Award goes to Pedro Feliz of the San Francisco Giants, who
went three-for-five with five RBI and scored two runs in a 10-1 win
over the Houston Astros.
Barry Bonds doubled and walked in four plate appearances.
|
|
|
| Re: The Rose Award for 5-15-2006. [message #1015380 ] |
Wed, 17 May 2006 00:22 |
|
I'm sure he's thrilled by the news. He's likely written his mother and told
him of this prestigious honor.
In a related matter,
I would like to announce the Rose Award Committee has won the coveted PSA
(Pretentious Spam Award). This award is bestowed when appropriate for
distributing SPAM that is pointlessly self-serving. The award is a bright
shiny mirror. Recipients can gaze in wonder at their own self-important
reflections without commercial interruption and more importantly, without
interrupting anyone from anything of greater importance, such as a pressing
need to rearrange one's sock drawer. Of course, the PSA will be delivered
postage due.
|
|
|
| Re: The Rose Award for 5-15-2006. [message #1015382 ] |
Wed, 17 May 2006 00:35 |
|
Triple <rhager4 [at] comcast.net> trolled:
> I'm sure he's thrilled by the news. He's likely written his mother and told
> him of this prestigious honor.
> In a related matter,
> I would like to announce the Rose Award Committee has won the
> coveted PSA (Pretentious Spam Award).
More properly known as the R. Hager Award, which recognizes the
tiniest shit on usenet in any given day.
Open your mouth. Here it comes.
Bugger off.
cordially, even to trash like R. Hager,
rm
|
|
|
| Re: The Rose Award for 5-15-2006. [message #1015383 ] |
Wed, 17 May 2006 00:40 |
|
> cordially, even to trash like R. Hager,
>
Trash? Certainly you can do better than that? Oh, are you on the Rose Award
Committee? That could explain a lot.
|
|
|
| Re: The Rose Award for 5-15-2006. [message #1015385 ] |
Wed, 17 May 2006 01:35 |
|
--
"And reality has a well-known liberal bias." -- Stephen Colbert
"Triple" <rhager4 [at] comcast.net> wrote in message
news:68mdnfMmv5BWyffZnZ2dneKdnZydnZ2d [at] comcast.com...
>
>> cordially, even to trash like R. Hager,
>>
>
> Trash? Certainly you can do better than that? Oh, are you on the Rose
> Award Committee? That could explain a lot.
The slime will shit on anybody in its attempt to bring everyone down to its
level. A google search of its many user names will reveal a pattern of
mental illness spread all over usenet in a variety of newsgroups. It is
universally hated, reviled and a source of disgust to all who encounter it.
This thing is barely human and should be ignored.
|
|
|
| Re: The Rose Award for 5-15-2006. [message #1015386 ] |
Wed, 17 May 2006 02:03 |
|
> The slime will shit on anybody in its attempt to bring everyone down to
> its
> level. A google search of its many user names will reveal a pattern of
> mental illness spread all over usenet in a variety of newsgroups. It is
> universally hated, reviled and a source of disgust to all who encounter
> it.
>
> This thing is barely human and should be ignored.
>
Are you speaking of me, the responder or the Rose Award?
|
|
|
| Re: The Rose Award for 5-15-2006. [message #1015387 ] |
Wed, 17 May 2006 02:07 |
|
Easy <easydoesit [at] earthlink.com> trolled:
[deletia]
That's easy for you to say.
cordially, as always,
rm
--
Even Nelson Lu has no clue!
|
|
|
| Re: The Rose Award for 5-15-2006. [message #1015388 ] |
Wed, 17 May 2006 02:07 |
|
Triple <rhager4 [at] comcast.net> trolled:
> > The slime will shit on anybody in its attempt to bring everyone
> > down to its level. A google search of its many user names will
> > reveal a pattern of mental illness spread all over usenet in a
> > variety of newsgroups. It is universally hated, reviled and a
> > source of disgust to all who encounter it.
> > This thing is barely human and should be ignored.
> Are you speaking of me, the responder or the Rose Award?
Does it matter?
cordially, as always,
rm
|
|
|
| Re: The Rose Award for 5-15-2006. [message #1015389 ] |
Wed, 17 May 2006 02:27 |
|
I speak of the troll. Not you of course.
--
"And reality has a well-known liberal bias." -- Stephen Colbert
"Triple" <rhager4 [at] comcast.net> wrote in message
news:ZpCdnUTf-ovO9ffZnZ2dnUVZ_vGdnZ2d [at] comcast.com...
>
>> The slime will shit on anybody in its attempt to bring everyone down to
>> its
>> level. A google search of its many user names will reveal a pattern of
>> mental illness spread all over usenet in a variety of newsgroups. It is
>> universally hated, reviled and a source of disgust to all who encounter
>> it.
>>
>> This thing is barely human and should be ignored.
>>
>
> Are you speaking of me, the responder or the Rose Award?
>
|
|
|
| Re: The Rose Award for 5-15-2006. [message #1015394 ] |
Wed, 17 May 2006 07:25 |
|
On Tue, 16 May 2006 17:27:34 -0700, "Easy" <easydoesit [at] earthlink.com>
wrote:
>I speak of the troll. Not you of course.
Your not making sense, the two sentences contradict each other. YOUR
CONFUSING ME!!!!
So are you talking about Triple or not?
|
|
|
| Re: The Rose Award for 5-15-2006. [message #1015395 ] |
Wed, 17 May 2006 11:50 |
|
<rosecomm4256 [at] aol.com> wrote in message
news:1147816937.892248.288590 [at] i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> The Rose Award goes to Pedro Feliz of the San Francisco Giants, who
> went three-for-five with five RBI and scored two runs in a 10-1 win
> over the Houston Astros.
It appears that Pete Rose betted on the Reds 4,256 times and went
bankrupt. Then Rose met Rosecomm in jail and they had sex 4,256 times.
Why did you think he named himself Rosecomm4256? Because he swallowed
Rose's cum 4,256 times!
|
|
|
| Re: The Rose Award for 5-15-2006. [message #1038958 ] |
Wed, 17 May 2006 19:23 |
|
Maybe I'd be less put off by this award if the posts came with some
background. Maybe just a note at that bottom that starts off, "The Rose
Award was created to..." and then lists what merits an award, who the
committee is and what their qualifications are.
I have a feeling they are trying to get name recognition so they can sell
sponserships or something. If that is the goal, a website that showed clips
of the award winner for the day would generate much more interest than a
text message.
|
|
|
