| Spoiler - Hatton v Collazo [message #1014665] |
Sun, 14 May 2006 05:47 |
|
Hatton wins a UD in a slug-fest.
A close fight with Collazo seemingly doing enough in the latter rounds to
win, perhaps landing the heavier punches but Hatton firing more.
Fair to say Hatton found the move to 147lbs tough indeed.
GDS
|
|
|
| Re: Spoiler - Hatton v Collazo [message #1014666 ] |
Sun, 14 May 2006 05:49 |
|
Well...
I don't see Hatton beating anyone else of name. He was used to the
home cooking in England when it came to the crowd and the referee.
I am still waiting for the Referee to take a point from him for hitting
and holding. The knockdown in the first round shouldn't have been
called becasue that ref did yell "break" when Hatton was holding down
Collazo's head with the right hand.
Let's see how he will do in New Jersey or Las Vegas with a more
expereinced Referee.
Collazo got some more good fights left in him. He was on the cusp of
some bigger fights had he won. Maybe against Margarito.
Hatton-Margarito,...How would that go?
Brian Davis
Chicago, IL
|
|
|
| Re: Spoiler - Hatton v Collazo [message #1014667 ] |
Sun, 14 May 2006 05:53 |
|
> Fair to say Hatton found the move to 147lbs tough indeed.
>
> GDS
Well, we told you guys that Collazo is the real deal. It wasnt just the
jump to 147. Collazo is a very good fighter, and will be champ again. I
felt he did enough to win, with his harder cleaner punches. Hatton did
outstanding bodywork early, but Louie let too many rounds in the middle get
away from him by letting Ricky mug him. He almost had Hatton out in the
end. To the guy who said Collazo wouldnt last 3 rounds, and the guy who
asked how did Collazo become champ, I hope you have a new found respect for
an excellent welterweight fighter. Give credit to Ricky, I knew this would
be a tough fight for him, but as I said before, Mayweather would have a
field day with him.
|
|
|
| Re: Spoiler - Hatton v Collazo [message #1014668 ] |
Sun, 14 May 2006 05:53 |
|
I missed the first round, with Hatton scoring a knockdown. By the end
of round 5, I'm thinking Hatton doesn't deserve to win if this is all
we see. He didn't improve, got hammered coming in in the last four
rounds, and got a HBO star's gift decision. Didn't make a fan of me at
all - I was neutral before. As much as boxing got excitement last week
from the mastery of DLH, it went backwards again with this "show". I've
got no desire to see Hatton fight again...
|
|
|
| Re: Spoiler - Hatton v Collazo [message #1014669 ] |
Sun, 14 May 2006 05:50 |
|
i thought hatton looked terrible... and i like the guy, and watched his
other fights. any casual fan who turns on hbo tonight and sees him for the
first time will not be very impressed. they will be saying "HE wants to
fight mayweather? he will get killed!"
"GreenDistantStar" <GreenNOSPAMdistantstar [at] bigpond.com> wrote in message
news:iLx9g.3547$S7.2639 [at] news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> Hatton wins a UD in a slug-fest.
>
> A close fight with Collazo seemingly doing enough in the latter rounds to
> win, perhaps landing the heavier punches but Hatton firing more.
>
> Fair to say Hatton found the move to 147lbs tough indeed.
>
> GDS
>
|
|
|
| Re: Spoiler - Hatton v Collazo [message #1014672 ] |
Sun, 14 May 2006 05:56 |
|
> I don't see Hatton beating anyone else of name. He was used to the
> home cooking in England when it came to the crowd and the referee.
Ricky Hatton is an overrated white bread piece of SHIT. Mayweather will
knock out that cracker in the first minute of the first round if Hatton
doesn't punk out of that fight.
> I am still waiting for the Referee to take a point from him for hitting
> and holding. The knockdown in the first round shouldn't have been
> called becasue that ref did yell "break" when Hatton was holding down
> Collazo's head with the right hand.
Ricky Hatton is protected because he is WHITE.
Yours in racial harmony,
Shamir Shabazz
|
|
|
| Re: Spoiler - Hatton v Collazo [message #1014674 ] |
Sun, 14 May 2006 06:02 |
|
>I missed the first round, with Hatton scoring a knockdown. By the end
> of round 5, I'm thinking Hatton doesn't deserve to win if this is all
> we see. He didn't improve, got hammered coming in in the last four
> rounds, and got a HBO star's gift decision. Didn't make a fan of me at
> all - I was neutral before. As much as boxing got excitement last week
> from the mastery of DLH, it went backwards again with this "show". I've
> got no desire to see Hatton fight again...
Collazo landed three times as many punches and I don't think that white
piece of shit Hatton deserved to win one round. Mayweather will knock out
that cracker in the first round if they ever fight.
Shamir Shabazz
|
|
|
| Re: Spoiler - Hatton v Collazo [message #1014675 ] |
Sun, 14 May 2006 06:04 |
|
> My question is, where in the hell did they get that ref???
A white referee giving all the breaks to an overrated whitebread piece of
shit (Hatton). Why are you surprised?
Shamir
|
|
|
| Re: Spoiler - Hatton v Collazo [message #1014676 ] |
Sun, 14 May 2006 05:57 |
|
"rob" <1 [at] 1.com> wrote in message
news:tOx9g.13830$Gg.1622 [at] twister.nyroc.rr.com...
>i thought hatton looked terrible... and i like the guy, and watched his
>other fights.
I like Hatton, he is good for the sport, but he didnt look any different
than he did against Tszyu, the problem was, he had a young, slick, strong,
confident fighter in front of him with good timing. Tszyu was a lil past
his prime, the Tszyu a few years prior wouldve been able to time Ricky
better.
My question is, where in the hell did they get that ref???
|
|
|
| Re: Spoiler - Hatton v Collazo [message #1014677 ] |
Sun, 14 May 2006 06:00 |
|
On Sun, 14 May 2006 03:56:33 GMT, "Shamir Shabazz"
<tavington [at] zsazsabinks.com> wrote:
>
>Ricky Hatton is protected because he is WHITE.
>
>Yours in racial harmony,
>Shamir Shabazz
>
Bullshit!
DCI
|
|
|
| Re: Spoiler - Hatton v Collazo [message #1014679 ] |
Sun, 14 May 2006 06:04 |
|
>>Ricky Hatton is protected because he is WHITE.
>>
>>Yours in racial harmony,
>>Shamir Shabazz
>
> Bullshit!
Are you mad because Collazo exposed that overrated white boy, Hatton???
Shamir
|
|
|
| Re: Spoiler - Hatton v Collazo [message #1014680 ] |
Sun, 14 May 2006 06:06 |
|
Well...
Here is the situation with the officials for the fight. This fight
didn't actually get the ok and sanction by the WBA until about Tuesday.
The fight was about to go on a a non-title fight becasue Collazo has
an overdue mandatory in Ukral.
When the WBA gave the green light for the sanction on Tuesday, it was
too late to arrange for the Judges and to assign a referee for the
fight. So all the officials were local officials.
Now, here is what has to happen now that Hatton won. He has to Fight
Otray Uktal in four months or risk getting stripped. If he wins that
fight, he has to fight another Mandatory against a no-name non descript
fighter.
Leave it to the WBA to mess things up.
Brian Davis
Chicago, IL
|
|
|
| Re: Spoiler - Hatton v Collazo [message #1014681 ] |
Sun, 14 May 2006 06:16 |
|
On Sun, 14 May 2006 04:04:16 GMT, "Shamir Shabazz"
<tavington [at] zsazsabinks.com> wrote:
>> My question is, where in the hell did they get that ref???
>
>A white referee giving all the breaks to an overrated whitebread piece of
>shit (Hatton). Why are you surprised?
>
>Shamir
>
You're quite an analyst. Care to expound on your general life's
problems.
DCI
|
|
|
| Re: Spoiler - Hatton v Collazo [message #1014683 ] |
Sun, 14 May 2006 06:17 |
|
On Sun, 14 May 2006 04:04:58 GMT, "Shamir Shabazz"
<tavington [at] zsazsabinks.com> wrote:
>>>Ricky Hatton is protected because he is WHITE.
>>>
>>>Yours in racial harmony,
>>>Shamir Shabazz
>>
>> Bullshit!
>
>Are you mad because Collazo exposed that overrated white boy, Hatton???
>
>Shamir
>
No.
DCI
|
|
|
| Re: Spoiler - Hatton v Collazo [message #1014685 ] |
Sun, 14 May 2006 06:31 |
|
He's a Johnny one note. But how did you - DCI - score and view the
fight?
|
|
|
| Re: Spoiler - Hatton v Collazo [message #1014686 ] |
Sun, 14 May 2006 06:39 |
|
ahhh, i can feel the harmony! I'd call it something like diminished 5th
or a minor 2nd, but my least favorite harmony is tertian harmony ,so
i'll call it a 4:5:6 major triad....thanks for the love.not hatton at
his best for sure, but credit Collazo too. Hatton is not a big WW, and
i don't think this is his weight .But i think he came up there to fight
PBF, and he did so by fighting a tough lefty champ in his first WW
bout.....so win or loose, what's not to like?
yours in cosmic harmony,
daniel anthony
|
|
|
| Re: Spoiler - Hatton v Collazo [message #1014693 ] |
Sun, 14 May 2006 07:21 |
|
Three times as many punches? Which fight were you watching? If you don't
think Hatton deserves to win at leasat get the stats right. I think Hatton
threw more and landed around the same percentage as Collazo.
"Shamir Shabazz" <tavington [at] zsazsabinks.com> wrote in message
news:NZx9g.161070$WI1.19490 [at] pd7tw2no...
> >I missed the first round, with Hatton scoring a knockdown. By the end
>> of round 5, I'm thinking Hatton doesn't deserve to win if this is all
>> we see. He didn't improve, got hammered coming in in the last four
>> rounds, and got a HBO star's gift decision. Didn't make a fan of me at
>> all - I was neutral before. As much as boxing got excitement last week
>> from the mastery of DLH, it went backwards again with this "show". I've
>> got no desire to see Hatton fight again...
>
> Collazo landed three times as many punches and I don't think that white
> piece of shit Hatton deserved to win one round. Mayweather will knock out
> that cracker in the first round if they ever fight.
>
> Shamir Shabazz
>
|
|
|
| Re: Spoiler - Hatton v Collazo [message #1014697 ] |
Sun, 14 May 2006 07:26 |
|
GreenDistantStar posted:
Spoiler - Hatton v Collazo
Group: rec.sport.boxing Date: Sun, May 14, 2006, 3:47am (CDT+5) From:
GreenNOSPAMdistantstar [at] bigpond.com (GreenDistantStar)
Hatton wins a UD in a slug-fest.
A close fight with Collazo seemingly doing enough in the latter rounds
to win, perhaps landing the heavier punches but Hatton firing more.
Fair to say Hatton found the move to 147lbs tough indeed.
GDS
First of all I don't think Hatton looked terrible like the majority
of posters think. He was in a tough, competitive fight and alot of
credit and props should go out to Collazo. Hatton wasn't "protected"
over in England. Carlos Maussa wasn't a laydown opponent. I thought the
referee who worked the fight did a good job and took charge and often so
no excuses on that front. Hatton has a relentless, stay busy style and
anybody who thinks Mayweather, Margarito or Cotto will have an easy go
of it with him are in for a rude awakening. It was his first bout at
welterweight , the guy he fought was a southpaw and he didn't score a KO
but that's no reason to write Hatton off just yet.
|
|
|
