| Over 90 new images in our Derby City photo gallery [message #1006649] |
Mon, 08 May 2006 01:38 |
|
I just uploaded about 90 new images to our gallery of the 2005 Derby
City Classic. When we first put the gallery up, a little over a year
ago, we just uploaded 28 images. Interest in these photos has been much
greater than I anticipated, so I went back to our original image files
and uploaded all of them that were reasonably sharp and clear. There
are now 120 images from the 2005 Derby City Classic; go check and see
if you are in one of the photos.
http://billporter.smugmug.com/gallery/1436573
|
|
|
| Re: Over 90 new images in our Derby City photo gallery [message #1006690 ] |
Mon, 08 May 2006 21:36 |
|
nice..
thanks.
Earl and Jose looked like they were having
a discussion, huh?
<billporter1874 [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1147045094.196657.61360 [at] u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
>I just uploaded about 90 new images to our gallery of the 2005 Derby
> City Classic. When we first put the gallery up, a little over a year
> ago, we just uploaded 28 images. Interest in these photos has been much
> greater than I anticipated, so I went back to our original image files
> and uploaded all of them that were reasonably sharp and clear. There
> are now 120 images from the 2005 Derby City Classic; go check and see
> if you are in one of the photos.
>
> http://billporter.smugmug.com/gallery/1436573
>
|
|
|
| Re: Over 90 new images in our Derby City photo gallery [message #1006701 ] |
Tue, 09 May 2006 01:38 |
|
<billporter1874 [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1147045094.196657.61360 [at] u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
>I just uploaded about 90 new images to our gallery of the 2005 Derby
> City Classic. When we first put the gallery up, a little over a year
> ago, we just uploaded 28 images. Interest in these photos has been much
> greater than I anticipated, so I went back to our original image files
> and uploaded all of them that were reasonably sharp and clear. There
> are now 120 images from the 2005 Derby City Classic; go check and see
> if you are in one of the photos.
>
> http://billporter.smugmug.com/gallery/1436573
>
Thanks once again, Bill.
Very Nice.
Roger
|
|
|
| Re: Over 90 new images in our Derby City photo gallery [message #1006712 ] |
Tue, 09 May 2006 04:35 |
|
Those are some nice shots Bill. What camera and lens were you using? I see a
little ISO noise but not bad at all.
|
|
|
| Re: Over 90 new images in our Derby City photo gallery [message #1006714 ] |
Tue, 09 May 2006 06:01 |
|
Those photos are awesome! Even without movement you can see their stroke.
Excellent quality.
Billiard Babe
"Keith" <noemailheresir [at] fu.com> wrote in message
news:dbb7c$445fffee$a666e954$14011 [at] ALLTEL.NET...
> Those are some nice shots Bill. What camera and lens were you using? I see
> a little ISO noise but not bad at all.
>
|
|
|
| Re: Over 90 new images in our Derby City photo gallery [message #1006719 ] |
Tue, 09 May 2006 13:13 |
|
I was using a Panasonic FZ20 and shooting with a 400 ISO setting. Some
people just won't use such a high ISO, but shooting a pool tournament
like DCC I don't think I had much choice. I just turned on "camera
details" on that Smugmug gallery, so you should now be able to see the
exif details. My buddy Mike Haines was using an Olympus C5050z and I
think he was going with ISO 400 as well. We did usually do a manual
white balance before shooting a match.
|
|
|
| Re: Over 90 new images in our Derby City photo gallery [message #1006743 ] |
Tue, 09 May 2006 19:07 |
|
Wow... I thought you took those with a SLR camera. Very nice...
<billporter1874 [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1147173182.895618.173460 [at] v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
>I was using a Panasonic FZ20 and shooting with a 400 ISO setting. Some
> people just won't use such a high ISO, but shooting a pool tournament
> like DCC I don't think I had much choice. I just turned on "camera
> details" on that Smugmug gallery, so you should now be able to see the
> exif details. My buddy Mike Haines was using an Olympus C5050z and I
> think he was going with ISO 400 as well. We did usually do a manual
> white balance before shooting a match.
>
|
|
|
