| Crusaders-Force halftime (spoiler) [message #982926] |
Fri, 21 April 2006 14:29 |
|
20-8 to the Force!
The Force *second-string* tight five forced a tight head!
shg
|
|
|
| Re: Crusaders-Force halftime (spoiler) [message #982933 ] |
Fri, 21 April 2006 15:38 |
|
"Simon H. Garlick" <not [at] this.address> wrote in news:124hk78kqv6ip86
[at] corp.supernews.com:
> 20-8 to the Force!
>
> The Force *second-string* tight five forced a tight head!
>
What a fucking game!
I'm off to bed.
--
Cheers, Os
|
|
|
| Re: Crusaders-Force halftime (spoiler) [message #982934 ] |
Fri, 21 April 2006 15:44 |
|
"Osbourne Ruddock" <strikeboy [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns97AD10A448253strikeboyhotmailcom [at] 130.133.1.4...
> "Simon H. Garlick" <not [at] this.address> wrote in news:124hk78kqv6ip86
> [at] corp.supernews.com:
>
>> 20-8 to the Force!
>>
>> The Force *second-string* tight five forced a tight head!
>>
>
> What a fucking game!
Fucken oath!
>
> I'm off to bed.
Amen.
|
|
|
| Re: Crusaders-Force halftime (spoiler) [message #982935 ] |
Fri, 21 April 2006 15:59 |
|
"Uncle Bully" <wakeupcall [at] optushome.com.au.REMOVE> wrote in message
news:4448e153$0$7858$afc38c87 [at] news.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "Osbourne Ruddock" <strikeboy [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns97AD10A448253strikeboyhotmailcom [at] 130.133.1.4...
>> "Simon H. Garlick" <not [at] this.address> wrote in news:124hk78kqv6ip86
>> [at] corp.supernews.com:
>>
>>> 20-8 to the Force!
>>>
>>> The Force *second-string* tight five forced a tight head!
>>>
>>
>> What a fucking game!
>
> Fucken oath!
>
>>
>> I'm off to bed.
>
>
> Amen.
The same Crusaders with whom 'no one will come close' ? Of all teams the
Force ?
Perhaps the crown has slipped further than even I thought
Codocks
|
|
|
| Re: Crusaders-Force halftime (spoiler) [message #982963 ] |
Fri, 21 April 2006 22:59 |
|
End result - 23 all (sure you already know this)
Crusaders don't like the pressure, do they? Even Carter was off his
game...
|
|
|
| Re: Crusaders-Force halftime (spoiler) [message #982964 ] |
Fri, 21 April 2006 23:12 |
|
On 21 Apr 2006 13:59:50 -0700, "Kozz" <richard.raudon [at] gmail.com>
wrote:
>End result - 23 all (sure you already know this)
>
>Crusaders don't like the pressure, do they? Even Carter was off his
>game...
Of course the cynical might say good buddies Deans and Mitchell might
have cooked it up over dinner previously in the week in order for the
Force to salvage some pride this season. Doesn't affect the Crusaders
chances at all, so call it a charity bonk, if you will.
--
greig
|
|
|
| Re: Crusaders-Force halftime (spoiler) [message #982966 ] |
Fri, 21 April 2006 23:27 |
|
"codocks" <codocks [at] optusnet.com.au> wrote in news:4448e52a$0$10677
$afc38c87 [at] news.optusnet.com.au:
> The same Crusaders with whom 'no one will come close' ? Of all teams
the
> Force ?
>
> Perhaps the crown has slipped further than even I thought
>
Three lower teams, The Cats, Sharks and Force have all taken to The
Crusaders from the starting whistle and given them a bit of a fright.
Higher ranked teams like the Waratahs and Hurricanes have started slowly
and been punished.
I guess the SAF'fers they're about to face now know how to approach their
games.
--
Cheers, Os
|
|
|
| Re: Crusaders-Force halftime (spoiler) [message #982968 ] |
Fri, 21 April 2006 23:49 |
|
"codocks" <codocks [at] optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:4448e52a$0$10677$afc38c87 [at] news.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "Uncle Bully" <wakeupcall [at] optushome.com.au.REMOVE> wrote in message
> news:4448e153$0$7858$afc38c87 [at] news.optusnet.com.au...
>>
>> "Osbourne Ruddock" <strikeboy [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns97AD10A448253strikeboyhotmailcom [at] 130.133.1.4...
>>> "Simon H. Garlick" <not [at] this.address> wrote in news:124hk78kqv6ip86
>>> [at] corp.supernews.com:
>>>
>>>> 20-8 to the Force!
>>>>
>>>> The Force *second-string* tight five forced a tight head!
>>>>
>>>
>>> What a fucking game!
>>
>> Fucken oath!
>>
>>>
>>> I'm off to bed.
>>
>>
>> Amen.
>
> The same Crusaders with whom 'no one will come close' ? Of all teams the
> Force ?
>
> Perhaps the crown has slipped further than even I thought
>
> Codocks
>
We'll see about that Cods.Just get your $50.00 ready.
Matua
|
|
|
| Re: Crusaders-Force halftime (spoiler) [message #982973 ] |
Sat, 22 April 2006 00:49 |
|
"codocks" <codocks [at] optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
news:4448e52a$0$10677$afc38c87 [at] news.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "Uncle Bully" <wakeupcall [at] optushome.com.au.REMOVE> wrote in message
> news:4448e153$0$7858$afc38c87 [at] news.optusnet.com.au...
>>
>> "Osbourne Ruddock" <strikeboy [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns97AD10A448253strikeboyhotmailcom [at] 130.133.1.4...
>>> "Simon H. Garlick" <not [at] this.address> wrote in news:124hk78kqv6ip86
>>> [at] corp.supernews.com:
>>>
>>>> 20-8 to the Force!
>>>>
>>>> The Force *second-string* tight five forced a tight head!
>>>>
>>>
>>> What a fucking game!
>>
>> Fucken oath!
>>
>>>
>>> I'm off to bed.
>>
>>
>> Amen.
>
> The same Crusaders with whom 'no one will come close' ? Of all teams the
> Force ?
>
> Perhaps the crown has slipped further than even I thought
Nope. Still #1, still undefeated, still favourites to win the competition
again. If that is slipping, what terms do you use to describe every other
team?
|
|
|
| Re: Crusaders-Force halftime (spoiler) [message #982974 ] |
Sat, 22 April 2006 00:52 |
|
"Uncle Bully" <wakeupcall [at] optushome.com.au.REMOVE> wrote in message
news:4449611b$0$7532$afc38c87 [at] news.optusnet.com.au...
>
> "codocks" <codocks [at] optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
> news:4448e52a$0$10677$afc38c87 [at] news.optusnet.com.au...
>>
>> "Uncle Bully" <wakeupcall [at] optushome.com.au.REMOVE> wrote in message
>> news:4448e153$0$7858$afc38c87 [at] news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>
>>> "Osbourne Ruddock" <strikeboy [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:Xns97AD10A448253strikeboyhotmailcom [at] 130.133.1.4...
>>>> "Simon H. Garlick" <not [at] this.address> wrote in news:124hk78kqv6ip86
>>>> [at] corp.supernews.com:
>>>>
>>>>> 20-8 to the Force!
>>>>>
>>>>> The Force *second-string* tight five forced a tight head!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What a fucking game!
>>>
>>> Fucken oath!
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'm off to bed.
>>>
>>>
>>> Amen.
>>
>> The same Crusaders with whom 'no one will come close' ? Of all teams the
>> Force ?
>>
>> Perhaps the crown has slipped further than even I thought
>
> Nope. Still #1, still undefeated, still favourites to win the competition
> again. If that is slipping, what terms do you use to describe every other
> team?
term would be " capable of beating the force"
|
|
|
| Re: Crusaders-Force halftime (spoiler) [message #983002 ] |
Sat, 22 April 2006 09:39 |
|
"Will_S" <spam [at] ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
news:44496242$0$12134$5a62ac22 [at] per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
>
> "Uncle Bully" <wakeupcall [at] optushome.com.au.REMOVE> wrote in message
> news:4449611b$0$7532$afc38c87 [at] news.optusnet.com.au...
>>
>> "codocks" <codocks [at] optusnet.com.au> wrote in message
>> news:4448e52a$0$10677$afc38c87 [at] news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>
>>> "Uncle Bully" <wakeupcall [at] optushome.com.au.REMOVE> wrote in message
>>> news:4448e153$0$7858$afc38c87 [at] news.optusnet.com.au...
>>>>
>>>> "Osbourne Ruddock" <strikeboy [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:Xns97AD10A448253strikeboyhotmailcom [at] 130.133.1.4...
>>>>> "Simon H. Garlick" <not [at] this.address> wrote in news:124hk78kqv6ip86
>>>>> [at] corp.supernews.com:
>>>>>
>>>>>> 20-8 to the Force!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The Force *second-string* tight five forced a tight head!
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What a fucking game!
>>>>
>>>> Fucken oath!
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm off to bed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Amen.
>>>
>>> The same Crusaders with whom 'no one will come close' ? Of all teams the
>>> Force ?
>>>
>>> Perhaps the crown has slipped further than even I thought
>>
>> Nope. Still #1, still undefeated, still favourites to win the competition
>> again. If that is slipping, what terms do you use to describe every other
>> team?
>
> term would be " capable of beating the force"
>
Would have loved to see the force win that game good on them for sticking it
up the golden boys of the S14.
However lets be honest it was a nothing game for the Crusaders and a yard
stick to measure themselves by for the force.
They were below par and the force was on fire ... still I tend to think that
might wake Crusaders up for remaining games in S14.
|
|
|
| Re: Crusaders-Force halftime (spoiler) [message #983122 ] |
Mon, 24 April 2006 11:58 |
|
>> The same Crusaders with whom 'no one will come close' ? Of all teams the
>> Force ?
>>
>> Perhaps the crown has slipped further than even I thought
>>
>> Codocks
>>
>
> We'll see about that Cods.Just get your $50.00 ready.
>
> Matua
I'm calm, but this NG is crawling with nervous Kiwis bro'..........you know
it
Codocks
|
|
|
