|
Sports » rec.sport.basketball.college » Definition of "thole"
| Definition of "thole" [message #979329] |
Fri, 28 April 2006 22:45 |
|
|
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=thole
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979353 ] |
Sat, 29 April 2006 03:51 |
|
<tholen.is.a.troll [at] gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1146257151.574829.263010 [at] u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=thole
>
Brilliant!
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979356 ] |
Sat, 29 April 2006 03:58 |
|
tholen.is.a.troll [at] gmail.com wrote:
> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=thole
Brilliant!
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979362 ] |
Sat, 29 April 2006 05:41 |
|
tholen.is.a.troll [at] gmail.com wrote:
> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=thole
Good to see that it recognizes the modern definitions of "thole", and that
the definition Tholen always cites has been antiquated.
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979374 ] |
Sun, 30 April 2006 00:01 |
|
Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:
> tholen.is.a.troll [at] gmail.com wrote:
> > http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=thole
>
> Brilliant!
The rating is now "6 up, 1 down" - any guesses on who is the dissenting
opinion? ;-)
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979376 ] |
Sun, 30 April 2006 01:14 |
|
tholingale wrote:
> tholen.is.a.troll [at] gmail.com wrote:
>
>> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=thole
>
> Good to see that it recognizes the modern definitions of "thole", and that
> the definition Tholen always cites has been antiquated.
Hey, that's wonderful! Now even *Tholen* will have to agree that he's
the perfect tholener!
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979377 ] |
Sun, 30 April 2006 01:16 |
|
bisectional2006 [at] gmail.com wrote:
>
> Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:
> > tholen.is.a.troll [at] gmail.com wrote:
> > > http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=thole
> >
> > Brilliant!
>
> The rating is now "6 up, 1 down" - any guesses on who is the dissenting
> opinion? ;-)
Well one person has been on usenet since this thread was started, and another
has not.
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979378 ] |
Sun, 30 April 2006 01:33 |
|
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 18:16:43 -0500, tholingale <tholingale> wrote in
alt.usenet.kooks:
> Well one person has been on usenet since this thread was started,
> and another has not.
At least one imitative Usenet poster has been OWNED by Nightingale
since this thread was started, and at least one other has not.
I'm rather fond of Davie Tholen. In his strange and somewhat
repetitive way, he adds more to the gaiety of Usenet than you do with
your one-string banjo. So why do you attack Nightingale instead of me?
Are you scared of me?
PJR :-)
--
_ _(o)_(o)_ _ FSM: http://www.venganza.org/
.._\`:_ F S M _:' \_, PJR: http://www.insurgent.org/~pjr/
/ (`---'\ `-. AUK: http://www.netcabal.com/auk/
,-` _) (_, F_P God's Own Newsreader: http://www.slrn.org/
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979381 ] |
Sun, 30 April 2006 04:14 |
|
"Peter J Ross" <pjr [at] kookbusters.org> wrote in message
news:slrne57u0n.bst.pjr [at] nntp.alcatroll.com...
> On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 18:16:43 -0500, tholingale <tholingale> wrote in
> alt.usenet.kooks:
>
> > Well one person has been on usenet since this thread was started,
> > and another has not.
>
> At least one imitative Usenet poster has been OWNED by Nightingale
> since this thread was started, and at least one other has not.
>
> I'm rather fond of Davie Tholen. In his strange and somewhat
> repetitive way, he adds more to the gaiety of Usenet than you do with
> your one-string banjo. So why do you attack Nightingale instead of me?
> Are you scared of me?
>
>
> PJR :-)
It's surely not fear. It's more like avoiding stepping in a big pile of dog
shit.
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979385 ] |
Sun, 30 April 2006 05:13 |
|
Peewee AKA Peter J Ross wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 18:16:43 -0500, tholingale <tholingale> wrote in
> alt.usenet.kooks:
>
> > Well one person has been on usenet since this thread was started,
> > and another has not.
>
> At least one imitative Usenet poster has been OWNED by Nightingale
> since this thread was started, and at least one other has not.
>
> I'm rather fond of Davie Tholen. In his strange and somewhat
> repetitive way, he adds more to the gaiety of Usenet than you do with
> your one-string banjo. So why do you attack Nightingale instead of me?
> Are you scared of me?
That's rich coming from the gutless coward who admitted to killfiling
me.
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979386 ] |
Sun, 30 April 2006 05:15 |
|
Bruce AKA the alleged jmalloy wrote:
> tholingale wrote:
> > tholen.is.a.troll [at] gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=thole
> >
> > Good to see that it recognizes the modern definitions of "thole", and that
> > the definition Tholen always cites has been antiquated.
>
> Hey, that's wonderful! Now even *Tholen* will have to agree that he's
> the perfect tholener!
Yes, Bruce, now that its in a dictionary, its "official". I'd like to
see Dickless worm his way out of that.
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979387 ] |
Sun, 30 April 2006 05:15 |
|
Bruce AKA bisectional2006 [at] gmail.com wrote:
> Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:
> > tholen.is.a.troll [at] gmail.com wrote:
> > > http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=thole
> >
> > Brilliant!
>
> The rating is now "6 up, 1 down" - any guesses on who is the dissenting
> opinion? ;-)
8 to 2 now, Bruce. And we all know who the "2" are.
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979389 ] |
Sun, 30 April 2006 06:11 |
|
Peter J Ross wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 18:16:43 -0500, tholingale <tholingale> wrote in
> alt.usenet.kooks:
>
> > Well one person has been on usenet since this thread was started,
> > and another has not.
>
> At least one imitative Usenet poster has been OWNED by Nightingale
> since this thread was started, and at least one other has not.
>
> I'm rather fond of Davie Tholen.
When you say "Davie Tholen", do you mean Davie Tholen?
> In his strange and somewhat
> repetitive way, he adds more to the gaiety of Usenet than you do with
> your one-string banjo.
You erroneously presuppose that I have a one-string banjo.
> So why do you attack Nightingale instead of me?
On what basis do you believe that I attacked Nightingale in my post to which
you responded?
> Are you scared of me?
No, since I do not have any history with you.
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979390 ] |
Sun, 30 April 2006 06:25 |
|
Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:
> Bruce AKA the alleged jmalloy wrote:
> > tholingale wrote:
> > > tholen.is.a.troll [at] gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > >> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=thole
> > >
> > > Good to see that it recognizes the modern definitions of "thole", and
> > > that the definition Tholen always cites has been antiquated.
> >
> > Hey, that's wonderful! Now even *Tholen* will have to agree that he's
> > the perfect tholener!
>
> Yes, Bruce, now that its in a dictionary, its "official". I'd like to
> see Dickless worm his way out of that.
urbandictionary.com is such a reputable site that a Judge actually cited it
in a court decision:
http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/story/240748p-20647 7c.html
"But, so far, the most prominent user of his site is a British High Court
judge, Kim Lewison, who cited the UrbanDictionary last year when ruling on a
copyright case involving rap lyrics."
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979392 ] |
Sun, 30 April 2006 10:43 |
|
tholingale wrote:
> Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:
>
> > Bruce AKA the alleged jmalloy wrote:
> > > tholingale wrote:
> > > > tholen.is.a.troll [at] gmail.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=thole
> > > >
> > > > Good to see that it recognizes the modern definitions of "thole", and
> > > > that the definition Tholen always cites has been antiquated.
> > >
> > > Hey, that's wonderful! Now even *Tholen* will have to agree that he's
> > > the perfect tholener!
> >
> > Yes, Bruce, now that its in a dictionary, its "official". I'd like to
> > see Dickless worm his way out of that.
>
> urbandictionary.com is such a reputable site that a Judge actually cited it
> in a court decision:
>
> http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/story/240748p-20647 7c.html
You can't get any more official than that.
> "But, so far, the most prominent user of his site is a British High Court
> judge, Kim Lewison, who cited the UrbanDictionary last year when ruling on a
> copyright case involving rap lyrics."
I wonder how long before others start citing this?
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=dickless
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979396 ] |
Mon, 01 May 2006 00:23 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979402 ] |
Mon, 01 May 2006 03:29 |
|
Mike wrote:
> In article <1146366915.201855.152960 [at] g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
> "Michael Baldwin, Bruce" <mbbr [at] mighty.co.za> wrote:
>
> > Bruce AKA the alleged jmalloy wrote:
> > > tholingale wrote:
> > > > tholen.is.a.troll [at] gmail.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=thole
> > > >
> > > > Good to see that it recognizes the modern definitions of "thole", and that
> > > > the definition Tholen always cites has been antiquated.
> > >
> > > Hey, that's wonderful! Now even *Tholen* will have to agree that he's
> > > the perfect tholener!
> >
> > Yes, Bruce, now that its in a dictionary, its "official". I'd like to
> > see Dickless worm his way out of that.
>
> He'll dismiss it, of course. "Classic personal attack, laced with
> invective", or some such Tholenesque gibberish.
I don't know what Dickless' problem is, but I bet its hard to pronounce.
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979403 ] |
Mon, 01 May 2006 03:47 |
|
Mike wrote:
> In article <1146366915.201855.152960 [at] g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
> "Michael Baldwin, Bruce" <mbbr [at] mighty.co.za> wrote:
>
> > Bruce AKA the alleged jmalloy wrote:
> > > tholingale wrote:
> > > > tholen.is.a.troll [at] gmail.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=thole
> > > >
> > > > Good to see that it recognizes the modern definitions of "thole", and
> > > > that the definition Tholen always cites has been antiquated.
> > >
> > > Hey, that's wonderful! Now even Tholen will have to agree that he's
> > > the perfect tholener!
> >
> > Yes, Bruce, now that its in a dictionary, its "official". I'd like to
> > see Dickless worm his way out of that.
>
> He'll dismiss it, of course. "Classic personal attack, laced with
> invective", or some such Tholenesque gibberish.
>
> Mike
Why have you requested that your post not be archived, Mike? Even Tholen is
not afraid to have his frequent unsubstantiated and erroneous claims archived
for public record.
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979408 ] |
Mon, 01 May 2006 04:20 |
|
"Michael Baldwin, Bruce" <mbbr [at] mighty.co.za> wrote in message
news:1146275929.476827.168910 [at] i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> tholen.is.a.troll [at] gmail.com wrote:
> > http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=thole
>
> Brilliant!
>
Not so brilliant to have 2 of your sock puppets make the exact same post,
Bruce.
--
Sumer is icumen in,
Lhude sing, cuccu!
Groweth sed and bloweth med
And springth the wude nu.
Sing, cuccu!
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979409 ] |
Mon, 01 May 2006 04:17 |
|
"Nightingale loves Tholen" <unrequited [at] antispam.ham> wrote in message
news:4452c69b$0$79450$892e7fe2 [at] authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...
>
> <tholen.is.a.troll [at] gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1146257151.574829.263010 [at] u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
> > http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=thole
> >
>
> Brilliant!
>
>
I see you've managed to fool 10 people into thinking that you are correct -
apparently there are a lot of idiots reading this thread.
--
Sumer is icumen in,
Lhude sing, cuccu!
Groweth sed and bloweth med
And springth the wude nu.
Sing, cuccu!
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979410 ] |
Mon, 01 May 2006 04:23 |
|
<tholingale> wrote in message
news:xn0elj1x762kku000 [at] newsgroups.comcast.net...
> tholen.is.a.troll [at] gmail.com wrote:
>
> > http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=thole
>
> Good to see that it recognizes the modern definitions of "thole", and that
> the definition Tholen always cites has been antiquated.
The whole dictionary is worthless, and the definition is completely stupid.
The definition Tholen cites is the correct one.
--
Sumer is icumen in,
Lhude sing, cuccu!
Groweth sed and bloweth med
And springth the wude nu.
Sing, cuccu!
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979412 ] |
Mon, 01 May 2006 04:26 |
|
Nightingale tholed:
>
> "Nightingale loves Tholen" <unrequited [at] antispam.ham> wrote in message
> news:4452c69b$0$79450$892e7fe2 [at] authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...
> >
> > <tholen.is.a.troll [at] gmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:1146257151.574829.263010 [at] u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
> > > http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=thole
> > >
> >
> > Brilliant!
> >
> >
>
> I see you've managed to fool 10 people into thinking that you are correct -
Classic erroneous presupposition that anyone has fooled anyone into thinking
anything.
> apparently there are a lot of idiots reading this thread.
Only one idiot has bothered to post to this thread, and she just made 2 posts.
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979414 ] |
Mon, 01 May 2006 04:30 |
|
Nightingale wrote:
> <tholingale> wrote in message
> news:xn0elj1x762kku000 [at] newsgroups.comcast.net...
> > tholen.is.a.troll [at] gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > > http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=thole
> >
> > Good to see that it recognizes the modern definitions of "thole", and that
> > the definition Tholen always cites has been antiquated.
>
> The whole dictionary is worthless,
Ask the British High Court if they think that dictionary is worthless,
Nightingale.
> and the definition is completely stupid.
What you think about the definition is irrelevant, Nightingale. What matters
is that the definition is correct.
> The definition Tholen cites is the correct one.
The definition that Tholen cites is *a* correct one, however, it is archaic.
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979415 ] |
Mon, 01 May 2006 04:32 |
|
<tholingale> wrote in message
news:xn0ellt3j6zmg6000 [at] newsgroups.comcast.net...
> Nightingale tholed:
>
> >
> > "Nightingale loves Tholen" <unrequited [at] antispam.ham> wrote in message
> > news:4452c69b$0$79450$892e7fe2 [at] authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...
> > >
> > > <tholen.is.a.troll [at] gmail.com> wrote in message
> > > news:1146257151.574829.263010 [at] u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
> > > > http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=thole
> > > >
> > >
> > > Brilliant!
> > >
> > >
> >
> > I see you've managed to fool 10 people into thinking that you are
correct -
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition that anyone has fooled anyone into
thinking
> anything.
>
>
> > apparently there are a lot of idiots reading this thread.
>
> Only one idiot has bothered to post to this thread, and she just made 2
posts.
This thread was started by an idiot, and most of the people who have posted
in this thread are also idiots. It's amazing how many stupid people have
found their way onto usenet.
--
Sumer is icumen in,
Lhude sing, cuccu!
Groweth sed and bloweth med
And springth the wude nu.
Sing, cuccu!
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979416 ] |
Mon, 01 May 2006 04:36 |
|
"Peter J Ross" <pjr [at] kookbusters.org> wrote in message
news:slrne57u0n.bst.pjr [at] nntp.alcatroll.com...
> On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 18:16:43 -0500, tholingale <tholingale> wrote in
> alt.usenet.kooks:
>
> > Well one person has been on usenet since this thread was started,
> > and another has not.
>
> At least one imitative Usenet poster has been OWNED by Nightingale
Can I get a refund?
> since this thread was started, and at least one other has not.
>
> I'm rather fond of Davie Tholen.
Me2
> In his strange and somewhat
> repetitive way, he adds more to the gaiety of Usenet than you do with
> your one-string banjo. So why do you attack Nightingale instead of me?
And why does he/she attack Tholen? Tholen's done nothing to deserve all
this crap.
> Are you scared of me?
>
Probably.
--
Sumer is icumen in,
Lhude sing, cuccu!
Groweth sed and bloweth med
And springth the wude nu.
Sing, cuccu!
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979417 ] |
Mon, 01 May 2006 04:39 |
|
Nightingale tholed:
>
> <tholingale> wrote in message
> news:xn0ellt3j6zmg6000 [at] newsgroups.comcast.net...
> > Nightingale tholed:
> >
> > >
> > > "Nightingale loves Tholen" <unrequited [at] antispam.ham> wrote in message
> > > news:4452c69b$0$79450$892e7fe2 [at] authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...
> > > >
> > > > <tholen.is.a.troll [at] gmail.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:1146257151.574829.263010 [at] u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
> > > > > http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=thole
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Brilliant!
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > I see you've managed to fool 10 people into thinking that you are
> correct -
> >
> > Classic erroneous presupposition that anyone has fooled anyone into
> thinking
> > anything.
> >
> >
> > > apparently there are a lot of idiots reading this thread.
> >
> > Only one idiot has bothered to post to this thread, and she just made 2
> posts.
>
> This thread was started by an idiot,
On what basis do you make that claim, Nightingale?
>and most of the people who have posted in this thread are also idiots.
On the contrary, most of the people who have posted in this thread have
proven themselves to be highly intelligent and logical individuals.
> It's amazing how many stupid people have found their way onto usenet.
Yes, I am amazed that you and Tholen were somehow able to figure out how to
use a newsreader.
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979418 ] |
Mon, 01 May 2006 04:39 |
|
"Michael Baldwin, Bruce" <mbbr [at] mighty.co.za> wrote in message
news:1146366915.201855.152960 [at] g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Bruce AKA the alleged jmalloy wrote:
> > tholingale wrote:
> > > tholen.is.a.troll [at] gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > >> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=thole
> > >
> > > Good to see that it recognizes the modern definitions of "thole", and
that
> > > the definition Tholen always cites has been antiquated.
> >
> > Hey, that's wonderful! Now even *Tholen* will have to agree that he's
> > the perfect tholener!
>
> Yes, Bruce, now that its in a dictionary, its "official". I'd like to
> see Dickless worm his way out of that.
>
It's not a real dictionary.
--
Sumer is icumen in,
Lhude sing, cuccu!
Groweth sed and bloweth med
And springth the wude nu.
Sing, cuccu!
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979419 ] |
Mon, 01 May 2006 04:42 |
|
<tholingale> wrote in message
news:xn0ellt7a752f0001 [at] newsgroups.comcast.net...
> Nightingale wrote:
>
> > <tholingale> wrote in message
> > news:xn0elj1x762kku000 [at] newsgroups.comcast.net...
> > > tholen.is.a.troll [at] gmail.com wrote:
> > >
> > > > http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=thole
> > >
> > > Good to see that it recognizes the modern definitions of "thole", and
that
> > > the definition Tholen always cites has been antiquated.
> >
> > The whole dictionary is worthless,
>
> Ask the British High Court if they think that dictionary is worthless,
> Nightingale.
>
>
> > and the definition is completely stupid.
>
> What you think about the definition is irrelevant, Nightingale. What
matters
> is that the definition is correct.
>
>
You have not proven that the definition is correct. Are you the "David
James" who created it?
> > The definition Tholen cites is the correct one.
>
> The definition that Tholen cites is *a* correct one, however, it is
archaic.
--
Sumer is icumen in,
Lhude sing, cuccu!
Groweth sed and bloweth med
And springth the wude nu.
Sing, cuccu!
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979420 ] |
Mon, 01 May 2006 04:46 |
|
<tholingale> wrote in message
news:xn0elltfb7gnt5002 [at] newsgroups.comcast.net...
> Nightingale tholed:
>
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> >
> > <tholingale> wrote in message
> > news:xn0ellt3j6zmg6000 [at] newsgroups.comcast.net...
> > > Nightingale tholed:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > "Nightingale loves Tholen" <unrequited [at] antispam.ham> wrote in
message
> > > > news:4452c69b$0$79450$892e7fe2 [at] authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...
> > > > >
> > > > > <tholen.is.a.troll [at] gmail.com> wrote in message
> > > > > news:1146257151.574829.263010 [at] u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
> > > > > > http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=thole
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Brilliant!
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > I see you've managed to fool 10 people into thinking that you are
> > correct -
> > >
> > > Classic erroneous presupposition that anyone has fooled anyone into
> > thinking
> > > anything.
> > >
> > >
> > > > apparently there are a lot of idiots reading this thread.
> > >
> > > Only one idiot has bothered to post to this thread, and she just made
2
> > posts.
> >
> > This thread was started by an idiot,
>
> On what basis do you make that claim, Nightingale?
>
>
> >and most of the people who have posted in this thread are also idiots.
>
> On the contrary, most of the people who have posted in this thread have
> proven themselves to be highly intelligent and logical individuals.
>
>
Another erroneous claim. Most of the people who posted in this thread,
including the one who started it, are trolls.
> > It's amazing how many stupid people have found their way onto usenet.
>
> Yes, I am amazed that you and Tholen were somehow able to figure out how
to
> use a newsreader.
At least we aren't posting from google.
--
Sumer is icumen in,
Lhude sing, cuccu!
Groweth sed and bloweth med
And springth the wude nu.
Sing, cuccu!
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979421 ] |
Mon, 01 May 2006 04:48 |
|
Nightingale tholed:
> <tholingale> wrote in message
> news:xn0ellt7a752f0001 [at] newsgroups.comcast.net...
> > Nightingale wrote:
> >
> > > <tholingale> wrote in message
> > > news:xn0elj1x762kku000 [at] newsgroups.comcast.net...
> > > > tholen.is.a.troll [at] gmail.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=thole
> > > >
> > > > Good to see that it recognizes the modern definitions of "thole", and
> that
> > > > the definition Tholen always cites has been antiquated.
> > >
> > > The whole dictionary is worthless,
> >
> > Ask the British High Court if they think that dictionary is worthless,
> > Nightingale.
Note: no response.
> > > and the definition is completely stupid.
> >
> > What you think about the definition is irrelevant, Nightingale. What
> matters
> > is that the definition is correct.
> >
> >
>
> You have not proven that the definition is correct.
You are the one who has challenged the definition, Nightingale, so the burden
of proof is on you to prove that it is incorrect.
> Are you the "David James" who created it?
No.
> > > The definition Tholen cites is the correct one.
> >
> > The definition that Tholen cites is a correct one, however, it is archaic.
Note: no response.
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979423 ] |
Mon, 01 May 2006 04:51 |
|
"Mike" <abc [at] def.ghi> wrote in message
news:abc-D73F60.18233830042006 [at] sn-indi.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net...
> In article <1146366915.201855.152960 [at] g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
> "Michael Baldwin, Bruce" <mbbr [at] mighty.co.za> wrote:
>
> > Bruce AKA the alleged jmalloy wrote:
> > > tholingale wrote:
> > > > tholen.is.a.troll [at] gmail.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=thole
> > > >
> > > > Good to see that it recognizes the modern definitions of "thole",
and that
> > > > the definition Tholen always cites has been antiquated.
> > >
> > > Hey, that's wonderful! Now even *Tholen* will have to agree that he's
> > > the perfect tholener!
> >
> > Yes, Bruce, now that its in a dictionary, its "official". I'd like to
> > see Dickless worm his way out of that.
>
> He'll dismiss it, of course. "Classic personal attack, laced with
> invective", or some such Tholenesque gibberish.
>
Not gibberish - he will be quite correct to dismiss it.
--
Sumer is icumen in,
Lhude sing, cuccu!
Groweth sed and bloweth med
And springth the wude nu.
Sing, cuccu!
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979424 ] |
Mon, 01 May 2006 04:55 |
|
Nightingale tholed:
> <tholingale> wrote in message
> news:xn0elltfb7gnt5002 [at] newsgroups.comcast.net...
> > Nightingale tholed:
> >
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Prove it, if you think you can, Nightingale.
>
> > >
> > > <tholingale> wrote in message
> > > news:xn0ellt3j6zmg6000 [at] newsgroups.comcast.net...
> > > > Nightingale tholed:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > "Nightingale loves Tholen" <unrequited [at] antispam.ham> wrote in
> message
> > > > > news:4452c69b$0$79450$892e7fe2 [at] authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...
> > > > > >
> > > > > > <tholen.is.a.troll [at] gmail.com> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:1146257151.574829.263010 [at] u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
> > > > > > > http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=thole
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Brilliant!
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I see you've managed to fool 10 people into thinking that you are
> > > correct -
> > > >
> > > > Classic erroneous presupposition that anyone has fooled anyone into
> > > thinking
> > > > anything.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > apparently there are a lot of idiots reading this thread.
> > > >
> > > > Only one idiot has bothered to post to this thread, and she just made
> 2
> > > posts.
> > >
> > > This thread was started by an idiot,
> >
> > On what basis do you make that claim, Nightingale?
Note: no response.
> >
> >
> > > and most of the people who have posted in this thread are also idiots.
> >
> > On the contrary, most of the people who have posted in this thread have
> > proven themselves to be highly intelligent and logical individuals.
> >
> >
>
> Another erroneous claim.
Prove it, if you think you can, Nightingale.
> Most of the people who posted in this thread,
> including the one who started it, are trolls.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> > > It's amazing how many stupid people have found their way onto usenet.
> >
> > Yes, I am amazed that you and Tholen were somehow able to figure out how
> to
> > use a newsreader.
>
> At least we aren't posting from google.
Neither am I, Nightingale.
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979425 ] |
Mon, 01 May 2006 05:15 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979426 ] |
Mon, 01 May 2006 05:23 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979427 ] |
Mon, 01 May 2006 05:29 |
|
Mike wrote:
> In article <xn0ells225mj6m000 [at] newsgroups.comcast.net>,
> "tholingale" <tholingale> wrote:
>
> > Why have you requested that your post not be archived, Mike? Even Tholen
> > is not afraid to have his frequent unsubstantiated and erroneous claims
> > archived for public record.
>
> Um, because I don't think these pearls of useless trivia are worthy of
> archiving?
You erroneously think that they are useless, Mike.
> A better question is why did you cut out all of the groups that were
> originally on my message? Of course, I added them back on this reply.
I did not cut out any groups, Mike.
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979428 ] |
Mon, 01 May 2006 05:36 |
|
"Mike" <abc [at] def.ghi> wrote in message
news:abc-6A0E47.23234930042006 [at] sn-indi.vsrv-sjc.supernews.net...
> > --
> > Sumer is icumen in,
> > Lhude sing, cuccu!
> > Groweth sed and bloweth med
> > And springth the wude nu.
> > Sing, cuccu!
>
> Leopold (Jose Ferrer) said this in Woody Allen's "A Midsummer Night's
> Sex Comedy". What's the original attribution?
http://www.auburn.edu/~bertocr/Sumer.html
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979429 ] |
Mon, 01 May 2006 05:38 |
|
<tholingale> wrote in message
news:xn0ellurs99lu9005 [at] newsgroups.comcast.net...
> Mike wrote:
>
> > In article <xn0ells225mj6m000 [at] newsgroups.comcast.net>,
> > "tholingale" <tholingale> wrote:
> >
> > > Why have you requested that your post not be archived, Mike? Even
Tholen
> > > is not afraid to have his frequent unsubstantiated and erroneous
claims
> > > archived for public record.
> >
> > Um, because I don't think these pearls of useless trivia are worthy of
> > archiving?
>
> You erroneously think that they are useless, Mike.
>
>
Mike's evaluation of his own post was accurate.
> > A better question is why did you cut out all of the groups that were
> > originally on my message? Of course, I added them back on this reply.
>
> I did not cut out any groups, Mike.
You set a follow up.
--
Sumer is icumen in,
Lhude sing, cuccu!
Groweth sed and bloweth med
And springth the wude nu.
Sing, cuccu!
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979430 ] |
Mon, 01 May 2006 06:24 |
|
Nightingale wrote:
> <tholingale> wrote in message
> news:xn0ellurs99lu9005 [at] newsgroups.comcast.net...
> > Mike wrote:
> >
> > > In article <xn0ells225mj6m000 [at] newsgroups.comcast.net>,
> > > "tholingale" <tholingale> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Why have you requested that your post not be archived, Mike? Even
> Tholen
> > > > is not afraid to have his frequent unsubstantiated and erroneous
> claims
> > > > archived for public record.
> > >
> > > Um, because I don't think these pearls of useless trivia are worthy of
> > > archiving?
> >
> > You erroneously think that they are useless, Mike.
> >
> >
>
> Mike's evaluation of his own post was accurate.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> > > A better question is why did you cut out all of the groups that were
> > > originally on my message? Of course, I added them back on this reply.
> >
> > I did not cut out any groups, Mike.
>
> You set a follow up.
Thank you for pointing that out, Nightingale.
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979433 ] |
Mon, 01 May 2006 06:48 |
|
Nightingale tholed:
> "Peter J Ross" <pjr [at] kookbusters.org> wrote in message
> news:slrne57u0n.bst.pjr [at] nntp.alcatroll.com...
> > On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 18:16:43 -0500, tholingale <tholingale> wrote in
> > alt.usenet.kooks:
> >
> > > Well one person has been on usenet since this thread was started,
> > > and another has not.
> >
> > At least one imitative Usenet poster has been OWNED by Nightingale
>
> Can I get a refund?
>
> > since this thread was started, and at least one other has not.
> >
> > I'm rather fond of Davie Tholen.
>
> Me2
I thought you called Davie Tholen a troll?
> > In his strange and somewhat
> > repetitive way, he adds more to the gaiety of Usenet than you do with
> > your one-string banjo. So why do you attack Nightingale instead of me?
>
> And why does he/she attack Tholen?
On what basis do you claim that someone has attacked Tholen?
> Tholen's done nothing to deserve all this crap.
What alleged crap are you referring to?
> > Are you scared of me?
> >
>
> Probably.
Why are you probably scared of Ross, Nightingale?
|
|
|
| Re: Definition of "thole" [message #979434 ] |
Mon, 01 May 2006 06:50 |
|
Nightingale wrote:
>
> "Michael Baldwin, Bruce" <mbbr [at] mighty.co.za> wrote in message
> news:1146366915.201855.152960 [at] g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> > Bruce AKA the alleged jmalloy wrote:
> > > tholingale wrote:
> > > > tholen.is.a.troll [at] gmail.com wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=thole
> > > >
> > > > Good to see that it recognizes the modern definitions of "thole", and
> that
> > > > the definition Tholen always cites has been antiquated.
> > >
> > > Hey, that's wonderful! Now even Tholen will have to agree that he's
> > > the perfect tholener!
> >
> > Yes, Bruce, now that its in a dictionary, its "official". I'd like to
> > see Dickless worm his way out of that.
> >
>
> It's not a real dictionary.
The opinion of the British High Court is much more credible than yours,
Nightingale.
|
|
|
Gehe zu:
aktuelle Zeit: Thu Jan 8 16:54:28 CET 2009
Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0.15727 Sekunden |
