|
Sports » rec.sport.basketball.college » To the Pavlovian Mutt
| To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979042] |
Mon, 24 April 2006 23:50 |
|
Please stop posting to this newsgroup.
Thank you.
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979044 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 02:04 |
|
tholingale wrote:
> Please stop posting to this newsgroup.
Which group is "this newsgroup", tholingale?
> Thank you.
Non sequitur.
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979046 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 02:19 |
|
tholingale <tholingale> writes:
> Please stop posting to this newsgroup.
You posted your request to three different newsgroups, therefore your
usage of "this" is both incorrect and ambiguous.
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979052 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 03:03 |
|
tholen tholed:
>tholingale <tholingale> writes:
>
>> Please stop posting to this newsgroup.
>
>You posted your request to three different newsgroups, therefore your
>usage of "this" is both incorrect and ambiguous.
Classic pontification.
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979053 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 04:50 |
|
<tholen [at] antispam.ham> wrote in message
news:444d6787$0$14993$892e7fe2 [at] authen.yellow.readfreenews.net...
> tholingale wrote:
>> Please stop posting to this newsgroup.
>
> Which group is "this newsgroup", tholingale?
Whichever newsgroup in which you read the message, Tholen AKA Pavlovian
Mutt.
>
>> Thank you.
>
> Non sequitur.
On the contrary.
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979054 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 04:52 |
|
<tholen [at] antispam.ham> AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote in message
news:KWd3g.14301$3W1.9915 [at] tornado.socal.rr.com...
> tholingale <tholingale> writes:
>
>> Please stop posting to this newsgroup.
>
> You posted your request to three different newsgroups, therefore your
> usage of "this" is both incorrect and ambiguous.
At least I cross-posted to three different newsgroups, unlike you, who
posted two different replies to my post.
And thank you for acknowledging that you are the Pavlovian Mutt by
responding to my thread.
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979059 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 08:03 |
|
tholingale wrote:
> Please stop posting to this newsgroup.
>
> Thank you.
Are you talkin' to me?
.....
Are you talkin' to me?
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979062 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 09:31 |
|
Dickless Davie tholen [at] antispam.ham the irrelevant Ignoranus whined and
tholed:
> tholingale <tholingale> writes:
>
> > Please stop posting to this newsgroup.
>
> You posted your request to three different newsgroups, therefore your
> usage of "this" is both incorrect and ambiguous.
"Clasic" "pontfication" on your part, Dickless.
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979069 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 17:03 |
|
tholingale wrote:
>
> At least I cross-posted to three different newsgroups, unlike you, who
> posted two different replies to my post.
>
Zero points for knowing how to read headers: Tholen only made one reply.
--
Blessed Cecilia, appear in visions
To all musicians, appear and inspire:
Translated Daughter, come down and startle
Composing mortals with immortal fire.
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979075 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 19:31 |
|
Nightingale wrote:
> tholingale wrote:
> >
> > At least I cross-posted to three different newsgroups, unlike you, who
> > posted two different replies to my post.
> >
>
> Zero points for knowing how to read headers: Tholen only made one reply.
Different headers does not necessarily mean different posters. You should
know that, Nightingale. Can you prove that Tholen made only one reply?
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979076 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 20:15 |
|
tholingale <tholingale> writes:
>>> Please stop posting to this newsgroup.
>> You posted your request to three different newsgroups, therefore your
>> usage of "this" is both incorrect and ambiguous.
> At least I cross-posted to three different newsgroups,
Glad to see you acknowledge your trolling behavior, tholingale.
> unlike you,
Glad to see you realize that I did not engage in any trolling
behavior, tholingale.
> who posted two different replies to my post.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> And thank you for acknowledging that you are the Pavlovian Mutt by
> responding to my thread.
Classic erroneous presupposition. Michael Baldwin Bruce, Manco, and
dizzy also responded to your thread, which by your illogic, must
mean that they are also the Pavlovian Mutt.
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979082 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 20:31 |
|
tholingale writes:
> Nightingale wrote:
>> tholingale wrote:
>>> At least I cross-posted to three different newsgroups, unlike you, who
>>> posted two different replies to my post.
>> Zero points for knowing how to read headers: Tholen only made one reply.
> Different headers does not necessarily mean different posters.
As you have demonstrated, tholingale.
> You should know that, Nightingale. Can you prove that Tholen made only
> one reply?
Can you prove that I made two prior to the time that you falsely accused
me of making two?
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979083 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 20:47 |
|
tholingale wrote:
> Nightingale wrote:
>
>> tholingale wrote:
>>> At least I cross-posted to three different newsgroups, unlike you, who
>>> posted two different replies to my post.
>>>
>> Zero points for knowing how to read headers: Tholen only made one reply.
>
> Different headers does not necessarily mean different posters. You should
> know that, Nightingale.
True, but headers can tell you a lot. For example, you and Hairgasm
post from the same IP - my guess is that you are the same person, but it
is also possible that there are two trolls sharing a computer.
> Can you prove that Tholen made only one reply?
Tholen does not post from readfreenews. The troll who posts from that
server has used a few different names, including mine and Tholen's.
--
Blessed Cecilia, appear in visions
To all musicians, appear and inspire:
Translated Daughter, come down and startle
Composing mortals with immortal fire.
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979090 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 21:32 |
|
Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:
> Dickless Davie tholen [at] antispam.ham the irrelevant Ignoranus whined and
> tholed:
> > tholingale <tholingale> writes:
> >
> > > Please stop posting to this newsgroup.
> >
> > You posted your request to three different newsgroups, therefore your
> > usage of "this" is both incorrect and ambiguous.
>
> "Clasic" "pontfication" on your part, Dickless.
Michael Baldwin, Bruce:
Thank you for your relentless efforts to stand up to Tholen the troll.
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979091 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 21:37 |
|
tholen [at] antispam.ham wrote:
> tholingale writes:
>
> > Nightingale wrote:
>
> >> tholingale wrote:
>
> >>> At least I cross-posted to three different newsgroups, unlike you, who
> >>> posted two different replies to my post.
>
> >> Zero points for knowing how to read headers: Tholen only made one reply.
>
> > Different headers does not necessarily mean different posters.
>
> As you have demonstrated, tholingale.
What have I allegedly demonstrated, Tholen?
> > You should know that, Nightingale. Can you prove that Tholen made only
> > one reply?
>
> Can you prove that I made two prior to the time that you falsely accused
> me of making two?
On what basis are you providing a non-answer for Nightingale, Tholen?
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979092 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 21:41 |
|
Manco wrote:
> tholingale wrote:
> > Please stop posting to this newsgroup.
> >
> > Thank you.
>
> Are you talkin' to me?
>
> ....
>
> Are you talkin' to me?
No, I am not.
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979093 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 21:42 |
|
tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
> tholingale <tholingale> writes:
>
> >>> Please stop posting to this newsgroup.
>
> >> You posted your request to three different newsgroups, therefore your
> >> usage of "this" is both incorrect and ambiguous.
>
> > At least I cross-posted to three different newsgroups,
>
> Glad to see you acknowledge your trolling behavior, tholingale.
You incorrectly presuppose that cross-posting equals trolling, Tholen.
>
> > unlike you,
>
> Glad to see you realize that I did not engage in any trolling
> behavior, tholingale.
Classic erroneous presupposition on your part, Tholen.
>
> > who posted two different replies to my post.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Prove that you did not post two different replies to my original post, Tholen.
>
> > And thank you for acknowledging that you are the Pavlovian Mutt by
> > responding to my thread.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition. Michael Baldwin Bruce, Manco, and
> dizzy also responded to your thread, which by your illogic, must
> mean that they are also the Pavlovian Mutt.
Incorrect; Manco is the only other person besides you to respond to my
original post, and as I have indicated, he is not the Pavlovian Mutt.
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979094 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 21:47 |
|
Nightingale wrote:
> tholingale wrote:
> > Nightingale wrote:
> >
> > > tholingale wrote:
> > > > At least I cross-posted to three different newsgroups, unlike you, who
> > > > posted two different replies to my post.
> > > >
> > > Zero points for knowing how to read headers: Tholen only made one
> > > reply.
> >
> > Different headers does not necessarily mean different posters. You should
> > know that, Nightingale.
>
> True, but headers can tell you a lot. For example, you and Hairgasm post
> from the same IP - my guess is that you are the same person, but it is also
> possible that there are two trolls sharing a computer.
It is also possible that there are multiple non-trolls sharing a computer.
It is also possible that the IP address is a router or a proxy, in which case
people don't even have to be sharing a computer.
> > Can you prove that Tholen made only one reply?
>
> Tholen does not post from readfreenews.
On what basis do you make that claim?
> The troll who posts from that server has used a few different names,
> including mine and Tholen's.
You erroneously presuppose that only one person can use readfreenews.
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979097 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 22:10 |
|
tholingale <tholingale> writes:
> tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
Also suffering from attribution problems, tholingale?
>>>>> Please stop posting to this newsgroup.
>>>> You posted your request to three different newsgroups, therefore your
>>>> usage of "this" is both incorrect and ambiguous.
>>> At least I cross-posted to three different newsgroups,
>> Glad to see you acknowledge your trolling behavior, tholingale.
> You incorrectly presuppose that cross-posting equals trolling, Tholen.
Not in your case, tholingale.
>>> unlike you,
>> Glad to see you realize that I did not engage in any trolling
>> behavior, tholingale.
> Classic erroneous presupposition on your part, Tholen.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>> who posted two different replies to my post.
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> Prove that you did not post two different replies to my original post,
> Tholen.
You're the one who claimed that I posted two different replies to
your post, tholingale, therefore the burden of proof falls on your
shoulders, not mine.
>>> And thank you for acknowledging that you are the Pavlovian Mutt by
>>> responding to my thread.
>> Classic erroneous presupposition. Michael Baldwin Bruce, Manco, and
>> dizzy also responded to your thread, which by your illogic, must
>> mean that they are also the Pavlovian Mutt.
> Incorrect; Manco is the only other person besides you to respond to my
> original post,
Non sequitur; you were talking about responses to your thread, tholingale,
not your original post. Having memory problems as well, tholingale?
> and as I have indicated, he is not the Pavlovian Mutt.
Classic inconsistency.
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979101 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 22:16 |
|
tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
> tholingale <tholingale> writes:
>
> > tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
>
> Also suffering from attribution problems, tholingale?
You did write the following, Tholen.
>
> >>>>> Please stop posting to this newsgroup.
>
> >>>> You posted your request to three different newsgroups, therefore your
> >>>> usage of "this" is both incorrect and ambiguous.
>
> >>> At least I cross-posted to three different newsgroups,
>
> >> Glad to see you acknowledge your trolling behavior, tholingale.
>
> > You incorrectly presuppose that cross-posting equals trolling, Tholen.
>
> Not in your case, tholingale.
I know that cross-posting does not equal trolling in my case, Tholen, but
that doesn't necessarily mean that anyone else who cross-posts is trolling.
>
> >>> unlike you,
>
> >> Glad to see you realize that I did not engage in any trolling
> >> behavior, tholingale.
>
> > Classic erroneous presupposition on your part, Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On the contrary.
>
> >>> who posted two different replies to my post.
>
> >> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> > Prove that you did not post two different replies to my original post,
> > Tholen.
>
> You're the one who claimed that I posted two different replies to
> your post, tholingale, therefore the burden of proof falls on your
> shoulders, not mine.
On the contrary, the burden of proof is on your shoulders to prove your claim
that you did not post two replies to my post.
> >>> And thank you for acknowledging that you are the Pavlovian Mutt by
> >>> responding to my thread.
>
> >> Classic erroneous presupposition. Michael Baldwin Bruce, Manco, and
> >> dizzy also responded to your thread, which by your illogic, must
> >> mean that they are also the Pavlovian Mutt.
>
> > Incorrect; Manco is the only other person besides you to respond to my
> > original post,
>
> Non sequitur; you were talking about responses to your thread, tholingale,
> not your original post. Having memory problems as well, tholingale?
Classic case of Tholen missing the point.
> > and as I have indicated, he is not the Pavlovian Mutt.
>
> Classic inconsistency.
Non sequitur.
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979107 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 22:26 |
|
tholingale <tholingale> writes:
>>> tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
>> Also suffering from attribution problems, tholingale?
> You did write the following, Tholen.
I see that you didn't answer the question, tholingale. No surprise
there, really.
>>>>>>> Please stop posting to this newsgroup.
>>>>>> You posted your request to three different newsgroups, therefore your
>>>>>> usage of "this" is both incorrect and ambiguous.
>>>>> At least I cross-posted to three different newsgroups,
>>>> Glad to see you acknowledge your trolling behavior, tholingale.
>>> You incorrectly presuppose that cross-posting equals trolling, Tholen.
>> Not in your case, tholingale.
> I know that cross-posting does not equal trolling in my case, Tholen,
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> but that doesn't necessarily mean that anyone else who cross-posts is
> trolling.
Irrelevant, given that I wasn't dealing with anyone else, tholingale;
rather, I was dealing with you.
>>>>> unlike you,
>>>> Glad to see you realize that I did not engage in any trolling
>>>> behavior, tholingale.
>>> Classic erroneous presupposition on your part, Tholen.
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> On the contrary.
The very definition of "unsubstantiated".
>>>>> who posted two different replies to my post.
>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>> Prove that you did not post two different replies to my original post,
>>> Tholen.
>> You're the one who claimed that I posted two different replies to
>> your post, tholingale, therefore the burden of proof falls on your
>> shoulders, not mine.
> On the contrary, the burden of proof is on your shoulders to prove your claim
> that you did not post two replies to my post.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>> And thank you for acknowledging that you are the Pavlovian Mutt by
>>>>> responding to my thread.
>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. Michael Baldwin Bruce, Manco, and
>>>> dizzy also responded to your thread, which by your illogic, must
>>>> mean that they are also the Pavlovian Mutt.
>>> Incorrect; Manco is the only other person besides you to respond to my
>>> original post,
>> Non sequitur; you were talking about responses to your thread, tholingale,
>> not your original post. Having memory problems as well, tholingale?
> Classic case of Tholen missing the point.
Classic erroneous presupposition
>>> and as I have indicated, he is not the Pavlovian Mutt.
>> Classic inconsistency.
> Non sequitur.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979112 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 22:31 |
|
tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
> tholingale <tholingale> writes:
>
> >>> tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
>
> >> Also suffering from attribution problems, tholingale?
>
> > You did write the following, Tholen.
>
> I see that you didn't answer the question, tholingale. No surprise
> there, really.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >>>>>>> Please stop posting to this newsgroup.
>
> >>>>>> You posted your request to three different newsgroups, therefore your
> >>>>>> usage of "this" is both incorrect and ambiguous.
>
> >>>>> At least I cross-posted to three different newsgroups,
>
> >>>> Glad to see you acknowledge your trolling behavior, tholingale.
>
> >>> You incorrectly presuppose that cross-posting equals trolling, Tholen.
>
> >> Not in your case, tholingale.
>
> > I know that cross-posting does not equal trolling in my case, Tholen,
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Stop lying, Tholen.
>
> > but that doesn't necessarily mean that anyone else who cross-posts is
> > trolling.
>
> Irrelevant, given that I wasn't dealing with anyone else, tholingale;
> rather, I was dealing with you.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >>>>> unlike you,
>
> >>>> Glad to see you realize that I did not engage in any trolling
> >>>> behavior, tholingale.
>
> >>> Classic erroneous presupposition on your part, Tholen.
>
> >> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> > On the contrary.
>
> The very definition of "unsubstantiated".
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >>>>> who posted two different replies to my post.
>
> >>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >>> Prove that you did not post two different replies to my original post,
> >>> Tholen.
>
> >> You're the one who claimed that I posted two different replies to
> >> your post, tholingale, therefore the burden of proof falls on your
> >> shoulders, not mine.
>
> > On the contrary, the burden of proof is on your shoulders to prove your
> > claim that you did not post two replies to my post.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Stop lying, Tholen.
>
> >>>>> And thank you for acknowledging that you are the Pavlovian Mutt by
> >>>>> responding to my thread.
>
> >>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. Michael Baldwin Bruce, Manco, and
> >>>> dizzy also responded to your thread, which by your illogic, must
> >>>> mean that they are also the Pavlovian Mutt.
>
> >>> Incorrect; Manco is the only other person besides you to respond to my
> >>> original post,
>
> >> Non sequitur; you were talking about responses to your thread,
> tholingale, >> not your original post. Having memory problems as well,
> tholingale?
>
> > Classic case of Tholen missing the point.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >>> and as I have indicated, he is not the Pavlovian Mutt.
>
> >> Classic inconsistency.
>
> > Non sequitur.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Stop lying, Tholen.
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979115 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 22:33 |
|
tholingale <tholingale> writes:
>>>>> tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
>>>> Also suffering from attribution problems, tholingale?
>>> You did write the following, Tholen.
>> I see that you didn't answer the question, tholingale. No surprise
>> there, really.
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part, tholingale.
>>>>>>>>> Please stop posting to this newsgroup.
>>>>>>>> You posted your request to three different newsgroups, therefore your
>>>>>>>> usage of "this" is both incorrect and ambiguous.
>>>>>>> At least I cross-posted to three different newsgroups,
>>>>>> Glad to see you acknowledge your trolling behavior, tholingale.
>>>>> You incorrectly presuppose that cross-posting equals trolling, Tholen.
>>>> Not in your case, tholingale.
>>> I know that cross-posting does not equal trolling in my case, Tholen,
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> Stop lying, Tholen.
Classic erroneous presupposition of lying.
>>> but that doesn't necessarily mean that anyone else who cross-posts is
>>> trolling.
>> Irrelevant, given that I wasn't dealing with anyone else, tholingale;
>> rather, I was dealing with you.
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part, tholingale.
>>>>>>> unlike you,
>>>>>> Glad to see you realize that I did not engage in any trolling
>>>>>> behavior, tholingale.
>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition on your part, Tholen.
>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>> On the contrary.
>> The very definition of "unsubstantiated".
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part, tholingale.
>>>>>>> who posted two different replies to my post.
>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>> Prove that you did not post two different replies to my original post,
>>>>> Tholen.
>>>> You're the one who claimed that I posted two different replies to
>>>> your post, tholingale, therefore the burden of proof falls on your
>>>> shoulders, not mine.
>>> On the contrary, the burden of proof is on your shoulders to prove your
>>> claim that you did not post two replies to my post.
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> Stop lying, Tholen.
Classic erroneous presupposition of lying.
>>>>>>> And thank you for acknowledging that you are the Pavlovian Mutt by
>>>>>>> responding to my thread.
>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. Michael Baldwin Bruce, Manco, and
>>>>>> dizzy also responded to your thread, which by your illogic, must
>>>>>> mean that they are also the Pavlovian Mutt.
>>>>> Incorrect; Manco is the only other person besides you to respond to my
>>>>> original post,
>>>> Non sequitur; you were talking about responses to your thread,
>>>> tholingale, not your original post. Having memory problems as well,
>>>> tholingale?
>>> Classic case of Tholen missing the point.
>> Classic erroneous presupposition
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
On your part, tholingale.
>>>>> and as I have indicated, he is not the Pavlovian Mutt.
>>>> Classic inconsistency.
>>> Non sequitur.
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> Stop lying, Tholen.
Classic erroneous presupposition of lying.
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979118 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 22:43 |
|
tholingale writes:
>>> Nightingale wrote:
>>>> tholingale wrote:
>>>>> At least I cross-posted to three different newsgroups, unlike you, who
>>>>> posted two different replies to my post.
>>>> Zero points for knowing how to read headers: Tholen only made one reply.
>>> Different headers does not necessarily mean different posters.
>> As you have demonstrated, tholingale.
> What have I allegedly demonstrated, Tholen?
Suffering from reading comprehension problems, tholingale?
>>> You should know that, Nightingale. Can you prove that Tholen made only
>>> one reply?
>> Can you prove that I made two prior to the time that you falsely accused
>> me of making two?
> On what basis are you providing a non-answer for Nightingale, Tholen?
I see that you didn't answer the question, tholingale. No surprise
there, really.
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979122 ] |
Wed, 26 April 2006 01:26 |
|
Fartingale AKA Nightingale wrote:
> tholingale wrote:
> >
> > At least I cross-posted to three different newsgroups, unlike you, who
> > posted two different replies to my post.
> >
>
> Zero points for knowing how to read headers: Tholen only made one reply.
On what basis do you make that k'lame, Fartingale?
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979123 ] |
Wed, 26 April 2006 01:28 |
|
tholingale wrote:
> Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote:
>
> > Dickless Davie tholen [at] antispam.ham the irrelevant Ignoranus whined and
> > tholed:
> > > tholingale <tholingale> writes:
> > >
> > > > Please stop posting to this newsgroup.
> > >
> > > You posted your request to three different newsgroups, therefore your
> > > usage of "this" is both incorrect and ambiguous.
> >
> > "Clasic" "pontfication" on your part, Dickless.
>
> Michael Baldwin, Bruce:
>
> Thank you for your relentless efforts to stand up to Tholen the troll.
Yes, I'm well known for standing up to these kooky trolls. I usually
tell them to sit down and shut up. But, do they listen?
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979126 ] |
Wed, 26 April 2006 02:10 |
|
This might help her -
http://www.physics.ohio-state.edu/~sstoneb/agony/fantasies/
"Unfortunately, you can't spend every waking moment with your Adored One.
That's where fantasies and daydreams come in. There is simply no better way
to agonize over what you want but will never have. In this section you'll
find a list of prototypical daydreams as well as some specific examples to
get you started."
"Michael Baldwin, Bruce" <mbbr [at] mighty.co.za> wrote in message
news:1146007593.411343.71400 [at] e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
> Fartingale AKA Nightingale wrote:
> > tholingale wrote:
> > >
> > > At least I cross-posted to three different newsgroups, unlike you, who
> > > posted two different replies to my post.
> > >
> >
> > Zero points for knowing how to read headers: Tholen only made one
reply.
>
> On what basis do you make that k'lame, Fartingale?
>
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979135 ] |
Wed, 26 April 2006 08:54 |
|
tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
> tholingale <tholingale> writes:
>
> >>>>> tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
>
> >>>> Also suffering from attribution problems, tholingale?
>
> >>> You did write the following, Tholen.
>
> >> I see that you didn't answer the question, tholingale. No surprise
> >> there, really.
>
> > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> On your part, tholingale.
Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
>
> >>>>>>>>> Please stop posting to this newsgroup.
>
> >>>>>>>> You posted your request to three different newsgroups, therefore
> your >>>>>>>> usage of "this" is both incorrect and ambiguous.
>
> >>>>>>> At least I cross-posted to three different newsgroups,
>
> >>>>>> Glad to see you acknowledge your trolling behavior, tholingale.
>
> >>>>> You incorrectly presuppose that cross-posting equals trolling, Tholen.
>
> >>>> Not in your case, tholingale.
>
> >>> I know that cross-posting does not equal trolling in my case, Tholen,
>
> >> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> > Stop lying, Tholen.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition of lying.
Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
>
> >>> but that doesn't necessarily mean that anyone else who cross-posts is
> >>> trolling.
>
> >> Irrelevant, given that I wasn't dealing with anyone else, tholingale;
> >> rather, I was dealing with you.
>
> > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> On your part, tholingale.
Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
>
> >>>>>>> unlike you,
>
> >>>>>> Glad to see you realize that I did not engage in any trolling
> >>>>>> behavior, tholingale.
>
> >>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition on your part, Tholen.
>
> >>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >>> On the contrary.
>
> >> The very definition of "unsubstantiated".
>
> > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> On your part, tholingale.
Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
>
> >>>>>>> who posted two different replies to my post.
>
> >>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >>>>> Prove that you did not post two different replies to my original post,
> >>>>> Tholen.
>
> >>>> You're the one who claimed that I posted two different replies to
> >>>> your post, tholingale, therefore the burden of proof falls on your
> >>>> shoulders, not mine.
>
> >>> On the contrary, the burden of proof is on your shoulders to prove your
> >>> claim that you did not post two replies to my post.
>
> >> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> > Stop lying, Tholen.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition of lying.
Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
>
> >>>>>>> And thank you for acknowledging that you are the Pavlovian Mutt by
> >>>>>>> responding to my thread.
>
> >>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. Michael Baldwin Bruce, Manco, and
> >>>>>> dizzy also responded to your thread, which by your illogic, must
> >>>>>> mean that they are also the Pavlovian Mutt.
>
> >>>>> Incorrect; Manco is the only other person besides you to respond to my
> >>>>> original post,
>
> >>>> Non sequitur; you were talking about responses to your thread,
> >>>> tholingale, not your original post. Having memory problems as well,
> >>>> tholingale?
>
> >>> Classic case of Tholen missing the point.
>
> >> Classic erroneous presupposition
>
> > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> On your part, tholingale.
Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
>
> >>>>> and as I have indicated, he is not the Pavlovian Mutt.
>
> >>>> Classic inconsistency.
>
> >>> Non sequitur.
>
> >> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> > Stop lying, Tholen.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition of lying.
Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979136 ] |
Wed, 26 April 2006 08:58 |
|
tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
> tholingale writes:
>
> >>> Nightingale wrote:
>
> >>>> tholingale wrote:
>
> >>>>> At least I cross-posted to three different newsgroups, unlike you, who
> >>>>> posted two different replies to my post.
>
> >>>> Zero points for knowing how to read headers: Tholen only made one
> reply.
>
> >>> Different headers does not necessarily mean different posters.
>
> >> As you have demonstrated, tholingale.
>
> > What have I allegedly demonstrated, Tholen?
>
> Suffering from reading comprehension problems, tholingale?
No, but you are continuing to, Tholen. See a medical doctor and a
psychiatrist, immediately, Tholen.
>
> >>> You should know that, Nightingale. Can you prove that Tholen made only
> >>> one reply?
>
> >> Can you prove that I made two prior to the time that you falsely accused
> >> me of making two?
>
> > On what basis are you providing a non-answer for Nightingale, Tholen?
>
> I see that you didn't answer the question, tholingale. No surprise
> there, really.
Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979142 ] |
Wed, 26 April 2006 13:59 |
|
tholingale writes:
> tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
Still suffering from attribution problems, tholingale?
>>>>>>> tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
>>>>>> Also suffering from attribution problems, tholingale?
>>>>> You did write the following, Tholen.
>>>> I see that you didn't answer the question, tholingale. No surprise
>>>> there, really.
>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>> On your part, tholingale.
> Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>>>>>>> Please stop posting to this newsgroup.
>>>>>>>>>> You posted your request to three different newsgroups, therefore
>>>>>>>>>> your usage of "this" is both incorrect and ambiguous.
>>>>>>>>> At least I cross-posted to three different newsgroups,
>>>>>>>> Glad to see you acknowledge your trolling behavior, tholingale.
>>>>>>> You incorrectly presuppose that cross-posting equals trolling, Tholen.
>>>>>> Not in your case, tholingale.
>>>>> I know that cross-posting does not equal trolling in my case, Tholen,
>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>> Stop lying, Tholen.
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of lying.
> Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>> but that doesn't necessarily mean that anyone else who cross-posts is
>>>>> trolling.
>>>> Irrelevant, given that I wasn't dealing with anyone else, tholingale;
>>>> rather, I was dealing with you.
>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>> On your part, tholingale.
> Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>>>>> unlike you,
>>>>>>>> Glad to see you realize that I did not engage in any trolling
>>>>>>>> behavior, tholingale.
>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition on your part, Tholen.
>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>> On the contrary.
>>>> The very definition of "unsubstantiated".
>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>> On your part, tholingale.
> Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>>>>> who posted two different replies to my post.
>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>>> Prove that you did not post two different replies to my original post,
>>>>>>> Tholen.
>>>>>> You're the one who claimed that I posted two different replies to
>>>>>> your post, tholingale, therefore the burden of proof falls on your
>>>>>> shoulders, not mine.
>>>>> On the contrary, the burden of proof is on your shoulders to prove your
>>>>> claim that you did not post two replies to my post.
>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>> Stop lying, Tholen.
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of lying.
> Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>>>>> And thank you for acknowledging that you are the Pavlovian Mutt by
>>>>>>>>> responding to my thread.
>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. Michael Baldwin Bruce, Manco, and
>>>>>>>> dizzy also responded to your thread, which by your illogic, must
>>>>>>>> mean that they are also the Pavlovian Mutt.
>>>>>>> Incorrect; Manco is the only other person besides you to respond to my
>>>>>>> original post,
>>>>>> Non sequitur; you were talking about responses to your thread,
>>>>>> tholingale, not your original post. Having memory problems as well,
>>>>>> tholingale?
>>>>> Classic case of Tholen missing the point.
>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition
>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>> On your part, tholingale.
> Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>>> and as I have indicated, he is not the Pavlovian Mutt.
>>>>>> Classic inconsistency.
>>>>> Non sequitur.
>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>> Stop lying, Tholen.
>> Classic erroneous presupposition of lying.
> Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979145 ] |
Wed, 26 April 2006 14:08 |
|
tholingale writes:
> tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
Still suffering from attribution problems, tholingale?
>>>>> Nightingale wrote:
>>>>>> tholingale wrote:
>>>>>>> At least I cross-posted to three different newsgroups, unlike you, who
>>>>>>> posted two different replies to my post.
>>>>>> Zero points for knowing how to read headers: Tholen only made one reply.
>>>>> Different headers does not necessarily mean different posters.
>>>> As you have demonstrated, tholingale.
>>> What have I allegedly demonstrated, Tholen?
>> Suffering from reading comprehension problems, tholingale?
> No,
Then why weren't you able to comprehend how your different headers
("tholingale" and "Hairgasm") do not necessarily mean different
posters (both originating from NNTP posting host 69.140.51.205)?
> but you are continuing to, Tholen.
Classic erroneous presupposition.
> See a medical doctor and a psychiatrist, immediately, Tholen.
Practice what you preach, tholingale. Or should I say Hairgasm?
>>>>> You should know that, Nightingale. Can you prove that Tholen made only
>>>>> one reply?
>>>> Can you prove that I made two prior to the time that you falsely accused
>>>> me of making two?
>>> On what basis are you providing a non-answer for Nightingale, Tholen?
>> I see that you didn't answer the question, tholingale. No surprise
>> there, really.
> Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979182 ] |
Thu, 27 April 2006 04:15 |
|
tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
> tholingale writes:
>
> > tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
>
> Still suffering from attribution problems, tholingale?
What does your question have to do with college basketball or college
football, Tholen?
>
> >>>>> Nightingale wrote:
>
> >>>>>> tholingale wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> At least I cross-posted to three different newsgroups, unlike you,
> who >>>>>>> posted two different replies to my post.
>
> >>>>>> Zero points for knowing how to read headers: Tholen only made one
> reply.
>
> >>>>> Different headers does not necessarily mean different posters.
>
> >>>> As you have demonstrated, tholingale.
>
> >>> What have I allegedly demonstrated, Tholen?
>
> >> Suffering from reading comprehension problems, tholingale?
>
> > No,
>
> Then why weren't you able to comprehend how your different headers
> ("tholingale" and "Hairgasm") do not necessarily mean different
> posters (both originating from NNTP posting host 69.140.51.205)?
On what basis do you claim that "tholingale" is a header and "Hairgasm" is a
header?
>
> > but you are continuing to, Tholen.
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
>
> > See a medical doctor and a psychiatrist, immediately, Tholen.
>
> Practice what you preach, tholingale.
Classic erroneous presupposition that I am preaching.
>Or should I say Hairgasm?
You may say Hairgasm, if you want to suffer from attribution problems.
>
> >>>>> You should know that, Nightingale. Can you prove that Tholen made
> only >>>>> one reply?
>
> >>>> Can you prove that I made two prior to the time that you falsely
> accused >>>> me of making two?
>
> >>> On what basis are you providing a non-answer for Nightingale, Tholen?
>
> >> I see that you didn't answer the question, tholingale. No surprise
> >> there, really.
>
> > Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
I see that you agree that you made a classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
claim. Good.
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979183 ] |
Thu, 27 April 2006 04:17 |
|
tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
> tholingale writes:
>
> > tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
>
> Still suffering from attribution problems, tholingale?
What does your question have to do with college basketball or college
football, Tholen?
>
> >>>>>>> tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
>
> >>>>>> Also suffering from attribution problems, tholingale?
>
> >>>>> You did write the following, Tholen.
>
> >>>> I see that you didn't answer the question, tholingale. No surprise
> >>>> there, really.
>
> >>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >> On your part, tholingale.
>
> > Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
I see that you agree that you made a classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
claim. Good.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Please stop posting to this newsgroup.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> You posted your request to three different newsgroups, therefore
> >>>>>>>>>> your usage of "this" is both incorrect and ambiguous.
>
> >>>>>>>>> At least I cross-posted to three different newsgroups,
>
> >>>>>>>> Glad to see you acknowledge your trolling behavior, tholingale.
>
> >>>>>>> You incorrectly presuppose that cross-posting equals trolling,
> Tholen.
>
> >>>>>> Not in your case, tholingale.
>
> >>>>> I know that cross-posting does not equal trolling in my case, Tholen,
>
> >>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >>> Stop lying, Tholen.
>
> >> Classic erroneous presupposition of lying.
>
> > Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
I see that you agree that you made a classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
claim. Good.
>
> >>>>> but that doesn't necessarily mean that anyone else who cross-posts is
> >>>>> trolling.
>
> >>>> Irrelevant, given that I wasn't dealing with anyone else, tholingale;
> >>>> rather, I was dealing with you.
>
> >>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >> On your part, tholingale.
>
> > Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
I see that you agree that you made a classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
claim. Good.
>
> >>>>>>>>> unlike you,
>
> >>>>>>>> Glad to see you realize that I did not engage in any trolling
> >>>>>>>> behavior, tholingale.
>
> >>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition on your part, Tholen.
>
> >>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >>>>> On the contrary.
>
> >>>> The very definition of "unsubstantiated".
>
> >>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >> On your part, tholingale.
>
> > Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
I see that you agree that you made a classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
claim. Good.
>
> >>>>>>>>> who posted two different replies to my post.
>
> >>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >>>>>>> Prove that you did not post two different replies to my original
> post, >>>>>>> Tholen.
>
> >>>>>> You're the one who claimed that I posted two different replies to
> >>>>>> your post, tholingale, therefore the burden of proof falls on your
> >>>>>> shoulders, not mine.
>
> >>>>> On the contrary, the burden of proof is on your shoulders to prove
> your >>>>> claim that you did not post two replies to my post.
>
> >>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >>> Stop lying, Tholen.
>
> >> Classic erroneous presupposition of lying.
>
> > Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
I see that you agree that you made a classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
claim. Good.
>
> >>>>>>>>> And thank you for acknowledging that you are the Pavlovian Mutt
> by >>>>>>>>> responding to my thread.
>
> >>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. Michael Baldwin Bruce, Manco,
> and >>>>>>>> dizzy also responded to your thread, which by your illogic,
> must >>>>>>>> mean that they are also the Pavlovian Mutt.
>
> >>>>>>> Incorrect; Manco is the only other person besides you to respond to
> my >>>>>>> original post,
>
> >>>>>> Non sequitur; you were talking about responses to your thread,
> >>>>>> tholingale, not your original post. Having memory problems as well,
> >>>>>> tholingale?
>
> >>>>> Classic case of Tholen missing the point.
>
> >>>> Classic erroneous presupposition
>
> >>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >> On your part, tholingale.
>
> > Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
I see that you agree that you made a classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
claim. Good.
>
> >>>>>>> and as I have indicated, he is not the Pavlovian Mutt.
>
> >>>>>> Classic inconsistency.
>
> >>>>> Non sequitur.
>
> >>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >>> Stop lying, Tholen.
>
> >> Classic erroneous presupposition of lying.
>
> > Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
I see that you agree that you made a classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
claim. Good.
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979188 ] |
Thu, 27 April 2006 04:26 |
|
tholingale wrote:
> tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
>>tholingale writes:
>>>tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
>>Still suffering from attribution problems, tholingale?
> What does your question have to do with college basketball or college
> football, Tholen?
What does your question have to do with classical music, tholingale?
--
Io la Musica son, ch'ai dolci accenti
So far tranquillo ogni turbato core,
Et or di nobil ira et or d'amore
Poss'infiammar le pił gelate menti.
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979194 ] |
Thu, 27 April 2006 05:13 |
|
<tholen [at] antispam.ham> wrote in message
news:tgJ3g.1646$Nk3.1397 [at] tornado.socal.rr.com...
> tholingale writes:
>
> > tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
>
> Still suffering from attribution problems, tholingale?
>
He knows you too well, Tholen.
> >>>>>>> tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
>
> >>>>>> Also suffering from attribution problems, tholingale?
>
> >>>>> You did write the following, Tholen.
>
> >>>> I see that you didn't answer the question, tholingale. No surprise
> >>>> there, really.
>
> >>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >> On your part, tholingale.
>
> > Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Please stop posting to this newsgroup.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> You posted your request to three different newsgroups,
therefore
> >>>>>>>>>> your usage of "this" is both incorrect and ambiguous.
>
> >>>>>>>>> At least I cross-posted to three different newsgroups,
>
> >>>>>>>> Glad to see you acknowledge your trolling behavior, tholingale.
>
> >>>>>>> You incorrectly presuppose that cross-posting equals trolling,
Tholen.
>
> >>>>>> Not in your case, tholingale.
>
> >>>>> I know that cross-posting does not equal trolling in my case,
Tholen,
>
> >>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >>> Stop lying, Tholen.
>
> >> Classic erroneous presupposition of lying.
>
> > Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >>>>> but that doesn't necessarily mean that anyone else who cross-posts
is
> >>>>> trolling.
>
> >>>> Irrelevant, given that I wasn't dealing with anyone else, tholingale;
> >>>> rather, I was dealing with you.
>
> >>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >> On your part, tholingale.
>
> > Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >>>>>>>>> unlike you,
>
> >>>>>>>> Glad to see you realize that I did not engage in any trolling
> >>>>>>>> behavior, tholingale.
>
> >>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition on your part, Tholen.
>
> >>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >>>>> On the contrary.
>
> >>>> The very definition of "unsubstantiated".
>
> >>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >> On your part, tholingale.
>
> > Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >>>>>>>>> who posted two different replies to my post.
>
> >>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >>>>>>> Prove that you did not post two different replies to my original
post,
> >>>>>>> Tholen.
>
> >>>>>> You're the one who claimed that I posted two different replies to
> >>>>>> your post, tholingale, therefore the burden of proof falls on your
> >>>>>> shoulders, not mine.
>
> >>>>> On the contrary, the burden of proof is on your shoulders to prove
your
> >>>>> claim that you did not post two replies to my post.
>
> >>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >>> Stop lying, Tholen.
>
> >> Classic erroneous presupposition of lying.
>
> > Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >>>>>>>>> And thank you for acknowledging that you are the Pavlovian Mutt
by
> >>>>>>>>> responding to my thread.
>
> >>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. Michael Baldwin Bruce, Manco,
and
> >>>>>>>> dizzy also responded to your thread, which by your illogic, must
> >>>>>>>> mean that they are also the Pavlovian Mutt.
>
> >>>>>>> Incorrect; Manco is the only other person besides you to respond
to my
> >>>>>>> original post,
>
> >>>>>> Non sequitur; you were talking about responses to your thread,
> >>>>>> tholingale, not your original post. Having memory problems as
well,
> >>>>>> tholingale?
>
> >>>>> Classic case of Tholen missing the point.
>
> >>>> Classic erroneous presupposition
>
> >>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >> On your part, tholingale.
>
> > Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >>>>>>> and as I have indicated, he is not the Pavlovian Mutt.
>
> >>>>>> Classic inconsistency.
>
> >>>>> Non sequitur.
>
> >>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> >>> Stop lying, Tholen.
>
> >> Classic erroneous presupposition of lying.
>
> > Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979195 ] |
Thu, 27 April 2006 05:15 |
|
<tholingale> wrote in message
news:xn0elg6md14t1c0001 [at] newsgroups.comcast.net...
> tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
>
> > tholingale writes:
> >
> > > tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
> >
> > Still suffering from attribution problems, tholingale?
>
> What does your question have to do with college basketball or college
> football, Tholen?
>
About as much as it has to do with classical music.
I've been thinking about this subject header - it's not right to call him a
Pavlovian Mutt. It's really unfair to the Mutt.
> >
> > >>>>>>> tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
> >
> > >>>>>> Also suffering from attribution problems, tholingale?
> >
> > >>>>> You did write the following, Tholen.
> >
> > >>>> I see that you didn't answer the question, tholingale. No surprise
> > >>>> there, really.
> >
> > >>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> >
> > >> On your part, tholingale.
> >
> > > Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
> >
> > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> I see that you agree that you made a classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
> claim. Good.
>
> >
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Please stop posting to this newsgroup.
> >
> > >>>>>>>>>> You posted your request to three different newsgroups,
therefore
> > >>>>>>>>>> your usage of "this" is both incorrect and ambiguous.
> >
> > >>>>>>>>> At least I cross-posted to three different newsgroups,
> >
> > >>>>>>>> Glad to see you acknowledge your trolling behavior, tholingale.
> >
> > >>>>>>> You incorrectly presuppose that cross-posting equals trolling,
> > Tholen.
> >
> > >>>>>> Not in your case, tholingale.
> >
> > >>>>> I know that cross-posting does not equal trolling in my case,
Tholen,
> >
> > >>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> >
> > >>> Stop lying, Tholen.
> >
> > >> Classic erroneous presupposition of lying.
> >
> > > Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
> >
> > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> I see that you agree that you made a classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
> claim. Good.
>
> >
> > >>>>> but that doesn't necessarily mean that anyone else who cross-posts
is
> > >>>>> trolling.
> >
> > >>>> Irrelevant, given that I wasn't dealing with anyone else,
tholingale;
> > >>>> rather, I was dealing with you.
> >
> > >>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> >
> > >> On your part, tholingale.
> >
> > > Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
> >
> > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> I see that you agree that you made a classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
> claim. Good.
>
> >
> > >>>>>>>>> unlike you,
> >
> > >>>>>>>> Glad to see you realize that I did not engage in any trolling
> > >>>>>>>> behavior, tholingale.
> >
> > >>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition on your part, Tholen.
> >
> > >>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> >
> > >>>>> On the contrary.
> >
> > >>>> The very definition of "unsubstantiated".
> >
> > >>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> >
> > >> On your part, tholingale.
> >
> > > Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
> >
> > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> I see that you agree that you made a classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
> claim. Good.
>
> >
> > >>>>>>>>> who posted two different replies to my post.
> >
> > >>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> >
> > >>>>>>> Prove that you did not post two different replies to my original
> > post, >>>>>>> Tholen.
> >
> > >>>>>> You're the one who claimed that I posted two different replies to
> > >>>>>> your post, tholingale, therefore the burden of proof falls on
your
> > >>>>>> shoulders, not mine.
> >
> > >>>>> On the contrary, the burden of proof is on your shoulders to prove
> > your >>>>> claim that you did not post two replies to my post.
> >
> > >>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> >
> > >>> Stop lying, Tholen.
> >
> > >> Classic erroneous presupposition of lying.
> >
> > > Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
> >
> > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> I see that you agree that you made a classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
> claim. Good.
>
> >
> > >>>>>>>>> And thank you for acknowledging that you are the Pavlovian
Mutt
> > by >>>>>>>>> responding to my thread.
> >
> > >>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. Michael Baldwin Bruce,
Manco,
> > and >>>>>>>> dizzy also responded to your thread, which by your illogic,
> > must >>>>>>>> mean that they are also the Pavlovian Mutt.
> >
> > >>>>>>> Incorrect; Manco is the only other person besides you to respond
to
> > my >>>>>>> original post,
> >
> > >>>>>> Non sequitur; you were talking about responses to your thread,
> > >>>>>> tholingale, not your original post. Having memory problems as
well,
> > >>>>>> tholingale?
> >
> > >>>>> Classic case of Tholen missing the point.
> >
> > >>>> Classic erroneous presupposition
> >
> > >>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> >
> > >> On your part, tholingale.
> >
> > > Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
> >
> > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> I see that you agree that you made a classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
> claim. Good.
>
> >
> > >>>>>>> and as I have indicated, he is not the Pavlovian Mutt.
> >
> > >>>>>> Classic inconsistency.
> >
> > >>>>> Non sequitur.
> >
> > >>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> >
> > >>> Stop lying, Tholen.
> >
> > >> Classic erroneous presupposition of lying.
> >
> > > Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
> >
> > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>
> I see that you agree that you made a classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
> claim. Good.
>
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979196 ] |
Thu, 27 April 2006 05:18 |
|
Nightingale wrote:
>
> tholingale wrote:
> > tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
> > > tholingale writes:
> > > > tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
> > > Still suffering from attribution problems, tholingale?
> > What does your question have to do with college basketball or college
> > football, Tholen?
>
> What does your question have to do with classical music, tholingale?
On what basis do you provide a non-answer for Tholen, Nightingale?
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979199 ] |
Thu, 27 April 2006 05:30 |
|
Nightingale loves Tholen wrote:
> This might help her -
> http://www.physics.ohio-state.edu/~sstoneb/agony/fantasies/
>
> "Unfortunately, you can't spend every waking moment with your Adored One.
> That's where fantasies and daydreams come in. There is simply no better way
> to agonize over what you want but will never have. In this section you'll
> find a list of prototypical daydreams as well as some specific examples to
> get you started."
I think she does plenty of that already.
> "Michael Baldwin, Bruce" <mbbr [at] mighty.co.za> wrote in message
> news:1146007593.411343.71400 [at] e56g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
> > Fartingale AKA Nightingale wrote:
> > > tholingale wrote:
> > > >
> > > > At least I cross-posted to three different newsgroups, unlike you, who
> > > > posted two different replies to my post.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Zero points for knowing how to read headers: Tholen only made one
> reply.
> >
> > On what basis do you make that k'lame, Fartingale?
> >
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979200 ] |
Thu, 27 April 2006 05:32 |
|
Nightingale loves Tholen wrote:
> <tholingale> wrote in message
> news:xn0elg6md14t1c0001 [at] newsgroups.comcast.net...
> > tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
> >
> > > tholingale writes:
> > >
> > > > tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
> > >
> > > Still suffering from attribution problems, tholingale?
> >
> > What does your question have to do with college basketball or college
> > football, Tholen?
> >
>
> About as much as it has to do with classical music.
>
> I've been thinking about this subject header - it's not right to call him a
> Pavlovian Mutt. It's really unfair to the Mutt.
Pavlov might like it though.
> > > >>>>>>> tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
> > >
> > > >>>>>> Also suffering from attribution problems, tholingale?
> > >
> > > >>>>> You did write the following, Tholen.
> > >
> > > >>>> I see that you didn't answer the question, tholingale. No surprise
> > > >>>> there, really.
> > >
> > > >>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> > >
> > > >> On your part, tholingale.
> > >
> > > > Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
> > >
> > > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> >
> > I see that you agree that you made a classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
> > claim. Good.
> >
> > >
> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Please stop posting to this newsgroup.
> > >
> > > >>>>>>>>>> You posted your request to three different newsgroups,
> therefore
> > > >>>>>>>>>> your usage of "this" is both incorrect and ambiguous.
> > >
> > > >>>>>>>>> At least I cross-posted to three different newsgroups,
> > >
> > > >>>>>>>> Glad to see you acknowledge your trolling behavior, tholingale.
> > >
> > > >>>>>>> You incorrectly presuppose that cross-posting equals trolling,
> > > Tholen.
> > >
> > > >>>>>> Not in your case, tholingale.
> > >
> > > >>>>> I know that cross-posting does not equal trolling in my case,
> Tholen,
> > >
> > > >>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> > >
> > > >>> Stop lying, Tholen.
> > >
> > > >> Classic erroneous presupposition of lying.
> > >
> > > > Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
> > >
> > > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> >
> > I see that you agree that you made a classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
> > claim. Good.
> >
> > >
> > > >>>>> but that doesn't necessarily mean that anyone else who cross-posts
> is
> > > >>>>> trolling.
> > >
> > > >>>> Irrelevant, given that I wasn't dealing with anyone else,
> tholingale;
> > > >>>> rather, I was dealing with you.
> > >
> > > >>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> > >
> > > >> On your part, tholingale.
> > >
> > > > Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
> > >
> > > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> >
> > I see that you agree that you made a classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
> > claim. Good.
> >
> > >
> > > >>>>>>>>> unlike you,
> > >
> > > >>>>>>>> Glad to see you realize that I did not engage in any trolling
> > > >>>>>>>> behavior, tholingale.
> > >
> > > >>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition on your part, Tholen.
> > >
> > > >>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> > >
> > > >>>>> On the contrary.
> > >
> > > >>>> The very definition of "unsubstantiated".
> > >
> > > >>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> > >
> > > >> On your part, tholingale.
> > >
> > > > Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
> > >
> > > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> >
> > I see that you agree that you made a classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
> > claim. Good.
> >
> > >
> > > >>>>>>>>> who posted two different replies to my post.
> > >
> > > >>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> > >
> > > >>>>>>> Prove that you did not post two different replies to my original
> > > post, >>>>>>> Tholen.
> > >
> > > >>>>>> You're the one who claimed that I posted two different replies to
> > > >>>>>> your post, tholingale, therefore the burden of proof falls on
> your
> > > >>>>>> shoulders, not mine.
> > >
> > > >>>>> On the contrary, the burden of proof is on your shoulders to prove
> > > your >>>>> claim that you did not post two replies to my post.
> > >
> > > >>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> > >
> > > >>> Stop lying, Tholen.
> > >
> > > >> Classic erroneous presupposition of lying.
> > >
> > > > Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
> > >
> > > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> >
> > I see that you agree that you made a classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
> > claim. Good.
> >
> > >
> > > >>>>>>>>> And thank you for acknowledging that you are the Pavlovian
> Mutt
> > > by >>>>>>>>> responding to my thread.
> > >
> > > >>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. Michael Baldwin Bruce,
> Manco,
> > > and >>>>>>>> dizzy also responded to your thread, which by your illogic,
> > > must >>>>>>>> mean that they are also the Pavlovian Mutt.
> > >
> > > >>>>>>> Incorrect; Manco is the only other person besides you to respond
> to
> > > my >>>>>>> original post,
> > >
> > > >>>>>> Non sequitur; you were talking about responses to your thread,
> > > >>>>>> tholingale, not your original post. Having memory problems as
> well,
> > > >>>>>> tholingale?
> > >
> > > >>>>> Classic case of Tholen missing the point.
> > >
> > > >>>> Classic erroneous presupposition
> > >
> > > >>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> > >
> > > >> On your part, tholingale.
> > >
> > > > Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
> > >
> > > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> >
> > I see that you agree that you made a classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
> > claim. Good.
> >
> > >
> > > >>>>>>> and as I have indicated, he is not the Pavlovian Mutt.
> > >
> > > >>>>>> Classic inconsistency.
> > >
> > > >>>>> Non sequitur.
> > >
> > > >>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> > >
> > > >>> Stop lying, Tholen.
> > >
> > > >> Classic erroneous presupposition of lying.
> > >
> > > > Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
> > >
> > > Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> >
> > I see that you agree that you made a classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
> > claim. Good.
|
|
|
| Re: To the Pavlovian Mutt [message #979229 ] |
Thu, 27 April 2006 20:17 |
|
tholingale writes:
> tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
Still suffering from attribution problems, tholingale?
>>> tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
>> Still suffering from attribution problems, tholingale?
> What does your question have to do with college basketball or college
> football, Tholen?
You should know, tholingale, given that you started this thread in
those two newsgroups, as well as rec.music.classical.
>>>>>>>>> tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
>>>>>>>> Also suffering from attribution problems, tholingale?
>>>>>>> You did write the following, Tholen.
>>>>>> I see that you didn't answer the question, tholingale. No surprise
>>>>>> there, really.
>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>> On your part, tholingale.
>>> Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> I see that you agree that you made a classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
> claim. Good.
On what basis do you call your hallucination "good", tholingale?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please stop posting to this newsgroup.
>>>>>>>>>>>> You posted your request to three different newsgroups, therefore
>>>>>>>>>>>> your usage of "this" is both incorrect and ambiguous.
>>>>>>>>>>> At least I cross-posted to three different newsgroups,
>>>>>>>>>> Glad to see you acknowledge your trolling behavior, tholingale.
>>>>>>>>> You incorrectly presuppose that cross-posting equals trolling,
>>>>>>>>> Tholen.
>>>>>>>> Not in your case, tholingale.
>>>>>>> I know that cross-posting does not equal trolling in my case, Tholen,
>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>> Stop lying, Tholen.
>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition of lying.
>>> Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> I see that you agree that you made a classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
> claim. Good.
On what basis do you call your hallucination "good", tholingale?
>>>>>>> but that doesn't necessarily mean that anyone else who cross-posts is
>>>>>>> trolling.
>>>>>> Irrelevant, given that I wasn't dealing with anyone else, tholingale;
>>>>>> rather, I was dealing with you.
>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>> On your part, tholingale.
>>> Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> I see that you agree that you made a classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
> claim. Good.
On what basis do you call your hallucination "good", tholingale?
>>>>>>>>>>> unlike you,
>>>>>>>>>> Glad to see you realize that I did not engage in any trolling
>>>>>>>>>> behavior, tholingale.
>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition on your part, Tholen.
>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>>> On the contrary.
>>>>>> The very definition of "unsubstantiated".
>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>> On your part, tholingale.
>>> Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> I see that you agree that you made a classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
> claim. Good.
On what basis do you call your hallucination "good", tholingale?
>>>>>>>>>>> who posted two different replies to my post.
>>>>>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>>>>> Prove that you did not post two different replies to my original
>>>>>>>>> post, Tholen.
>>>>>>>> You're the one who claimed that I posted two different replies to
>>>>>>>> your post, tholingale, therefore the burden of proof falls on your
>>>>>>>> shoulders, not mine.
>>>>>>> On the contrary, the burden of proof is on your shoulders to prove
>>>>>>> your claim that you did not post two replies to my post.
>>>>>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>> Stop lying, Tholen.
>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition of lying.
>>> Yet another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim by Tholen.
>> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
> I see that you agree that you made a classic unsubstantiated and erroneous
> claim. Good.
On what basis do you call your hallucination "good", tholingale?
>>>>>>>>>>> And thank you for acknowledging that you are the Pavlovian Mutt
>>>>>>>>>>> by responding to my thread.
>>>>>>>>>> Classic erroneous presupposition. Michael Baldwin Bruce, Manco,
>&g | |
|
