| Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979005] |
Mon, 24 April 2006 16:39 |
|
http://sports.yahoo.com/ncaab/news?slug=ap-doherty-smu&p rov=ap&type=lgns
This is Southern Methodist University, I learned by searching Wikipedia.
I'm happy for him. I am a Tar Heel fan 100%, but I do support Matt Doherty
also, and am glad that we was able to hop-up a level after a year at Florida
Atlantic. It's also kind of cool in that I barely 3 months ago relocated
about 2 hours from Dallas, TX, where SMU is located. Not to say I
necessarily will see any of the games, but it's cool anyway.
Happy for him. Again, a 100% Tar Heel fan, but happy for him.
LRH
|
|
|
| Re: Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979008 ] |
Mon, 24 April 2006 18:07 |
|
I am sorry, but Matt Doherty is by far the worst coach that the
University of North Carolina has ever seen. I am glad that he is
succeeding to the best of his ability, but he is by no means of the
same caliber that a true Tarheel coach is.
|
|
|
| Re: Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979009 ] |
Mon, 24 April 2006 18:12 |
|
"Juice" <raggedyandy3478 [at] gmail.com> wrote
>I am sorry, but Matt Doherty is by far the worst coach that the
> University of North Carolina has ever seen. I am glad that he is
> succeeding to the best of his ability, but he is by no means of the
> same caliber that a true Tarheel coach is.
Try not to drool when you explain what a "true Tarheel coach" is.
--Tedward
|
|
|
| Re: Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979011 ] |
Mon, 24 April 2006 19:10 |
|
Juice writes:
> I am sorry, but Matt Doherty is by far the worst coach that the
> University of North Carolina has ever seen.
He recruited the team that won a national championship.
|
|
|
| Re: Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979012 ] |
Mon, 24 April 2006 19:11 |
|
drooling over something, and recognizing its greatness are two
completely unrelated actions. I simply recognize the greatness of the
University of North Carolina.
|
|
|
| Re: Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979014 ] |
Mon, 24 April 2006 19:25 |
|
Seeing that someone is good at basketball is something anyone can do.
He only got those players because of the reputation that Dean Smith and
Bill Guthridge left behind. Roy Williams is the man that took that
talent and go something done.
|
|
|
| Re: Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979015 ] |
Mon, 24 April 2006 19:27 |
|
"Juice" <raggedyandy3478 [at] gmail.com> wrote
> drooling over something, and recognizing its greatness are two
> completely unrelated actions. I simply recognize the greatness of the
> University of North Carolina.
Wipe your chin, then explain to Shitski why Quinn Snyder is not
a "true Blue Devil". Or something.
--Tedward
|
|
|
| Re: Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979016 ] |
Mon, 24 April 2006 20:09 |
|
In article <1145899514.484649.22500 [at] i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"Juice" <raggedyandy3478 [at] gmail.com> wrote:
> Seeing that someone is good at basketball is something anyone can do.
> He only got those players because of the reputation that Dean Smith and
> Bill Guthridge left behind. Roy Williams is the man that took that
> talent and go something done.
Dean Smith nothin'. It was all the Gut -- remember, he built the 2002
powerhouse. Jason Capel, Kris Lang and friends didn't come to UNC
uninvited -- Gut brought 'em there.
- geoff
|
|
|
| Re: Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979023 ] |
Mon, 24 April 2006 20:27 |
|
Juice writes:
> Roy Williams is the man that took that talent and go something done.
He had talent elsewhere, but didn't get it done.
|
|
|
| Digest 87437990 [message #979032 ] |
Mon, 24 April 2006 21:07 |
|
tholen [at] antispam.ham wrote:
> Juice writes:
>
> > Roy Williams is the man that took that talent and go something done.
>
> He had talent elsewhere, but didn't get it done.
On what basis do you make that claim?
|
|
|
| Re: Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979035 ] |
Mon, 24 April 2006 22:27 |
|
On Mon, 24 Apr, tholen [at] antispam.ham wrote:
> Juice writes:
>> I am sorry, but Matt Doherty is by far the worst coach that the
>> University of North Carolina has ever seen.
>
> He recruited the team that won a national championship.
He got lucky to get the three underclass stars of McCants, May, and Felton.
McCants and Felton were UNC's to lose. All any UNC coach had to do was
offer. That's not recruiting. May was also handed to UNC by a father who
adored Dean Smith (second only to Bobby Knight, but May couldn't go to
Texas Tech as they had no schollies and likely for other reasons). Again,
all Doherty had to do was send the paperwork. Noel *asked* to walk-on to
the basketball team, and after showing he could play, Doherty agreed.
Marvin Williams was recruited by Roy Williams.
IMHO, the only players Doherty deserves "credit" for on that championship
roster are Manuel, Scott, and Jawad Williams. Sure, you can only give
credit to Roy for recruiting Marvin Williams, but Doherty doesn't get
credit for any great recruiting moves that put together a national
championship squad.
--Donnie
--
Donnie Barnes http://www.donniebarnes.com 879. V.
|
|
|
| Re: Digest 87437990 [message #979037 ] |
Mon, 24 April 2006 23:29 |
|
Hairgasm writes:
>> Juice wrote:
>>> Roy Williams is the man that took that talent and go something done.
>> He had talent elsewhere, but didn't get it done.
> On what basis do you make that claim?
On the basis of the facts, Hairgasm.
|
|
|
| Re: Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979039 ] |
Mon, 24 April 2006 23:33 |
|
Donnie Barnes writes:
>> Juice wrote:
>>> I am sorry, but Matt Doherty is by far the worst coach that the
>>> University of North Carolina has ever seen.
>> He recruited the team that won a national championship.
> He got lucky to get the three underclass stars of McCants, May, and Felton.
Figures that you'd blame it on luck.
> but Doherty doesn't get credit for any great recruiting moves that
> put together a national championship squad.
Certainly not from you.
|
|
|
| Re: Digest 87437991 [message #979041 ] |
Mon, 24 April 2006 23:48 |
|
Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
> Hairgasm writes:
>
> >> Juice wrote:
>
> >>> Roy Williams is the man that took that talent and go something done.
>
> >> He had talent elsewhere, but didn't get it done.
>
> > On what basis do you make that claim?
>
> On the basis of the facts, Hairgasm.
What alleged facts, Tholen?
|
|
|
| Re: Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979043 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 00:13 |
|
On Mon, 24 Apr, tholen [at] antispam.ham wrote:
>> He got lucky to get the three underclass stars of McCants, May, and Felton.
>
> Figures that you'd blame it on luck.
So you refute the evidence that those players were coming to UNC regardless
of who the coach was?
>> but Doherty doesn't get credit for any great recruiting moves that
>> put together a national championship squad.
>
> Certainly not from you.
Nor anyone who knows anything about those actual recruiting situations.
--Donnie
--
Donnie Barnes http://www.donniebarnes.com 879. V.
|
|
|
| Re: Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979047 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 02:21 |
|
Donnie Barnes writes:
>>> He got lucky to get the three underclass stars of McCants, May, and Felton.
>> Figures that you'd blame it on luck.
> So you refute the evidence that those players were coming to UNC regardless
> of who the coach was?
On what basis do you make that claim?
>>> but Doherty doesn't get credit for any great recruiting moves that
>>> put together a national championship squad.
>> Certainly not from you.
> Nor anyone who knows anything about those actual recruiting situations.
On what basis do you make that claim?
|
|
|
| Re: Digest 87437991 [message #979049 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 02:27 |
|
Hairgasm writes:
> Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
Classic dishonesty, given that "Pavlovian Mutt" did not write the text
below, Hairgasm.
>> Hairgasm wrote:
>>>> Juice wrote:
>>>>> Roy Williams is the man that took that talent and go something done.
>>>> He had talent elsewhere, but didn't get it done.
>>> On what basis do you make that claim?
>> On the basis of the facts, Hairgasm.
> What alleged facts, Tholen?
Why are you addressing the alleged "Pavlovian Mutt" as "Tholen", Hairgasm?
Classic inconsistency.
|
|
|
| Re: Digest 87437992 [message #979056 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 05:04 |
|
<tholen [at] antispam.ham> AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote in message
news:E1e3g.14305$3W1.7249 [at] tornado.socal.rr.com...
> Hairgasm writes:
>
>> Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
>
> Classic dishonesty, given that "Pavlovian Mutt" did not write the text
> below, Hairgasm.
Yes, you did write it.
>>> Hairgasm wrote:
>
>>>>> Juice wrote:
>
>>>>>> Roy Williams is the man that took that talent and go something done.
>
>>>>> He had talent elsewhere, but didn't get it done.
>
>>>> On what basis do you make that claim?
>
>>> On the basis of the facts, Hairgasm.
>
>> What alleged facts, Tholen?
>
> Why are you addressing the alleged "Pavlovian Mutt" as "Tholen", Hairgasm?
> Classic inconsistency.
Nothing wrong with calling you by your nickname, Pavlovian Mutt, Pavlovian
Mutt.
|
|
|
| Re: Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979064 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 16:44 |
|
"Donnie Barnes" <djbSPAMSUCKS [at] donniebarnes.com> wrote
>>> He got lucky to get the three underclass stars of McCants, May, and Felton.
>>
>> Figures that you'd blame it on luck.
>
> So you refute the evidence that those players were coming to UNC regardless
> of who the coach was?
A weasel could have landed those three.
--Tedward
|
|
|
| Re: Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979067 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 16:54 |
|
"Edward M. Kennedy" <nospam [at] baconburger.com> wrote in message
news:e2lbe2$il0$1 [at] gargoyle.oit.duke.edu...
> A weasel
www.theweasels.com
|
|
|
| Re: Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979071 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 17:26 |
|
Edward M. Kennedy wrote:
> "Juice" <raggedyandy3478 [at] gmail.com> wrote
>
> >I am sorry, but Matt Doherty is by far the worst coach that the
> > University of North Carolina has ever seen. I am glad that he is
> > succeeding to the best of his ability, but he is by no means of the
> > same caliber that a true Tarheel coach is.
>
> Try not to drool when you explain what a "true Tarheel coach" is.
>
> --Tedward
Tedward has a special keyboard that get slippery and wet if you drool
while posting.
Is there really any such thing as a "true Tarheel coach"?
What about a "true UCLA coach"?
They are still searching for the "true NC State coach".
Grasshopper, it's luck if you get such a good run at the top that you
forget about the
impermanance of it all.
Impermanence (Sanskrit: =E0=A4=85=E0=A4=A8=E0=A4=BF=E0=A4=A4=E0=A5=8D=E0=A4=
=AF anitya; P=C4=81li
=E0=A4=85=E0=A4=A8=E0=A4=BF=E0=A4=9A=E0=A5=8D=E0=A4=9A anicca; Tibetan: mi =
rtag pa; Chinese: =E7=84=A1=E5=B8=B8
w=C3=BAch=C3=A1ng; Japanese: =E7=84=A1=E5=B8=B8 muj=C5=8D) is one of the es=
sential doctrines or
the three marks of Buddhism. According to it, everything is constantly
in flux. This changing flux excludes nothing--even planets, stars and
gods. This is embodied in human life in the aging process and the cycle
of birth and rebirth (samsara), and in any experience of loss; because
things are impermanent, attachment to them is futile, and leads to
suffering. The only true end of anicca is Nirvana. Nirvana is the one
Reality which knows of no change, decay or death. In the Mahayana
Mahaparinirvana Sutra, all compounded, constructed things and states
are said to be "impermanent" - but to say the same of Nirvana and the
Buddha (the personalisation of Nirvana) is to commit a gross error in
understanding and to fall into harmful misperception of Truth (as
discussed in the Mahaparinirvana Sutra).
Anicca is intimately associated with the doctrine of anatta, according
to which things have no fixed nature.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Impermanence
|
|
|
| Re: Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979072 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 17:38 |
|
"Mr. Poologic.com" <tadamsmar [at] yahoo.com> wrote
> They are still searching for the "true NC State coach".
They screwed the pooch when they hired Herb.
They should have waited till a real coach was
available.
--Tedward
|
|
|
| Re: Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979073 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 17:39 |
|
On Tue, 25 Apr, Edward M. Kennedy wrote:
> "Donnie Barnes" <djbSPAMSUCKS [at] donniebarnes.com> wrote
>
>>>> He got lucky to get the three underclass stars of McCants, May, and Felton.
>>>
>>> Figures that you'd blame it on luck.
>>
>> So you refute the evidence that those players were coming to UNC regardless
>> of who the coach was?
>
> A weasel could have landed those three.
Hindsight is 20/20.
Oh, you *didn't* mean Doherty was a weasel? My bad. :-)
--Donnie
--
Donnie Barnes http://www.donniebarnes.com 879. V.
|
|
|
| Re: Digest 87437992 [message #979078 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 20:19 |
|
Hairgasm writes:
>>> Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
>> Classic dishonesty, given that "Pavlovian Mutt" did not write the text
>> below, Hairgasm.
> Yes, you did write it.
Non sequitur.
>>>> Hairgasm wrote:
>>>>>> Juice wrote:
>>>>>>> Roy Williams is the man that took that talent and go something done.
>>>>>> He had talent elsewhere, but didn't get it done.
>>>>> On what basis do you make that claim?
>>>> On the basis of the facts, Hairgasm.
>>> What alleged facts, Tholen?
>> Why are you addressing the alleged "Pavlovian Mutt" as "Tholen", Hairgasm?
>> Classic inconsistency.
> Nothing wrong with calling you by your nickname, Pavlovian Mutt,
Classic erroneous presupposition.
> Pavlovian Mutt.
Who is "Pavlovian Mutt", Hairgasm? Also suffering from attribution
problems?
|
|
|
| Re: Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979080 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 20:22 |
|
"Donnie Barnes" <djbSPAMSUCKS [at] donniebarnes.com> wrote
>>>>> He got lucky to get the three underclass stars of McCants, May, and
>>>>> Felton.
>>>>
>>>> Figures that you'd blame it on luck.
>>>
>>> So you refute the evidence that those players were coming to UNC regardless
>>> of who the coach was?
>>
>> A weasel could have landed those three.
>
> Hindsight is 20/20.
I don't need reading glasses to admire the interns.
> Oh, you *didn't* mean Doherty was a weasel? My bad. :-)
I have never speculated on his integrity, other than to
note that he is a Tarheel.
--Tedward
|
|
|
| Re: Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979081 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 20:28 |
|
Edward M. Kennedy writes:
> Donnie Barnes wrote:
>>>> He got lucky to get the three underclass stars of McCants, May, and Felton.
>>> Figures that you'd blame it on luck.
>> So you refute the evidence that those players were coming to UNC regardless
>> of who the coach was?
> A weasel could have landed those three.
K didn't.
|
|
|
| Re: Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979084 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 20:55 |
|
<tholen [at] antispam.ham> wrote
>>>>> He got lucky to get the three underclass stars of McCants, May, and
>>>>> Felton.
>
>>>> Figures that you'd blame it on luck.
>
>>> So you refute the evidence that those players were coming to UNC regardless
>>> of who the coach was?
>
>> A weasel could have landed those three.
>
> K didn't.
Your ignorance of life in NC has been noted.
--Tedward
|
|
|
| Re: Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979085 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 21:01 |
|
Edward M. Kennedy wrote:
> "Mr. Poologic.com" <tadamsmar [at] yahoo.com> wrote
>
> > They are still searching for the "true NC State coach".
>
> They screwed the pooch when they hired Herb.
> They should have waited till a real coach was
> available.
>
> --Tedward
No way. They screwed the Holstein. And the little tight Jersey if they
were lucky.
And, Indiana is still looking for the "true Indiana coach"
Heck I can only name about 4 or 5 schools that have their true coach.
Duke, UNC, UCONN, Florida, George Mason.
Someday Duke will be looking for its true coach...
|
|
|
| Re: Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979086 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 21:09 |
|
"Mr. Poologic.com" <tadamsmar [at] yahoo.com> wrote
>> > They are still searching for the "true NC State coach".
>>
>> They screwed the pooch when they hired Herb.
>> They should have waited till a real coach was
>> available.
>>
>> --Tedward
>
> No way. They screwed the Holstein. And the little tight Jersey if they
> were lucky.
>
> And, Indiana is still looking for the "true Indiana coach"
>
> Heck I can only name about 4 or 5 schools that have their true coach.
>
> Duke, UNC, UCONN, Florida, George Mason.
>
> Someday Duke will be looking for its true coach...
I've said it before, I'll say it again: Johnny Dawkins
succeeds Coach K.
--Tedward
|
|
|
| Re: Digest 87437993 [message #979088 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 21:23 |
|
tholen [at] antispam.ham AKA Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
> Hairgasm writes:
>
> >>> Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
>
> >> Classic dishonesty, given that "Pavlovian Mutt" did not write the text
> >> below, Hairgasm.
>
> > Yes, you did write it.
>
> Non sequitur.
You are incorrect.
> >>>> Hairgasm wrote:
>
> >>>>>> Juice wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> Roy Williams is the man that took that talent and go something done.
>
> >>>>>> He had talent elsewhere, but didn't get it done.
>
> >>>>> On what basis do you make that claim?
>
> >>>> On the basis of the facts, Hairgasm.
>
> >>> What alleged facts, Tholen?
>
> >> Why are you addressing the alleged "Pavlovian Mutt" as "Tholen",
> Hairgasm? >> Classic inconsistency.
>
> > Nothing wrong with calling you by your nickname, Pavlovian Mutt,
>
> Classic erroneous presupposition.
You are incorrect.
> > Pavlovian Mutt.
>
> Who is "Pavlovian Mutt", Hairgasm?
Not paying any attention, Tholen? Is the dementia taking over your brain,
Tholen?
>Also suffering from attribution
> problems?
Non sequitur.
|
|
|
| Re: Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979089 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 21:25 |
|
tholen [at] antispam.ham wrote:
> Edward M. Kennedy writes:
>
> > Donnie Barnes wrote:
>
> >>>> He got lucky to get the three underclass stars of McCants, May, and
> Felton.
>
> >>> Figures that you'd blame it on luck.
>
> >> So you refute the evidence that those players were coming to UNC
> regardless >> of who the coach was?
>
> > A weasel could have landed those three.
>
> K didn't.
You have finally posted a correct presupposition, Tholen. Good job.
|
|
|
| Re: Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979095 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 21:56 |
|
"Edward M. Kennedy" <nospam [at] baconburger.com> wrote in message
news:e2lr0a$qlu$1 [at] gargoyle.oit.duke.edu...
> I've said it before, I'll say it again: Johnny Dawkins
> succeeds Coach K.
Not sure about that, but I'm sure Dawkins has sucked Coach K's seed.
|
|
|
| Re: Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979096 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 22:02 |
|
Hairgasm writes:
>> Edward M. Kennedy wrote:
>>> Donnie Barnes wrote:
>>>>>> He got lucky to get the three underclass stars of McCants, May, and Felton.
>>>>> Figures that you'd blame it on luck.
>>>> So you refute the evidence that those players were coming to UNC
>>>> regardless of who the coach was?
>>> A weasel could have landed those three.
>> K didn't.
> You have finally posted a correct presupposition, Tholen. Good job.
Facts are not presuppositions, Hairgasm. You should learn the meanings
of words before you use them.
|
|
|
| Re: Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979098 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 22:10 |
|
tholen [at] antispam.ham wrote:
> Hairgasm writes:
>
> >> Edward M. Kennedy wrote:
>
> >>> Donnie Barnes wrote:
>
> >>>>>> He got lucky to get the three underclass stars of McCants, May, and
> Felton.
>
> >>>>> Figures that you'd blame it on luck.
>
> >>>> So you refute the evidence that those players were coming to UNC
> >>>> regardless of who the coach was?
>
> >>> A weasel could have landed those three.
>
> >> K didn't.
>
> > You have finally posted a correct presupposition, Tholen. Good job.
>
> Facts are not presuppositions, Hairgasm.
You were presupposing that K is a weasel, Tholen.
> You should learn the meanings of words before you use them.
Classic erroneous presupposition, laced with irony.
|
|
|
| Re: Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979100 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 22:16 |
|
<Hairgasm> wrote
>> >>>>>> He got lucky to get the three underclass stars of McCants, May, and
>> Felton.
>>
>> >>>>> Figures that you'd blame it on luck.
>>
>> >>>> So you refute the evidence that those players were coming to UNC
>> >>>> regardless of who the coach was?
>>
>> >>> A weasel could have landed those three.
>>
>> >> K didn't.
>>
>> > You have finally posted a correct presupposition, Tholen. Good job.
>>
>> Facts are not presuppositions, Hairgasm.
>
> You were presupposing that K is a weasel, Tholen.
When it's patently clear he's a ferret.
--Tedward
|
|
|
| Re: Digest 87437993 [message #979102 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 22:19 |
|
Hairgasm writes:
>>>>> Pavlovian Mutt wrote:
>>>> Classic dishonesty, given that "Pavlovian Mutt" did not write the text
>>>> below, Hairgasm.
>>> Yes, you did write it.
>> Non sequitur.
> You are incorrect.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>>>>> Hairgasm wrote:
>>>>>>>> Juice wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Roy Williams is the man that took that talent and go something done.
>>>>>>>> He had talent elsewhere, but didn't get it done.
>>>>>>> On what basis do you make that claim?
>>>>>> On the basis of the facts, Hairgasm.
>>>>> What alleged facts, Tholen?
>>>> Why are you addressing the alleged "Pavlovian Mutt" as "Tholen",
>>>> Hairgasm? Classic inconsistency.
>>> Nothing wrong with calling you by your nickname, Pavlovian Mutt,
>> Classic erroneous presupposition.
> You are incorrect.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>>> Pavlovian Mutt.
>> Who is "Pavlovian Mutt", Hairgasm?
> Not paying any attention, Tholen?
What does your question have to do with college basketball, Hairgasm?
> Is the dementia taking over your brain, Tholen?
Classic erroneous presupposition.
>> Also suffering from attribution problems?
> Non sequitur.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
|
|
|
| Re: Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979103 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 22:20 |
|
Edward M. Kennedy writes:
>>>>>> He got lucky to get the three underclass stars of McCants, May, and
>>>>>> Felton.
>>>>> Figures that you'd blame it on luck.
>>>> So you refute the evidence that those players were coming to UNC regardless
>>>> of who the coach was?
>>> A weasel could have landed those three.
>> K didn't.
> Your ignorance of life in NC has been noted.
Classic erroneous presupposition.
Your dishonesty has been noted, given your earlier claims about not
responding to me.
|
|
|
| Re: Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979104 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 22:22 |
|
Hairgasm writes:
>>>> Edward M. Kennedy wrote:
>>>>> Donnie Barnes wrote:
>>>>>>>> He got lucky to get the three underclass stars of McCants, May, and
>>>>>>>> Felton.
>>>>>>> Figures that you'd blame it on luck.
>>>>>> So you refute the evidence that those players were coming to UNC
>>>>>> regardless of who the coach was?
>>>>> A weasel could have landed those three.
>>>> K didn't.
>>> You have finally posted a correct presupposition, Tholen. Good job.
>> Facts are not presuppositions, Hairgasm.
> You were presupposing that K is a weasel, Tholen.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
>> You should learn the meanings of words before you use them.
> Classic erroneous presupposition, laced with irony.
Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
|
|
|
| Re: Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979105 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 22:23 |
|
Edward M. Kennedy writes:
> Hairgasm wrote:
>>>>>>>>> He got lucky to get the three underclass stars of McCants, May, and Felton.
>>>>>>>> Figures that you'd blame it on luck.
>>>>>>> So you refute the evidence that those players were coming to UNC
>>>>>>> regardless of who the coach was?
>>>>>> A weasel could have landed those three.
>>>>> K didn't.
>>>> You have finally posted a correct presupposition, Tholen. Good job.
>>> Facts are not presuppositions, Hairgasm.
>> You were presupposing that K is a weasel, Tholen.
> When it's patently clear he's a ferret.
It's patently clear that he didn't land those three.
|
|
|
| Re: Matt Doherty: New Coach at SMU [message #979108 ] |
Tue, 25 April 2006 22:27 |
|
tholen [at] antispam.ham wrote:
> Hairgasm writes:
>
> >>>> Edward M. Kennedy wrote:
>
> >>>>> Donnie Barnes wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> He got lucky to get the three underclass stars of McCants, May, and
> >>>>>>>> Felton.
>
> >>>>>>> Figures that you'd blame it on luck.
>
> >>>>>> So you refute the evidence that those players were coming to UNC
> >>>>>> regardless of who the coach was?
>
> >>>>> A weasel could have landed those three.
>
> >>>> K didn't.
>
> >>> You have finally posted a correct presupposition, Tholen. Good job.
>
> >> Facts are not presuppositions, Hairgasm.
>
> > You were presupposing that K is a weasel, Tholen.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Stop lying, Tholen.
>
> >> You should learn the meanings of words before you use them.
>
> > Classic erroneous presupposition, laced with irony.
>
> Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim.
Stop lying, Tholen.
|
|
|
