| BE tournament - Pitt invitational [message #875976] |
Sat, 11 March 2006 05:56 |
|
In the finals *again*?
Congrats to Jaybird.
|
|
|
| Re: BE tournament - Pitt invitational [message #875979 ] |
Sat, 11 March 2006 06:00 |
|
Pauli G wrote:
> In the finals *again*?
>
> Congrats to Jaybird.
thankful that uconn isn't there like previous years
|
|
|
| Re: BE tournament - Pitt invitational [message #875983 ] |
Sat, 11 March 2006 06:09 |
|
Jaybyrd wrote:
> Pauli G wrote:
> > In the finals *again*?
> >
> > Congrats to Jaybird.
>
> thankful that uconn isn't there like previous years
This isn't the UConn of previous years. I fear an implossion has
already been foreshadowed. Some are saying the 'Cuse game was just
another loss, no big deal - normally I'd agree, but I found it very
unsettling.
|
|
|
| Re: BE tournament - Pitt invitational [message #875987 ] |
Sat, 11 March 2006 07:48 |
|
Pauli G wrote:
> In the finals *again*?
>
> Congrats to Jaybird.
Why? Did Jaybird sink a hook shot to win the game?
|
|
|
| Re: BE tournament - Pitt invitational [message #875988 ] |
Sat, 11 March 2006 08:15 |
|
If you want me to go on arguing, you'll have to pay for another five
minutes, "Jaybyrd" <jaybyrdbird [at] yahoo.com>!
> Pauli G wrote:
>> In the finals *again*?
>>
>> Congrats to Jaybird.
>
> thankful that uconn isn't there like previous years
Well, it's been a great run, but no way we got anything left in the
tank for Pitt. It's nice the Oranges are at least there to defend
their championship.
We'll just take our whuppin' and our 8 seed and slink back home.
--
Cheers,
--Jeff
Let's Go Orange!
|
|
|
| Re: BE tournament - Pitt invitational [message #875994 ] |
Sat, 11 March 2006 14:44 |
|
leinbacker wrote:
> Pauli G wrote:
> > In the finals *again*?
> >
> > Congrats to Jaybird.
>
>
> Why? Did Jaybird sink a hook shot to win the game?
YSB ($1)
|
|
|
| Re: BE tournament - Pitt invitational [message #875995 ] |
Sat, 11 March 2006 14:47 |
|
OrangeDood wrote:
> If you want me to go on arguing, you'll have to pay for another five
> minutes, "Jaybyrd" <jaybyrdbird [at] yahoo.com>!
>
> > Pauli G wrote:
> >> In the finals *again*?
> >>
> >> Congrats to Jaybird.
> >
> > thankful that uconn isn't there like previous years
>
> Well, it's been a great run, but no way we got anything left in the
> tank for Pitt. It's nice the Oranges are at least there to defend
> their championship.
>
> We'll just take our whuppin' and our 8 seed and slink back home.
>
Nice try. Of course we know they'll be two OT's and Jerry will sink
one at the buzzer from half court as he's fouled.
|
|
|
| Re: BE tournament - Pitt invitational [message #875999 ] |
Sat, 11 March 2006 15:31 |
|
If you want me to go on arguing, you'll have to pay for another
five minutes, "Jaybyrd" <jaybyrdbird [at] yahoo.com>!
>> Well, it's been a great run, but no way we got anything left in
>> the tank for Pitt. It's nice the Oranges are at least there to
>> defend their championship.
>>
>> We'll just take our whuppin' and our 8 seed and slink back
>> home.
>
> Nice try. Of course we know they'll be two OT's and Jerry will
> sink one at the buzzer from half court as he's fouled.
Don't forget the broken leg, ala Karate Kid...
--
Cheers,
--Jeff
Let's Go Orange!
|
|
|
| Re: BE tournament - Pitt invitational [message #876000 ] |
Sat, 11 March 2006 15:32 |
|
In article <Xns978360B8586EFClockwork [at] 67.19.196.138>,
OrangeDood <no_this_isnt [at] my_email.com> wrote:
> If you want me to go on arguing, you'll have to pay for another
> five minutes, "Jaybyrd" <jaybyrdbird [at] yahoo.com>!
>
> >> Well, it's been a great run, but no way we got anything left in
> >> the tank for Pitt. It's nice the Oranges are at least there to
> >> defend their championship.
> >>
> >> We'll just take our whuppin' and our 8 seed and slink back
> >> home.
> >
> > Nice try. Of course we know they'll be two OT's and Jerry will
> > sink one at the buzzer from half court as he's fouled.
>
> Don't forget the broken leg, ala Karate Kid...
He'll need to be careful; that move can be a travel if he's picked up
his dribble.
- geoff
|
|
|
| Re: BE tournament - Pitt invitational [message #876006 ] |
Sat, 11 March 2006 17:50 |
|
OrangeDood wrote:
> If you want me to go on arguing, you'll have to pay for another five
> minutes, "Jaybyrd" <jaybyrdbird [at] yahoo.com>!
>
>
>>Pauli G wrote:
>>
>>>In the finals *again*?
>>>
>>>Congrats to Jaybird.
>>
>>thankful that uconn isn't there like previous years
>
>
> Well, it's been a great run, but no way we got anything left in the
> tank for Pitt. It's nice the Oranges are at least there to defend
> their championship.
>
> We'll just take our whuppin' and our 8 seed and slink back home.
>
That's the stinkiest anti-woof I've seen. It's like last year man - the
'cuse is UNSTOPPABLE!!1!
--
I'm so hip I have trouble seeing over my pelvis.
I'm so cool you can keep a side of meat in me for months.
|
|
|
| Re: BE tournament - Pitt invitational [message #876008 ] |
Sat, 11 March 2006 18:11 |
|
If you want me to go on arguing, you'll have to pay for another
five minutes, Zaphod Beeblebrox <victor.kingNOSPAM [at] comcast.net>!
> OrangeDood wrote:
>> If you want me to go on arguing, you'll have to pay for another
>> five minutes, "Jaybyrd" <jaybyrdbird [at] yahoo.com>!
>>>Pauli G wrote:
>>>
>>>>In the finals *again*?
>>>>
>>>>Congrats to Jaybird.
>>>
>>>thankful that uconn isn't there like previous years
>>
>> Well, it's been a great run, but no way we got anything left in
>> the tank for Pitt. It's nice the Oranges are at least there to
>> defend their championship.
>>
>> We'll just take our whuppin' and our 8 seed and slink back
>> home.
>
> That's the stinkiest anti-woof I've seen. It's like last year
> man - the 'cuse is UNSTOPPABLE!!1!
There's no Hakim Warrick this year to deal with Krauser.
No, we're just fucked, I'm afraid.
--
Cheers,
--Jeff
Let's Go Orange!
|
|
|
| Re: BE tournament - Pitt invitational [message #876010 ] |
Sat, 11 March 2006 19:55 |
|
Pauli G wrote:
> Jaybyrd wrote:
> > Pauli G wrote:
> > > In the finals *again*?
> > >
> > > Congrats to Jaybird.
> >
> > thankful that uconn isn't there like previous years
>
> This isn't the UConn of previous years. I fear an implossion has
> already been foreshadowed. Some are saying the 'Cuse game was just
> another loss, no big deal - normally I'd agree, but I found it very
> unsettling.
You could insert about a two dozen teams in place of "UConn" and say
the same thing though.
Jon
|
|
|
| Re: BE tournament - Pitt invitational [message #876044 ] |
Sun, 12 March 2006 05:44 |
|
OrangeDood wrote:
> If you want me to go on arguing, you'll have to pay for another
> five minutes, Zaphod Beeblebrox <victor.kingNOSPAM [at] comcast.net>!
>
> > OrangeDood wrote:
> >> If you want me to go on arguing, you'll have to pay for another
> >> five minutes, "Jaybyrd" <jaybyrdbird [at] yahoo.com>!
> >>>Pauli G wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>In the finals *again*?
> >>>>
> >>>>Congrats to Jaybird.
> >>>
> >>>thankful that uconn isn't there like previous years
> >>
> >> Well, it's been a great run, but no way we got anything left in
> >> the tank for Pitt. It's nice the Oranges are at least there to
> >> defend their championship.
> >>
> >> We'll just take our whuppin' and our 8 seed and slink back
> >> home.
> >
> > That's the stinkiest anti-woof I've seen. It's like last year
> > man - the 'cuse is UNSTOPPABLE!!1!
>
> There's no Hakim Warrick this year to deal with Krauser.
>
> No, we're just fucked, I'm afraid.
>
blah.
|
|
|
| Re: BE tournament - Pitt invitational [message #876045 ] |
Sun, 12 March 2006 05:48 |
|
Jaybyrd wrote:
> leinbacker wrote:
> > Pauli G wrote:
> > > In the finals *again*?
> > >
> > > Congrats to Jaybird.
> >
> >
> > Why? Did Jaybird sink a hook shot to win the game?
>
> YSB ($1)
He's just being a dyk.
|
|
|
| Re: BE tournament - Pitt invitational [message #897861 ] |
Sat, 11 March 2006 06:00 |
|
Pauli G wrote:
> In the finals *again*?
>
> Congrats to Jaybird.
thankful that uconn isn't there like previous years
|
|
|
| Re: BE tournament - Pitt invitational [message #897871 ] |
Sat, 11 March 2006 06:09 |
|
Jaybyrd wrote:
> Pauli G wrote:
> > In the finals *again*?
> >
> > Congrats to Jaybird.
>
> thankful that uconn isn't there like previous years
This isn't the UConn of previous years. I fear an implossion has
already been foreshadowed. Some are saying the 'Cuse game was just
another loss, no big deal - normally I'd agree, but I found it very
unsettling.
|
|
|
| Re: BE tournament - Pitt invitational [message #897901 ] |
Sat, 11 March 2006 07:48 |
|
Pauli G wrote:
> In the finals *again*?
>
> Congrats to Jaybird.
Why? Did Jaybird sink a hook shot to win the game?
|
|
|
| Re: BE tournament - Pitt invitational [message #897906 ] |
Sat, 11 March 2006 08:15 |
|
If you want me to go on arguing, you'll have to pay for another five
minutes, "Jaybyrd" <jaybyrdbird [at] yahoo.com>!
> Pauli G wrote:
>> In the finals *again*?
>>
>> Congrats to Jaybird.
>
> thankful that uconn isn't there like previous years
Well, it's been a great run, but no way we got anything left in the
tank for Pitt. It's nice the Oranges are at least there to defend
their championship.
We'll just take our whuppin' and our 8 seed and slink back home.
--
Cheers,
--Jeff
Let's Go Orange!
|
|
|
| Re: BE tournament - Pitt invitational [message #897944 ] |
Sat, 11 March 2006 14:44 |
|
leinbacker wrote:
> Pauli G wrote:
> > In the finals *again*?
> >
> > Congrats to Jaybird.
>
>
> Why? Did Jaybird sink a hook shot to win the game?
YSB ($1)
|
|
|
| Re: BE tournament - Pitt invitational [message #897946 ] |
Sat, 11 March 2006 14:47 |
|
OrangeDood wrote:
> If you want me to go on arguing, you'll have to pay for another five
> minutes, "Jaybyrd" <jaybyrdbird [at] yahoo.com>!
>
> > Pauli G wrote:
> >> In the finals *again*?
> >>
> >> Congrats to Jaybird.
> >
> > thankful that uconn isn't there like previous years
>
> Well, it's been a great run, but no way we got anything left in the
> tank for Pitt. It's nice the Oranges are at least there to defend
> their championship.
>
> We'll just take our whuppin' and our 8 seed and slink back home.
>
Nice try. Of course we know they'll be two OT's and Jerry will sink
one at the buzzer from half court as he's fouled.
|
|
|
| Re: BE tournament - Pitt invitational [message #897951 ] |
Sat, 11 March 2006 15:31 |
|
If you want me to go on arguing, you'll have to pay for another
five minutes, "Jaybyrd" <jaybyrdbird [at] yahoo.com>!
>> Well, it's been a great run, but no way we got anything left in
>> the tank for Pitt. It's nice the Oranges are at least there to
>> defend their championship.
>>
>> We'll just take our whuppin' and our 8 seed and slink back
>> home.
>
> Nice try. Of course we know they'll be two OT's and Jerry will
> sink one at the buzzer from half court as he's fouled.
Don't forget the broken leg, ala Karate Kid...
--
Cheers,
--Jeff
Let's Go Orange!
|
|
|
| Re: BE tournament - Pitt invitational [message #897952 ] |
Sat, 11 March 2006 15:32 |
|
In article <Xns978360B8586EFClockwork [at] 67.19.196.138>,
OrangeDood <no_this_isnt [at] my_email.com> wrote:
> If you want me to go on arguing, you'll have to pay for another
> five minutes, "Jaybyrd" <jaybyrdbird [at] yahoo.com>!
>
> >> Well, it's been a great run, but no way we got anything left in
> >> the tank for Pitt. It's nice the Oranges are at least there to
> >> defend their championship.
> >>
> >> We'll just take our whuppin' and our 8 seed and slink back
> >> home.
> >
> > Nice try. Of course we know they'll be two OT's and Jerry will
> > sink one at the buzzer from half court as he's fouled.
>
> Don't forget the broken leg, ala Karate Kid...
He'll need to be careful; that move can be a travel if he's picked up
his dribble.
- geoff
|
|
|
| Re: BE tournament - Pitt invitational [message #897982 ] |
Sat, 11 March 2006 17:50 |
|
OrangeDood wrote:
> If you want me to go on arguing, you'll have to pay for another five
> minutes, "Jaybyrd" <jaybyrdbird [at] yahoo.com>!
>
>
>>Pauli G wrote:
>>
>>>In the finals *again*?
>>>
>>>Congrats to Jaybird.
>>
>>thankful that uconn isn't there like previous years
>
>
> Well, it's been a great run, but no way we got anything left in the
> tank for Pitt. It's nice the Oranges are at least there to defend
> their championship.
>
> We'll just take our whuppin' and our 8 seed and slink back home.
>
That's the stinkiest anti-woof I've seen. It's like last year man - the
'cuse is UNSTOPPABLE!!1!
--
I'm so hip I have trouble seeing over my pelvis.
I'm so cool you can keep a side of meat in me for months.
|
|
|
| Re: BE tournament - Pitt invitational [message #897995 ] |
Sat, 11 March 2006 18:11 |
|
If you want me to go on arguing, you'll have to pay for another
five minutes, Zaphod Beeblebrox <victor.kingNOSPAM [at] comcast.net>!
> OrangeDood wrote:
>> If you want me to go on arguing, you'll have to pay for another
>> five minutes, "Jaybyrd" <jaybyrdbird [at] yahoo.com>!
>>>Pauli G wrote:
>>>
>>>>In the finals *again*?
>>>>
>>>>Congrats to Jaybird.
>>>
>>>thankful that uconn isn't there like previous years
>>
>> Well, it's been a great run, but no way we got anything left in
>> the tank for Pitt. It's nice the Oranges are at least there to
>> defend their championship.
>>
>> We'll just take our whuppin' and our 8 seed and slink back
>> home.
>
> That's the stinkiest anti-woof I've seen. It's like last year
> man - the 'cuse is UNSTOPPABLE!!1!
There's no Hakim Warrick this year to deal with Krauser.
No, we're just fucked, I'm afraid.
--
Cheers,
--Jeff
Let's Go Orange!
|
|
|
| Re: BE tournament - Pitt invitational [message #898038 ] |
Sat, 11 March 2006 19:55 |
|
Pauli G wrote:
> Jaybyrd wrote:
> > Pauli G wrote:
> > > In the finals *again*?
> > >
> > > Congrats to Jaybird.
> >
> > thankful that uconn isn't there like previous years
>
> This isn't the UConn of previous years. I fear an implossion has
> already been foreshadowed. Some are saying the 'Cuse game was just
> another loss, no big deal - normally I'd agree, but I found it very
> unsettling.
You could insert about a two dozen teams in place of "UConn" and say
the same thing though.
Jon
|
|
|
| Re: BE tournament - Pitt invitational [message #898234 ] |
Sun, 12 March 2006 05:44 |
|
OrangeDood wrote:
> If you want me to go on arguing, you'll have to pay for another
> five minutes, Zaphod Beeblebrox <victor.kingNOSPAM [at] comcast.net>!
>
> > OrangeDood wrote:
> >> If you want me to go on arguing, you'll have to pay for another
> >> five minutes, "Jaybyrd" <jaybyrdbird [at] yahoo.com>!
> >>>Pauli G wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>In the finals *again*?
> >>>>
> >>>>Congrats to Jaybird.
> >>>
> >>>thankful that uconn isn't there like previous years
> >>
> >> Well, it's been a great run, but no way we got anything left in
> >> the tank for Pitt. It's nice the Oranges are at least there to
> >> defend their championship.
> >>
> >> We'll just take our whuppin' and our 8 seed and slink back
> >> home.
> >
> > That's the stinkiest anti-woof I've seen. It's like last year
> > man - the 'cuse is UNSTOPPABLE!!1!
>
> There's no Hakim Warrick this year to deal with Krauser.
>
> No, we're just fucked, I'm afraid.
>
blah.
|
|
|
| Re: BE tournament - Pitt invitational [message #898239 ] |
Sun, 12 March 2006 05:48 |
|
Jaybyrd wrote:
> leinbacker wrote:
> > Pauli G wrote:
> > > In the finals *again*?
> > >
> > > Congrats to Jaybird.
> >
> >
> > Why? Did Jaybird sink a hook shot to win the game?
>
> YSB ($1)
He's just being a dyk.
|
|
|
