| Tempo/long run [message #864296] |
Mon, 27 February 2006 16:46 |
|
Hey group:
Can someone please explain to me the difference between a tempo run and a
long run? Thanks.
terrance
|
|
|
| Re: Tempo/long run [message #864309 ] |
Mon, 27 February 2006 19:09 |
|
terrance wrote:
> Hey group:
>
> Can someone please explain to me the difference between a tempo run and a
> long run? Thanks.
>
> terrance
>
>
Long runs are "easy" (conversational effort) and are your longest runs.
Duration depends on what your other runs are. If most are 30 min, then 1
hr may be long for you. If most runs are 1+ hrs, then 2-3 hrs might be a
long run.
I just clipped this from another group since it describes tempo run
fairly concisely.
"a tempo run is a continuous effort run of 20 to 60 minutes. The
intensity of the run meets one of the following criteria:
A) The pace one could race at for an hour;
B) Current 15K race pace
C) A pace that is 10 to 15 seconds per mile slower than current 10K race
pace."
Usually it's at constant effort, rather than varying like fartleks or
intervals or whatever. Some people recommend they be done on flat
surfaces so effort and pace are constant. Others do them on rolling
hills (reasonably gentle so the downhill effort can be maintained), so
it's constant effort, but pace may vary.
A few articles I've had bookmarked on tempo runs, if you're interested:
http://www.runningtimes.com/issues/99dec/tempo.htm
http://www.runningtimes.com/issues/03nov/pfitzinger.htm
http://www.duathlon.com/articles/3218
Dot
--
"Remorse - a good trail always makes you feel sorry that it is over no
matter how tired you are" - Matt Carpenter
|
|
|
| Re: Tempo/long run [message #864315 ] |
Mon, 27 February 2006 19:52 |
|
On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:46:11 -0500, "terrance" <ttspach [at] hotmail.com>
wrote:
>Hey group:
>
>Can someone please explain to me the difference between a tempo run and a
>long run? Thanks.
>
>terrance
>
Where's Philip?
|
|
|
| Re: Tempo/long run [message #864326 ] |
Mon, 27 February 2006 21:18 |
|
"Dot" <dot.h [at] #duh?att.net> wrote in message
news:yfHMf.13831$Zw.6098 [at] bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net...
> terrance wrote:
>
>> Hey group:
>>
>> Can someone please explain to me the difference between a tempo run and a
>> long run? Thanks.
>>
>> terrance
> Long runs are "easy" (conversational effort) and are your longest runs.
> Duration depends on what your other runs are. If most are 30 min, then 1
> hr may be long for you. If most runs are 1+ hrs, then 2-3 hrs might be a
> long run.
>
> I just clipped this from another group since it describes tempo run fairly
> concisely.
>
> "a tempo run is a continuous effort run of 20 to 60 minutes. The intensity
> of the run meets one of the following criteria:
>
> A) The pace one could race at for an hour;
> B) Current 15K race pace
> C) A pace that is 10 to 15 seconds per mile slower than current 10K race
> pace."
>
> Usually it's at constant effort, rather than varying like fartleks or
> intervals or whatever. Some people recommend they be done on flat surfaces
> so effort and pace are constant. Others do them on rolling hills
> (reasonably gentle so the downhill effort can be maintained), so it's
> constant effort, but pace may vary.
>
> A few articles I've had bookmarked on tempo runs, if you're interested:
> http://www.runningtimes.com/issues/99dec/tempo.htm
> http://www.runningtimes.com/issues/03nov/pfitzinger.htm
> http://www.duathlon.com/articles/3218
>
Dot:
Thank you very much for your response and the links. This should certainly
come to a better understanding. Thanks again.
terrance
|
|
|
