|
Sports » rec.sport.boxing » Mosley/Vargas II
| Mosley/Vargas II [message #1086907] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 01:06 |
|
Well people, I've crunched the numbers and came up with my thought on the
fight. Not thoughts as some of the more intellectual people may have caught
on to, but thought.
Shane wins with a TKO in the fifth and mostly (but not all) because of Jack.
Yes, the first fight was a different situation and both have learnt from that
but don't think that will have any type of effect tomorrow night. A
barnburner? Yes, of course as both have so much potential and everything to
gain. Doesn't it always feel this way. For fifty bucks (plus our
additional contribution to our governments because we love them) it's a deal
and a half for a big show. A really big show (uh, if someone asks from the
younger generation mention who's line that was because it makes me laugh too
much. Classic actually).
Mosley wins in the fifth. YOU heard it here first. without procrastination.
(Some day that guy's going to kill me lol)
--
Cheers
Dennis
Remove 'Elle-Kabong' to reply
|
|
|
| Re: Mosley/Vargas II [message #1086908 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 01:56 |
|
Ruddell wrote:
> Well people, I've crunched the numbers and came up with my thought on the
> fight. Not thoughts as some of the more intellectual people may have caught
> on to, but thought.
>
> Shane wins with a TKO in the fifth and mostly (but not all) because of Jack.
> Yes, the first fight was a different situation and both have learnt from that
> but don't think that will have any type of effect tomorrow night. A
> barnburner? Yes, of course as both have so much potential and everything to
> gain. Doesn't it always feel this way. For fifty bucks (plus our
> additional contribution to our governments because we love them) it's a deal
> and a half for a big show. A really big show (uh, if someone asks from the
> younger generation mention who's line that was because it makes me laugh too
> much. Classic actually).
>
> Mosley wins in the fifth. YOU heard it here first. without procrastination.
> (Some day that guy's going to kill me lol)
>
>
Vargas has become an underachiever in big fights. He starts slow and
then dominates the middle rounds until to stopped late.
We saw this with Tito, DLH, Mosley I and, a good chance that it will
happen.
I hope Vargas wins, but he has become so fragile (thyroid problems;
weight problems)that I don't think he will be able to go the distance
with Mosley so i predict another late TKO.
|
|
|
| Re: Mosley/Vargas II [message #1086910 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 02:32 |
|
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:06:11 -0600, Ruddell
<ruddell'Elle-Kabong' [at] canada.com> wrote:
>
>Well people, I've crunched the numbers and came up with my thought on the
>fight. Not thoughts as some of the more intellectual people may have caught
>on to, but thought.
>
>Shane wins with a TKO in the fifth and mostly (but not all) because of Jack.
>Yes, the first fight was a different situation and both have learnt from that
>but don't think that will have any type of effect tomorrow night. A
>barnburner? Yes, of course as both have so much potential and everything to
>gain. Doesn't it always feel this way. For fifty bucks (plus our
>additional contribution to our governments because we love them) it's a deal
>and a half for a big show. A really big show (uh, if someone asks from the
>younger generation mention who's line that was because it makes me laugh too
>much. Classic actually).
>
>Mosley wins in the fifth. YOU heard it here first. without procrastination.
>(Some day that guy's going to kill me lol)
You brought a smile to my face. Why, you might ask? In the world of
the Ole Procrastinator, by the time I got there for such a dirty deed,
you'd probably be dead of natural causes a very long time from now.
But you did remind me to get on with the next task. Thanx for that.
DCI
The Ole Procrastinator.
|
|
|
| Re: Mosley/Vargas II [message #1086913 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 03:21 |
|
Oh, a fight. I was wondering when I'd come across a fight again that made me
feel like wathcing boxing again. A sign of the state of boxing in '06.
And sorry, but this is just borderline interest. Mosley against Vargas.
Oh-so-4-years-ago against oh-so-6-years-ago. The suspense of knowing neither
of these guys will never amount to much of anything going forward anyhow.
Sarcasm aside, Mosley has the better activity rate conbined with the better
chin. Vargas has been damaged goods ever since Trinidad and De La Hoya gave
him beatings he has never overcome, mentally. And seemingly physically. Once
you know you can't beat the best even juiced you probably start fighting
just for a paycheck, and that's exactly what vargas has looked like. Shows
up for a few rounds, then gets beat, then provides the convenient excuse so
his gullible fans continue to get suckered into thinking next time he'll
*really* be there.
Sure.
Fernando, tu pierdes. Again. It's over. Even with someone past his prime,
like Mosely, you're too slow, too inactive, and too damn unsure of yourself
to really try to win. vargas just fights to not be totally embarassed, and
barely succeeds. Mosley will win.
The usual law of rematches is the guy wins faster. This time I don't think
it applies. I predict Mosley on points. Because Mosley now knows he owns him
style-wise, and being content to simply put up a boxing clinic, and vargas
knowing he's owned, and thus content to last the distance to have a better
excuse-producing platform that prolongs his non-career at what amounts to be
the top of the sport these days, but would have barely sufficed to get top
20 rankings 20 years ago.
....pablo
|
|
|
| Re: Mosley/Vargas II [message #1086914 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 05:02 |
|
Ruddell wrote:
> Well people, I've crunched the numbers and came up with my thought on the
> fight. Not thoughts as some of the more intellectual people may have caught
> on to, but thought.
>
> Shane wins with a TKO in the fifth and mostly (but not all) because of Jack.
> Yes, the first fight was a different situation and both have learnt from that
> but don't think that will have any type of effect tomorrow night. A
> barnburner? Yes, of course as both have so much potential and everything to
> gain. Doesn't it always feel this way. For fifty bucks (plus our
> additional contribution to our governments because we love them) it's a deal
> and a half for a big show. A really big show (uh, if someone asks from the
> younger generation mention who's line that was because it makes me laugh too
> much. Classic actually).
>
> Mosley wins in the fifth. YOU heard it here first. without procrastination.
> (Some day that guy's going to kill me lol)
>
I'm definitely in the Mosley late stoppage to decision camp here. He
doesn't have the pop to flat out KO the much larger Vargas, but he can
run circles around him all night.
This PPV is pretty crappy, especially since Sim/Diaz II became
Diaz/Suico. Ponce De Leon's rematch is of a entertaining fight from HBO
Latino last year, but god, $40 to see it and Randy Suico take a
beating, before what appears on paper to be a replay of last year's
bout? Blech.
And just when it can't get worse, Oleg Maskaev/Hasim Rahman II, priced
at the princely sum of $49.95 is just over the horizon, bearing with it
a pair of possibly entertaining but really ESPN2/BAD opener level
bouts. OLN, you can't come soon enough with that new boxing program.
|
|
|
| Re: Mosley/Vargas II [message #1086922 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 08:53 |
|
Pablo... you have been griping about no fights to watch for years and
years man! :)
You love boxing... bad boy...
P
pablo wrote:
> Oh, a fight. I was wondering when I'd come across a fight again that made me
> feel like wathcing boxing again. A sign of the state of boxing in '06.
>
> And sorry, but this is just borderline interest. Mosley against Vargas.
> Oh-so-4-years-ago against oh-so-6-years-ago. The suspense of knowing neither
> of these guys will never amount to much of anything going forward anyhow.
>
> Sarcasm aside, Mosley has the better activity rate conbined with the better
> chin. Vargas has been damaged goods ever since Trinidad and De La Hoya gave
> him beatings he has never overcome, mentally. And seemingly physically. Once
> you know you can't beat the best even juiced you probably start fighting
> just for a paycheck, and that's exactly what vargas has looked like. Shows
> up for a few rounds, then gets beat, then provides the convenient excuse so
> his gullible fans continue to get suckered into thinking next time he'll
> *really* be there.
>
> Sure.
>
> Fernando, tu pierdes. Again. It's over. Even with someone past his prime,
> like Mosely, you're too slow, too inactive, and too damn unsure of yourself
> to really try to win. vargas just fights to not be totally embarassed, and
> barely succeeds. Mosley will win.
>
> The usual law of rematches is the guy wins faster. This time I don't think
> it applies. I predict Mosley on points. Because Mosley now knows he owns him
> style-wise, and being content to simply put up a boxing clinic, and vargas
> knowing he's owned, and thus content to last the distance to have a better
> excuse-producing platform that prolongs his non-career at what amounts to be
> the top of the sport these days, but would have barely sufficed to get top
> 20 rankings 20 years ago.
>
> ...pablo
|
|
|
| Re: Mosley/Vargas II [message #1086933 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 18:06 |
|
On 14 Jul 2006 20:02:25 -0700, deadandrestless [at] gmail.com enlightened
us:
>
>Ruddell wrote:
>> Well people, I've crunched the numbers and came up with my thought on the
>> fight. Not thoughts as some of the more intellectual people may have caught
>> on to, but thought.
>>
>> Shane wins with a TKO in the fifth and mostly (but not all) because of Jack.
>> Yes, the first fight was a different situation and both have learnt from that
>> but don't think that will have any type of effect tomorrow night. A
>> barnburner? Yes, of course as both have so much potential and everything to
>> gain. Doesn't it always feel this way. For fifty bucks (plus our
>> additional contribution to our governments because we love them) it's a deal
>> and a half for a big show. A really big show (uh, if someone asks from the
>> younger generation mention who's line that was because it makes me laugh too
>> much. Classic actually).
>>
>> Mosley wins in the fifth. YOU heard it here first. without procrastination.
>> (Some day that guy's going to kill me lol)
>>
>
>I'm definitely in the Mosley late stoppage to decision camp here. He
>doesn't have the pop to flat out KO the much larger Vargas, but he can
>run circles around him all night.
>
>This PPV is pretty crappy, especially since Sim/Diaz II became
>Diaz/Suico. Ponce De Leon's rematch is of a entertaining fight from HBO
>Latino last year, but god, $40 to see it and Randy Suico take a
>beating, before what appears on paper to be a replay of last year's
>bout? Blech.
>
>And just when it can't get worse, Oleg Maskaev/Hasim Rahman II, priced
>at the princely sum of $49.95 is just over the horizon, bearing with it
>a pair of possibly entertaining but really ESPN2/BAD opener level
>bouts. OLN, you can't come soon enough with that new boxing program.
I've got Shane winning late as well. I'm not buying the PPV for the
reasons Pablo stated. I just don't think the undercard gives me
enough justification to plunk down the $50 it would cost. Vargas, if
he gets beat as badly as I think he will, should seriously consider
getting out of boxing after this. He's been beaten and battered
enough.
Regards,
////
(o o)
-oOO--(_)--OOo-
"Maybe, just once, someone will call me 'sir'
without adding, 'you're making a scene.'"
-- Homer Simpson
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Remove nospam to email me.
Steve
|
|
|
| Re: Mosley/Vargas II [message #1086938 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 19:35 |
|
deadandrestless [at] gmail.com wrote:
> bouts. OLN, you can't come soon enough with that new boxing program.
OLN?
STRATEGY
|
|
|
| Re: Mosley/Vargas II [message #1086940 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 19:43 |
|
I'm picking Mosley W12(116-112)
Scar TKO
"SkippyPB" <swiegand [at] neo.rr.NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:te4ib2l59ab13551ktafdhbcs6ursu9jof [at] 4ax.com...
> On 14 Jul 2006 20:02:25 -0700, deadandrestless [at] gmail.com enlightened
> us:
>
>>
>>Ruddell wrote:
>>> Well people, I've crunched the numbers and came up with my thought on
>>> the
>>> fight. Not thoughts as some of the more intellectual people may have
>>> caught
>>> on to, but thought.
>>>
>>> Shane wins with a TKO in the fifth and mostly (but not all) because of
>>> Jack.
>>> Yes, the first fight was a different situation and both have learnt from
>>> that
>>> but don't think that will have any type of effect tomorrow night. A
>>> barnburner? Yes, of course as both have so much potential and
>>> everything to
>>> gain. Doesn't it always feel this way. For fifty bucks (plus our
>>> additional contribution to our governments because we love them) it's a
>>> deal
>>> and a half for a big show. A really big show (uh, if someone asks
>>> from the
>>> younger generation mention who's line that was because it makes me laugh
>>> too
>>> much. Classic actually).
>>>
>>> Mosley wins in the fifth. YOU heard it here first. without
>>> procrastination.
>>> (Some day that guy's going to kill me lol)
>>>
>>
>>I'm definitely in the Mosley late stoppage to decision camp here. He
>>doesn't have the pop to flat out KO the much larger Vargas, but he can
>>run circles around him all night.
>>
>>This PPV is pretty crappy, especially since Sim/Diaz II became
>>Diaz/Suico. Ponce De Leon's rematch is of a entertaining fight from HBO
>>Latino last year, but god, $40 to see it and Randy Suico take a
>>beating, before what appears on paper to be a replay of last year's
>>bout? Blech.
>>
>>And just when it can't get worse, Oleg Maskaev/Hasim Rahman II, priced
>>at the princely sum of $49.95 is just over the horizon, bearing with it
>>a pair of possibly entertaining but really ESPN2/BAD opener level
>>bouts. OLN, you can't come soon enough with that new boxing program.
>
> I've got Shane winning late as well. I'm not buying the PPV for the
> reasons Pablo stated. I just don't think the undercard gives me
> enough justification to plunk down the $50 it would cost. Vargas, if
> he gets beat as badly as I think he will, should seriously consider
> getting out of boxing after this. He's been beaten and battered
> enough.
>
> Regards,
> ////
> (o o)
> -oOO--(_)--OOo-
>
>
> "Maybe, just once, someone will call me 'sir'
> without adding, 'you're making a scene.'"
> -- Homer Simpson
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Remove nospam to email me.
>
> Steve
|
|
|
| Re: Mosley/Vargas II [message #1086941 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 20:26 |
|
pablo wrote:
>
> Sarcasm aside, Mosley has the better activity rate conbined with the better
> chin. Vargas has been damaged goods ever since Trinidad and De La Hoya gave
> him beatings he has never overcome, mentally.
Actually, I think Vargas' descent started with the loss to Wright even
if Vargas was given the W. He never was the same after his train got
stopped.
-paul
|
|
|
| Re: Mosley/Vargas II [message #1086943 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 20:32 |
|
> > bouts. OLN, you can't come soon enough with that new boxing program.
>
>
>
> OLN?
OLN is teaming with Top Rank for a new boxing program. Its gonna be
weekly on Thursday nights, with classic bouts 3 times a month and one
live show every month. The debut episode (July 27th) has Anthony
Thompson and Kid Diamond in feature bouts, and a main event of Kelly
Pavlik vs. Bronco McKart. The second episode is on for August 10th, and
features Aaron Williams, Diosdado Gabi, and John Duddy in the feature
slots, with the main event being a world title bout between Brian
Viloria and Omar Romero (who's actually a very decent opponent).
|
|
|
| Re: Mosley/Vargas II [message #1086944 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 20:52 |
|
"Paul Cassel" <pcasselremove2 [at] comremovecast.net> wrote in message
news:p7udnVgQSf-hriTZnZ2dnUVZ_v-dnZ2d [at] comcast.com...
> Actually, I think Vargas' descent started with the loss to Wright even if
> Vargas was given the W. He never was the same after his train got stopped.
Vargas looked great against Ike Quartey following the Wright bout. Also,
Fernando might have beaten Trinidad had Felix not hit Vargas in the nuts
when in trouble.
|
|
|
| Re: Mosley/Vargas II [message #1086946 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 22:06 |
|
deadandrestless [at] gmail.com wrote:
> > > bouts. OLN, you can't come soon enough with that new boxing program.
> >
> >
> >
> > OLN?
>
> OLN is teaming with Top Rank for a new boxing program. Its gonna be
> weekly on Thursday nights, with classic bouts 3 times a month and one
> live show every month. The debut episode (July 27th) has Anthony
> Thompson and Kid Diamond in feature bouts, and a main event of Kelly
> Pavlik vs. Bronco McKart. The second episode is on for August 10th, and
> features Aaron Williams, Diosdado Gabi, and John Duddy in the feature
> slots, with the main event being a world title bout between Brian
> Viloria and Omar Romero (who's actually a very decent opponent).
So will it be syndicated, or is OLN an actual cable channel?
STRATEGY
|
|
|
| Re: Mosley/Vargas II [message #1086948 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 22:29 |
|
> So will it be syndicated, or is OLN an actual cable channel?
OLN is the Outdoor Life Network, a cable channel owned by Comcast and
currently running in all of their markets, as well as on Dish Network
and I believe DirectTV. They're changing the name of their network
sometime later this year to "Versus" simply because they've outgrown
the Outdoor programming. They rose to prominence as the home of the
Tour De France on US TV, and have since picked up an array of sports,
including the NHL, boxing, motocross, track and field, America's Cup,
and also run replays of Survivor.
|
|
|
| Re: Mosley/Vargas II [message #1086949 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 22:34 |
|
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 14:06:14 -0600, STRATEGY wrote
(in article <1152993974.823682.163270 [at] m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>):
>
> deadandrestless [at] gmail.com wrote:
>>>> bouts. OLN, you can't come soon enough with that new boxing program.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> OLN?
>>
>> OLN is teaming with Top Rank for a new boxing program. Its gonna be
>> weekly on Thursday nights, with classic bouts 3 times a month and one
>> live show every month. The debut episode (July 27th) has Anthony
>> Thompson and Kid Diamond in feature bouts, and a main event of Kelly
>> Pavlik vs. Bronco McKart. The second episode is on for August 10th, and
>> features Aaron Williams, Diosdado Gabi, and John Duddy in the feature
>> slots, with the main event being a world title bout between Brian
>> Viloria and Omar Romero (who's actually a very decent opponent).
>
>
> So will it be syndicated, or is OLN an actual cable channel?
I know there is an Outdoor Life Network but somehow I don't think he's
talking about that one...
--
Cheers
Dennis
Remove 'Elle-Kabong' to reply
|
|
|
| Re: Mosley/Vargas II [message #1086951 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 22:37 |
|
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 10:06:25 -0600, SkippyPB wrote
(in article <te4ib2l59ab13551ktafdhbcs6ursu9jof [at] 4ax.com>):
> I've got Shane winning late as well. I'm not buying the PPV for the
> reasons Pablo stated. I just don't think the undercard gives me
> enough justification to plunk down the $50 it would cost. Vargas, if
> he gets beat as badly as I think he will, should seriously consider
> getting out of boxing after this. He's been beaten and battered
> enough.
I dunno Skippy. For fifty bucks I figure this one is worth it. The first
show was ok and I expect a better performance by both but an outstanding one
from Shane as I've already stated. A friend is coming over and of course my
wife will be here and who knows who else. People know I get them and often
*happen* to be in the neighborhood. Plenty of beer, chips and action along
with the card. Can't be better than that.
What can you get for fifty bucks when you leave home? (Hmmm, don't go there
because this is a family channel!).
>
> Regards,
> ////
> (o o)
> -oOO--(_)--OOo-
Do you really look like that?
--
Cheers
Dennis
Remove 'Elle-Kabong' to reply
|
|
|
| Re: Mosley/Vargas II [message #1086956 ] |
Sat, 15 July 2006 23:50 |
|
The Sanity Cruzer wrote:
> "Paul Cassel" <pcasselremove2 [at] comremovecast.net> wrote in message
> news:p7udnVgQSf-hriTZnZ2dnUVZ_v-dnZ2d [at] comcast.com...
>
>> Actually, I think Vargas' descent started with the loss to Wright even if
>> Vargas was given the W. He never was the same after his train got stopped.
>
> Vargas looked great against Ike Quartey following the Wright bout. Also,
> Fernando might have beaten Trinidad had Felix not hit Vargas in the nuts
> when in trouble.
>
>
I missed Vargas - Quartey.
|
|
|
| Re: Mosley/Vargas II [message #1086960 ] |
Sun, 16 July 2006 00:30 |
|
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 18:32:12 -0600, DCI wrote
(in article <sldgb2589jf03r4bepbkbtm3nveqd8t71t [at] 4ax.com>):
> You brought a smile to my face. Why, you might ask? In the world of
> the Ole Procrastinator, by the time I got there for such a dirty deed,
> you'd probably be dead of natural causes a very long time from now.
> But you did remind me to get on with the next task. Thanx for that.
Yeah, you're all heart. Just a few more hours. Uhhh, for the fight that
is, I plan on staying around a lot longer than that...
--
Cheers
Dennis
Remove 'Elle-Kabong' to reply
|
|
|
| Re: Mosley/Vargas II [message #1086964 ] |
Sun, 16 July 2006 01:00 |
|
> I know there is an Outdoor Life Network but somehow I don't think he's
> talking about that one...
I am, actually. You can check it out here...
http://www.olntv.com/nw/article/view/19506/?UserDef=true& ;catID=76
|
|
|
| Re: Mosley/Vargas II [message #1086969 ] |
Sun, 16 July 2006 01:40 |
|
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 17:00:05 -0600, deadandrestless [at] gmail.com wrote
(in article <1153004405.696369.183440 [at] 35g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>):
>> I know there is an Outdoor Life Network but somehow I don't think he's
>> talking about that one...
>
> I am, actually. You can check it out here...
>
> http://www.olntv.com/nw/article/view/19506/?UserDef=true& ;catID=76
Learn something new every day and that's why I read rsb! Tnx...
--
Cheers
Dennis
Remove 'Elle-Kabong' to reply
|
|
|
| Re: Mosley/Vargas II [message #1086973 ] |
Sun, 16 July 2006 02:08 |
|
Anybody picking Vargas? He does have a good chance to win this time, but
Mosley is a MUCH more disciplined and faster fighter than Fernando.
Mosley W12(116-112)
Vargas will have his moments though.
Scar TKO
"Ruddell" <ruddell'Elle-Kabong' [at] canada.com> wrote in message
news:0001HW.C0DED9080005372BF0407600 [at] news.sasktel.net...
> On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 17:00:05 -0600, deadandrestless [at] gmail.com wrote
> (in article <1153004405.696369.183440 [at] 35g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>):
>
>>> I know there is an Outdoor Life Network but somehow I don't think he's
>>> talking about that one...
>>
>> I am, actually. You can check it out here...
>>
>> http://www.olntv.com/nw/article/view/19506/?UserDef=true& ;catID=76
>
>
> Learn something new every day and that's why I read rsb! Tnx...
>
> --
> Cheers
>
> Dennis
>
> Remove 'Elle-Kabong' to reply
>
|
|
|
| Re: Mosley/Vargas II [message #1087022 ] |
Sun, 16 July 2006 18:45 |
|
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 14:37:31 -0600, Ruddell
<ruddell'Elle-Kabong' [at] canada.com> enlightened us:
>On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 10:06:25 -0600, SkippyPB wrote
>(in article <te4ib2l59ab13551ktafdhbcs6ursu9jof [at] 4ax.com>):
>
>
>> I've got Shane winning late as well. I'm not buying the PPV for the
>> reasons Pablo stated. I just don't think the undercard gives me
>> enough justification to plunk down the $50 it would cost. Vargas, if
>> he gets beat as badly as I think he will, should seriously consider
>> getting out of boxing after this. He's been beaten and battered
>> enough.
>
>
>I dunno Skippy. For fifty bucks I figure this one is worth it. The first
>show was ok and I expect a better performance by both but an outstanding one
>from Shane as I've already stated. A friend is coming over and of course my
>wife will be here and who knows who else. People know I get them and often
>*happen* to be in the neighborhood. Plenty of beer, chips and action along
>with the card. Can't be better than that.
>
>What can you get for fifty bucks when you leave home? (Hmmm, don't go there
>because this is a family channel!).
>
>
>>
>> Regards,
>> ////
>> (o o)
>> -oOO--(_)--OOo-
>
>
>Do you really look like that?
My nose isn't that big.
Regards,
////
(o o)
-oOO--(_)--OOo-
"Maybe, just once, someone will call me 'sir'
without adding, 'you're making a scene.'"
-- Homer Simpson
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Remove nospam to email me.
Steve
|
|
|
| Re: Mosley/Vargas II [message #1087031 ] |
Sun, 16 July 2006 19:39 |
|
>>> Regards,
>>> ////
>>> (o o)
>>> -oOO--(_)--OOo-
>>
>>
>>Do you really look like that?
>
> My nose isn't that big.
Mine is <grin>
Scar TKO
"SkippyPB" <swiegand [at] neo.rr.NOSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:i8rkb25fiv34p7qlofr4a23ttb3nsodo22 [at] 4ax.com...
> On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 14:37:31 -0600, Ruddell
> <ruddell'Elle-Kabong' [at] canada.com> enlightened us:
>
>>On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 10:06:25 -0600, SkippyPB wrote
>>(in article <te4ib2l59ab13551ktafdhbcs6ursu9jof [at] 4ax.com>):
>>
>>
>>> I've got Shane winning late as well. I'm not buying the PPV for the
>>> reasons Pablo stated. I just don't think the undercard gives me
>>> enough justification to plunk down the $50 it would cost. Vargas, if
>>> he gets beat as badly as I think he will, should seriously consider
>>> getting out of boxing after this. He's been beaten and battered
>>> enough.
>>
>>
>>I dunno Skippy. For fifty bucks I figure this one is worth it. The first
>>show was ok and I expect a better performance by both but an outstanding
>>one
>>from Shane as I've already stated. A friend is coming over and of course
>>my
>>wife will be here and who knows who else. People know I get them and
>>often
>>*happen* to be in the neighborhood. Plenty of beer, chips and action
>>along
>>with the card. Can't be better than that.
>>
>>What can you get for fifty bucks when you leave home? (Hmmm, don't go
>>there
>>because this is a family channel!).
>>
>>
>>>
>
>
>
> Regards,
> ////
> (o o)
> -oOO--(_)--OOo-
>
>
> "Maybe, just once, someone will call me 'sir'
> without adding, 'you're making a scene.'"
> -- Homer Simpson
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Remove nospam to email me.
>
> Steve
|
|
|
Gehe zu:
aktuelle Zeit: Wed Jan 7 19:45:30 CET 2009
Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0.08710 Sekunden |
