Sports » rec.sport.pro-wrestling » Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response...
Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084338] Fri, 14 July 2006 20:15
Scott  
... is like when some loud mouth drunk is talking shit to you the whole
night... then slapps you twice and knocks your drink on your girls lap.
So then you unleash holy hell on the twat and bloddy him up a bit.

Everyone knows the dude had it coming and only a pussy Frenchman would
seriously bitch about how BAD you beat the kid up.

C'mon "American Allies": Radical Islam was/is/and always will be
"asking for it"
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084344 ] Fri, 14 July 2006 20:55
grativo  
> C'mon "American Allies": Radical Islam was/is/and always will be
> "asking for it"

Seriously, what do our "allies" expect Israel to do, when the stated
goal of Islamofacists there is to wipe out the Jewish state? Commit
mass suicede?

Grativo
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084354 ] Fri, 14 July 2006 21:35
CHF  
"Ahmed Johnson's Beer Belly v2.0" <scott [at] 1225water.com> wrote in
news:1152900948.420621.115390 [at] m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com:

> .. is like when some loud mouth drunk is talking shit to you the whole
> night... then slapps you twice and knocks your drink on your girls lap.
> So then you unleash holy hell on the twat and bloddy him up a bit.
>
> Everyone knows the dude had it coming and only a pussy Frenchman would
> seriously bitch about how BAD you beat the kid up.
>
> C'mon "American Allies": Radical Islam was/is/and always will be
> "asking for it"

The French are more civilized than any other culture in the world,
actually.
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084355 ] Fri, 14 July 2006 21:35
CHF  
"grativo" <grativo [at] aol.com> wrote in news:1152903308.311006.86750
[at] h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com:

>> C'mon "American Allies": Radical Islam was/is/and always will be
>> "asking for it"
>
> Seriously, what do our "allies" expect Israel to do, when the stated
> goal of Islamofacists there is to wipe out the Jewish state? Commit
> mass suicede?
>
> Grativo

The whole reason for the protracted conflict is that neither side has the
guts to commit to what needs to be done even though the writing's on the
wall. Pitiful suicide bombings and kidnappings, or "ferocious" responses
leaving infrastructure and civilization intact are not going to do it.

This is why the mass media should be abolished. It doesn't allow for the
necessary resolution of war since no side wants to have to bear the
world's scorn. These days entire nations get outraged to hear of one rape
or the death of 1,000 people. Back in the day, you could subjugate or
eliminate entire populations without much controversy. Everyone was in
the glorious dark.
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084366 ] Fri, 14 July 2006 21:58
grativo  
> The whole reason for the protracted conflict is that neither side has the
> guts to commit to what needs to be done even though the writing's on the
> wall. Pitiful suicide bombings and kidnappings, or "ferocious" responses
> leaving infrastructure and civilization intact are not going to do it.

I think Israelies have shown more guts, because they're saying they're
not opposed to living beside some kind of a palestinian state. It's
the Hezbollah idiots who're saying that the only way they'll make peace
is if all Jews are killed or gets out of middle east. The president of
Iran just made a speech saying that all the Arabic countries should
unite and "wipe Israel off the map".

Grativo
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084375 ] Fri, 14 July 2006 22:26
CHF  
"grativo" <grativo [at] aol.com> wrote in
news:1152907110.161415.3360 [at] p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com:

>> The whole reason for the protracted conflict is that neither side has
>> the guts to commit to what needs to be done even though the writing's
>> on the wall. Pitiful suicide bombings and kidnappings, or "ferocious"
>> responses leaving infrastructure and civilization intact are not
>> going to do it.
>
> I think Israelies have shown more guts, because they're saying they're
> not opposed to living beside some kind of a palestinian state. It's
> the Hezbollah idiots who're saying that the only way they'll make
> peace is if all Jews are killed or gets out of middle east. The
> president of Iran just made a speech saying that all the Arabic
> countries should unite and "wipe Israel off the map".

You don't offer a truce with cancer. A prissy live-and-let-live, "let's
be neighbors" response is not going to cut it. It doesn't take guts to
succumb to peer pressure. The only reason that's even on the table is
because Israel doesn't want to come off as the bad guys. If it were just
them, and the Arabs, with nobody else watching, what do you think would
happen?
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084379 ] Fri, 14 July 2006 22:27
spam  
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 19:35:49 +0000 (UTC), "Christy Hemme's Forehead"
<CHF [at] barrenwasteland.t.na> wrote:

>This is why the mass media should be abolished.

I'll drink to that.


--

Stop Repeat Offenders!
Don't Re-elect Them!
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084380 ] Fri, 14 July 2006 22:28
spam  
On 14 Jul 2006 12:58:30 -0700, "grativo" <grativo [at] aol.com> wrote:

>The president of
>Iran just made a speech saying that all the Arabic countries should
>unite and "wipe Israel off the map".

Why is he still breathing?

Where's the Mossad when you need them most?


--

Stop Repeat Offenders!
Don't Re-elect Them!
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084387 ] Fri, 14 July 2006 22:35
Notifier Deamon  
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084388 ] Fri, 14 July 2006 22:35
Atlas Bugged  
"grativo" <grativo [at] aol.com> wrote in message
news:1152907110.161415.3360 [at] p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
> I think Israelies have shown more guts, because they're saying they're
> not opposed to living beside some kind of a palestinian state. It's
> the Hezbollah idiots who're saying that the only way they'll make peace
> is if all Jews are killed or gets out of middle east. The president of
> Iran just made a speech saying that all the Arabic countries should
> unite and "wipe Israel off the map".

It's a virtual suicide attempt based upon the balances of power. USA and
Israel have declined to assist in the suicide so far.
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084391 ] Fri, 14 July 2006 22:25
Tim McGaughy  
grativo wrote:
>>The whole reason for the protracted conflict is that neither side has the
>>guts to commit to what needs to be done even though the writing's on the
>>wall. Pitiful suicide bombings and kidnappings, or "ferocious" responses
>>leaving infrastructure and civilization intact are not going to do it.
>
>
> I think Israelies have shown more guts, because they're saying they're
> not opposed to living beside some kind of a palestinian state. It's
> the Hezbollah idiots who're saying that the only way they'll make peace
> is if all Jews are killed or gets out of middle east. The president of
> Iran just made a speech saying that all the Arabic countries should
> unite and "wipe Israel off the map".

If they keep acting like petulant children, that's exactly what should
happen.

Hezbollah is a threat that needs to be eliminated, due to the terror
tactics they employ. Israel uses most of the same tactics.

Follow the logic.

The U.S. needs to stop sending aid money. When Israel is forced to make
a choice between buying bread and buying bullets, they'll start working
much harder to achieve peace.
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084414 ] Sat, 15 July 2006 00:33
Asleep  
Christy Hemme's Forehead wrote:
>
> You don't offer a truce with cancer. A prissy live-and-let-live, "let's
> be neighbors" response is not going to cut it. It doesn't take guts to
> succumb to peer pressure. The only reason that's even on the table is
> because Israel doesn't want to come off as the bad guys. If it were just
> them, and the Arabs, with nobody else watching, what do you think would
> happen?

There would eventually be no Muslims left, given Muslim hostility.

Israelis understand the Talmud well. If he comes to murder you, rise up
early and kill him first (Babylonian Talmud, Sanhedrin 72A).

Bob Kolker
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084416 ] Sat, 15 July 2006 00:35
Asleep  
Bob wrote:
>
> Why is he still breathing?
>
> Where's the Mossad when you need them most?

The Mossad are Sabrah's, not Kryptonians. Although Kalel and Jorel are
Hebraic names.

Bob Kolker
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084418 ] Sat, 15 July 2006 00:36
Asleep  
Tim McGaughy wrote:
>
> If they keep acting like petulant children, that's exactly what should
> happen.
>
> Hezbollah is a threat that needs to be eliminated, due to the terror
> tactics they employ. Israel uses most of the same tactics.
>
> Follow the logic.
>
> The U.S. needs to stop sending aid money. When Israel is forced to make
> a choice between buying bread and buying bullets, they'll start working
> much harder to achieve peace.

The only peace that is possible is for Israel to consent to its own
suicide or kill off its antagonists. There is no middle ground.

Bob Kolker
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084438 ] Fri, 14 July 2006 23:56
CHF  
Tim McGaughy <teekem [at] ispwest.com> wrote in
news:e98ukc02076 [at] enews1.newsguy.com:

> The U.S. needs to stop sending aid money. When Israel is forced to
> make a choice between buying bread and buying bullets, they'll start
> working much harder to achieve peace.

Israel only bothers to buy bullets because they are too nice to use their
nukes. Though, cutting off aid might be a good idea since it would force
the situation. Nukes don't keep forever and are expensive to maintain.
Better to use it than to lose it.

Good plan, Tim.
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084469 ] Sat, 15 July 2006 01:47
dchance  
"Christy Hemme's Forehead" <CHF [at] barrenwasteland.t.na> wrote
> The French are more civilized than any other culture in the world,
> actually.

Bow at the altar of Zidane. He would know what to do in this situation...
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084482 ] Sat, 15 July 2006 02:36
Tim McGaughy  
Robert J. Kolker wrote:
> Tim McGaughy wrote:
>
>>
>> If they keep acting like petulant children, that's exactly what should
>> happen.
>>
>> Hezbollah is a threat that needs to be eliminated, due to the terror
>> tactics they employ. Israel uses most of the same tactics.
>>
>> Follow the logic.
>>
>> The U.S. needs to stop sending aid money. When Israel is forced to
>> make a choice between buying bread and buying bullets, they'll start
>> working much harder to achieve peace.
>
>
> The only peace that is possible is for Israel to consent to its own
> suicide or kill off its antagonists. There is no middle ground.

Fine. Let them kill off their antagonists.

But while they're doing it, they need to leave the innocent civilians
the fuck alone.

They do not face the entire muslim world. They face a fundy portion of it.
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084483 ] Sat, 15 July 2006 02:38
Tim McGaughy  
Christy Hemme's Forehead wrote:
> Tim McGaughy <teekem [at] ispwest.com> wrote in
> news:e98ukc02076 [at] enews1.newsguy.com:
>
>
>>The U.S. needs to stop sending aid money. When Israel is forced to
>>make a choice between buying bread and buying bullets, they'll start
>>working much harder to achieve peace.
>
>
> Israel only bothers to buy bullets because they are too nice to use their
> nukes. Though, cutting off aid might be a good idea since it would force
> the situation. Nukes don't keep forever and are expensive to maintain.
> Better to use it than to lose it.

If Israel uses nukes, they foul their own nest. Radioactive fallout can
cover a very wide area, and they have no place to go if it happens to
blanket them.
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084503 ] Sat, 15 July 2006 03:42
Notifier Deamon  
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084506 ] Sat, 15 July 2006 04:55
Asleep  
Tim McGaughy wrote:

>
>
> Fine. Let them kill off their antagonists.
>
> But while they're doing it, they need to leave the innocent civilians
> the fuck alone.

The bastards hide behind women's skirts and baby cribs, or haven't you
noticed. Collateral damage is unavoidable.

Bob Kolker
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084524 ] Sat, 15 July 2006 04:36
lordgow  
"Robert J. Kolker" <nowhere [at] nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:4hr08qFtgm3U1 [at] individual.net...
> Tim McGaughy wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Fine. Let them kill off their antagonists.
>>
>> But while they're doing it, they need to leave the innocent civilians the
>> fuck alone.
>
> The bastards hide behind women's skirts and baby cribs, or haven't you
> noticed. Collateral damage is unavoidable.

Not to mention that to the best of their abilities the Israelis are
performing precision strikes on strategic targets instead of just lobbing
rockets "in that general direction".

LG
--
Thanks to the New York Times, the easiest job in the world right now is:
"Head of Counterintelligence -- al Qaeda." You just have to read the Times
over morning coffee, and you're done by 10 a.m.
- Ann Coulter
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084625 ] Sat, 15 July 2006 09:27
Atlas Bugged  
> Robert J. Kolker wrote:
>> The only peace that is possible is for Israel to consent to its own
>> suicide or kill off its antagonists. There is no middle ground.

"Tim McGaughy" <teekem [at] ispwest.com> wrote in message
news:e99d9n32ghs [at] enews1.newsguy.com...
> Fine. Let them kill off their antagonists.
>
> But while they're doing it, they need to leave the innocent civilians the
> fuck alone.
>
> They do not face the entire muslim world. They face a fundy portion of it.

Nonsense It's called "war." You may have heard of it. It wasn't just
invented in your lifetime.

Even the damn Nazis didn't intentionally hide among civilians thus using
them as human shields. That is a primary tactic among the fundy Muslims.

Yet 100,000 people were killed in the fire bombing of Dresden, more than
Hiroshima, and no one whined about collateral damage.

My little sister once said to me, "In WWII, why didn't they just send people
to kill Hitler?"

Of course, she was 12. You are asking the same question. What is your
excuse?
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084648 ] Sat, 15 July 2006 12:08
spam  
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 19:36:04 -0500, Tim McGaughy <teekem [at] ispwest.com>
wrote:

>But while they're doing it, they need to leave the innocent civilians
>the fuck alone.

The terrorists force civilians into combat areas - human shields. The
only response is to kill them along with the terrorists.


--

Stop Repeat Offenders!
Don't Re-elect Them!
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084649 ] Sat, 15 July 2006 12:12
spam  
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 03:27:10 -0400, "Atlas Bugged"
<atlasbuggedBYspam [at] gmail.com> wrote:

>Yet 100,000 people were killed in the fire bombing of Dresden, more than
>Hiroshima, and no one whined about collateral damage.

Actually that is not true. The leftist queers in Britain whined about
Harris - called him "Mad Bomber Harris" IIRC. He was run out of the
RAF after the war.

The amount of explosives used in the firebombing - Hamburg was first -
was about 20 kilotons. That is the estimated yield of one of the
atomic bombs used on Japan. The amount of cruise missles used against
Iraq comes out to about 20 kilotons.

It would appear that a major offensive is a 20 kiloton affair.


--

Stop Repeat Offenders!
Don't Re-elect Them!
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084653 ] Sat, 15 July 2006 13:45
Asleep  
Bob wrote:
>
> Actually that is not true. The leftist queers in Britain whined about
> Harris - called him "Mad Bomber Harris" IIRC. He was run out of the
> RAF after the war.

The wusses and pusses waited until Allied victory was virtually assured
before they remounted their moral High Horse. For Winston Churchill,
Dresden seemed a bit much. Perhaps a raid too far. Personally, I thought
the Dresden raid with a gorgeous, a thing of beauty. It was well thought
out.

Three waves:

1. Break up buildings with high explosives exposing all that varnished wood.

2. Drop incendiaries igniting same.

3. Bomb the rescue and fire corps responding to the blaze.

The dead numbered between 30,000 and 60,000. It was a Nagasaki size raid.

It was so beautiful. It almost makes we weep from admiration.

Bob Kolker
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084654 ] Sat, 15 July 2006 13:46
Asleep  
Lord Gow333, Conservative Renegade!!! wrote:

>
> "Robert J. Kolker" <nowhere [at] nowhere.com> wrote in message
> news:4hr08qFtgm3U1 [at] individual.net...
>
>> Tim McGaughy wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Fine. Let them kill off their antagonists.
>>>
>>> But while they're doing it, they need to leave the innocent civilians
>>> the fuck alone.
>>
>>
>> The bastards hide behind women's skirts and baby cribs, or haven't you
>> noticed. Collateral damage is unavoidable.
>
>
> Not to mention that to the best of their abilities the Israelis are
> performing precision strikes on strategic targets instead of just
> lobbing rockets "in that general direction".

In particular they are tagretting organization heads using the drones.

Bob Kolker
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084659 ] Sat, 15 July 2006 13:42
Tim McGaughy  
Robert J. Kolker wrote:
> Tim McGaughy wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Fine. Let them kill off their antagonists.
>>
>> But while they're doing it, they need to leave the innocent civilians
>> the fuck alone.
>
>
> The bastards hide behind women's skirts and baby cribs, or haven't you
> noticed. Collateral damage is unavoidable.

Bullshit. They can track Hezbollah down without shelling neighborhoods.
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084661 ] Sat, 15 July 2006 13:45
Tim McGaughy  
Bob wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 19:36:04 -0500, Tim McGaughy <teekem [at] ispwest.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>But while they're doing it, they need to leave the innocent civilians
>>the fuck alone.
>
>
> The terrorists force civilians into combat areas - human shields. The
> only response is to kill them along with the terrorists.

No.

Terrorists don't spend 24 hours a day hiding behind hostages.
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084666 ] Sat, 15 July 2006 14:28
spam  
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 06:45:34 -0500, Tim McGaughy <teekem [at] ispwest.com>
wrote:

>>>But while they're doing it, they need to leave the innocent civilians
>>>the fuck alone.

>> The terrorists force civilians into combat areas - human shields. The
>> only response is to kill them along with the terrorists.

>No. Terrorists don't spend 24 hours a day hiding behind hostages.

The Coalition does not spend 24 hours a day killing civilians, either.

If you were a civilian and you knew that the place you were located
was going to become a combat zone, wouldn't you leave? If you stayed
then you are a de facto combatant.

Before the invasion of Iraq, Special Ops went into Iraq and did
everything humanly possible to clear the way for invasion, including
warning civilians to get out of certain areas. If some of those people
stayed then they were in a combat zone, which makes them combatants.


--

Stop Repeat Offenders!
Don't Re-elect Them!
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084667 ] Sat, 15 July 2006 14:31
spam  
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 06:42:37 -0500, Tim McGaughy <teekem [at] ispwest.com>
wrote:

>> The bastards hide behind women's skirts and baby cribs, or haven't you
>> noticed. Collateral damage is unavoidable.

>Bullshit. They can track Hezbollah down without shelling neighborhoods.

The Israelis are under no obligation to increase their risk of
casualties just to avoid human shields.


--

Stop Repeat Offenders!
Don't Re-elect Them!
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084668 ] Sat, 15 July 2006 14:38
Stephen Fairchild  
Tim McGaughy wrote:

> Bob wrote:
>> On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 19:36:04 -0500, Tim McGaughy <teekem [at] ispwest.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>But while they're doing it, they need to leave the innocent civilians
>>>the fuck alone.
>>
>>
>> The terrorists force civilians into combat areas - human shields. The
>> only response is to kill them along with the terrorists.
>
> No.
>
> Terrorists don't spend 24 hours a day hiding behind hostages.

Sure they don't not when they are at home but when they are in combat it's
another story.

As for innocent civilians there are none under Islam. You are either one of
them or you are one of us. That's why its okay for them to blow up trains
full of commuters. Those muslim human shields are partially unwilling
draftees on the side of Islam. The terrorists regard them as doing their
part and will be rewarded in the afterlife. If they were not to happy to
be on the battlefield you can bet that most of them were armchair
supporters and some of them were financial donors.

What is going on in Lebanon right now is merely the latest flare-up in a war
against western civilisation that has been going on for 1400 years.
--
Stephen Fairchild
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084669 ] Sat, 15 July 2006 15:38
Asleep  
Bob wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 06:45:34 -0500, Tim McGaughy <teekem [at] ispwest.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>>>But while they're doing it, they need to leave the innocent civilians
>>>>the fuck alone.
>
>
>
>>>The terrorists force civilians into combat areas - human shields. The
>>>only response is to kill them along with the terrorists.
>
>
>>No. Terrorists don't spend 24 hours a day hiding behind hostages.
>
>
> The Coalition does not spend 24 hours a day killing civilians, either.
>
> If you were a civilian and you knew that the place you were located
> was going to become a combat zone, wouldn't you leave? If you stayed
> then you are a de facto combatant.
>
> Before the invasion of Iraq, Special Ops went into Iraq and did
> everything humanly possible to clear the way for invasion, including
> warning civilians to get out of certain areas. If some of those people
> stayed then they were in a combat zone, which makes them combatants.

Not really. But it does put them in the line of fire. If non-combatents
stay in a kill-zone they have no business complaining if they become
collateral targets.

Bob Kolker

>
>
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084670 ] Sat, 15 July 2006 15:39
Asleep  
Bob wrote:

> On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 06:42:37 -0500, Tim McGaughy <teekem [at] ispwest.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>>>The bastards hide behind women's skirts and baby cribs, or haven't you
>>>noticed. Collateral damage is unavoidable.
>
>
>>Bullshit. They can track Hezbollah down without shelling neighborhoods.
>
>
> The Israelis are under no obligation to increase their risk of
> casualties just to avoid human shields.

Amen. Selah. It is the agressors who launch their attacks from areas in
which civillians live that are to blame for civillian casualities.

Bob Kolker

>
>
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084671 ] Sat, 15 July 2006 15:42
Asleep  
Stephen Fairchild wrote:
>
> What is going on in Lebanon right now is merely the latest flare-up in a war
> against western civilisation that has been going on for 1400 years.

You are among the few who understand this.

Bob Kolker
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084678 ] Sat, 15 July 2006 15:28
spam  
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 08:38:57 -0500, "Robert J. Kolker"
<nowhere [at] nowhere.com> wrote:

>> Before the invasion of Iraq, Special Ops went into Iraq and did
>> everything humanly possible to clear the way for invasion, including
>> warning civilians to get out of certain areas. If some of those people
>> stayed then they were in a combat zone, which makes them combatants.

>Not really.

What do you mean? We are saying the same thing.

>But it does put them in the line of fire. If non-combatents
>stay in a kill-zone they have no business complaining if they become
>collateral targets.


--

Stop Repeat Offenders!
Don't Re-elect Them!
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084680 ] Sat, 15 July 2006 15:30
spam  
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 13:38:17 +0100, Stephen Fairchild
<somebody [at] somewhere.com> wrote:

>What is going on in Lebanon right now is merely the latest flare-up in a war
>against western civilisation that has been going on for 1400 years.

All the more reason to extinguish it once and for all.

On the road to Armegeddon...


--

Stop Repeat Offenders!
Don't Re-elect Them!
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084681 ] Sat, 15 July 2006 15:32
spam  
On Sat, 15 Jul 2006 08:42:31 -0500, "Robert J. Kolker"
<nowhere [at] nowhere.com> wrote:

>> What is going on in Lebanon right now is merely the latest flare-up in a war
>> against western civilisation that has been going on for 1400 years.

>You are among the few who understand this.

Actually this feud has been going on since the days of Abraham.


--

Stop Repeat Offenders!
Don't Re-elect Them!
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084722 ] Sat, 15 July 2006 17:09
Notifier Deamon  
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084732 ] Sat, 15 July 2006 17:20
kitekrazy  
"grativo" <grativo [at] aol.com> wrote in
news:1152907110.161415.3360 [at] p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com:

>> The whole reason for the protracted conflict is that neither side has
>> the guts to commit to what needs to be done even though the writing's
>> on the wall. Pitiful suicide bombings and kidnappings, or "ferocious"
>> responses leaving infrastructure and civilization intact are not
>> going to do it.
>
> I think Israelies have shown more guts, because they're saying they're
> not opposed to living beside some kind of a palestinian state.<


Only because of pressure from the outside world. Interesting that no one
in the Middle East wants the Palestinians.
Re: Complaining About the "ferocity" of the Israeli response... [message #1084796 ] Sat, 15 July 2006 19:03
TUKA  
On 2006-07-15, Tim McGaughy <teekem [at] ispwest.com> wrote:
> Bob wrote:
>> On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 19:36:04 -0500, Tim McGaughy <teekem [at] ispwest.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>But while they're doing it, they need to leave the innocent civilians
>>>the fuck alone.
>>
>>
>> The terrorists force civilians into combat areas - human shields. The
>> only response is to kill them along with the terrorists.
>
> No.
>
> Terrorists don't spend 24 hours a day hiding behind hostages.

Don't bother Bob, the boy has no understanding of the world and
how it works. Otherwise he wouldn't be demanding surgical
attacks on will o' the wisps.

--

Fast, reliable, cheap. Pick two and we'll talk. -- unknown
Vorheriges Thema:tna still isn't must see tv
Nächstes Thema:Cowboys Safety Shot on Dallas Highway
Gehe zu:
  


aktuelle Zeit: Wed Jan 7 17:56:30 CET 2009

Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0.27883 Sekunden
.:: Startseite - Hinweise - Impressum ::.

Powered