|
Sports » rec.sport.football.college » Lies, damned lies...
| Re: Lies, damned lies... [message #761318 ] |
Di, 20 Dezember 2005 17:21 |
|
J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
> On 19 Dec 2005 11:43:59 -0800, "Themudo" <fThemudo [at] gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
> >> On 19 Dec 2005 10:43:51 -0800, "Themudo" <fThemudo [at] gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
> >> >> On 14 Dec 2005 18:50:48 -0800, fThemudo [at] gmail.com wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
> >> >> >> On 12 Dec 2005 11:20:16 -0800, "Themudo" <fThemudo [at] gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >> The contradictions were on purpose to show that most gains were
> >> >> >> accompanied by losses. Sorry you missed it.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >You just made that up.
> >> >>
> >> >> I guess your grasp of the obvious is not as obvious as I thought.
> >> >
> >> >Nice little word game here. You seem to be good at those. Are they
> >> >enough to convice you? Maybe you should try a more sofisticated one
> >> >just in case you start questioning all the bs you spout
> >> >>
> >> >> >i'm glad those moral cookies they gave still make you wiggle your tail.
> >> >> >You're a lackey trying to justify a life of servitude. You think like a
> >> >> >lackey
> >> >>
> >> >> If I am you are a lackey's "boy".
> >> >>
> >> >> I've had almost 19 years of GREAT retirement because of that
> >> >> "servitude". But, based on the number of organizations I have chaired
> >> >> or presided over, I'd label it a life of service. The choice was aways
> >> >> mine, not someone else's - except the company required managers to be
> >> >> a JA Advisor for 1 year so I gave them 2.
> >> >
> >> >Yes yes, of course you did. At $1.70 an hour right?
> >>
> >> Nope.
> >>
> >> >Oh right! you
> >> >became a president some years afterwards ...
> >>
> >> Nope.
> >>
> >> >I wonder what you're going to come up with next.
> >>
> >> Just the facts, maam.
> >
> >reeeeally!!
> >
> >let me quote you:
> >
> >"I wasn't a slave, I wasn't exploited and I started at about $1.15 per
> >hour and we lived pretty well. I went to work with a corporation 2
> >years later for about $1.70 per hour. And I retired at age 59.
> >Liberals and the union boosted the wage and drove the jobs out of the
> >country. You people just can't handle life."
> >
> >You really do have a memory problem
>
> You response made it appear that you believed I had done the 19 years
> and JA at $1.70 per hour. When you attempted to be facetious you were
> imbecilic.
Again this wonderful wordplay.
I also said you became a president after that time. You denied it. So,
which of the many versions of your wonderful and successful life are
you going to stick with? Can you actually distinguish between what you
really went through and what you simply made up? You know how it is
when one gets on in years ...
>
> Get help to keep up with the conversation.
You're not that good. Besides, I'm enjoying it the way it is.
Chico
>Better yet pick up your dolls and go home.
>
> Hugh
|
|
|
| Re: Lies, damned lies... [message #761343 ] |
Di, 20 Dezember 2005 18:42 |
|
On 20 Dec 2005 08:21:33 -0800, "Themudo" <fThemudo [at] gmail.com> wrote:
>
>J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>> On 19 Dec 2005 11:43:59 -0800, "Themudo" <fThemudo [at] gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>> >> On 19 Dec 2005 10:43:51 -0800, "Themudo" <fThemudo [at] gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>> >> >> On 14 Dec 2005 18:50:48 -0800, fThemudo [at] gmail.com wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
>> >> >> >> On 12 Dec 2005 11:20:16 -0800, "Themudo" <fThemudo [at] gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >> The contradictions were on purpose to show that most gains were
>> >> >> >> accompanied by losses. Sorry you missed it.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >You just made that up.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I guess your grasp of the obvious is not as obvious as I thought.
>> >> >
>> >> >Nice little word game here. You seem to be good at those. Are they
>> >> >enough to convice you? Maybe you should try a more sofisticated one
>> >> >just in case you start questioning all the bs you spout
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >i'm glad those moral cookies they gave still make you wiggle your tail.
>> >> >> >You're a lackey trying to justify a life of servitude. You think like a
>> >> >> >lackey
>> >> >>
>> >> >> If I am you are a lackey's "boy".
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I've had almost 19 years of GREAT retirement because of that
>> >> >> "servitude". But, based on the number of organizations I have chaired
>> >> >> or presided over, I'd label it a life of service. The choice was aways
>> >> >> mine, not someone else's - except the company required managers to be
>> >> >> a JA Advisor for 1 year so I gave them 2.
>> >> >
>> >> >Yes yes, of course you did. At $1.70 an hour right?
>> >>
>> >> Nope.
>> >>
>> >> >Oh right! you
>> >> >became a president some years afterwards ...
>> >>
>> >> Nope.
>> >>
>> >> >I wonder what you're going to come up with next.
>> >>
>> >> Just the facts, maam.
>> >
>> >reeeeally!!
>> >
>> >let me quote you:
>> >
>> >"I wasn't a slave, I wasn't exploited and I started at about $1.15 per
>> >hour and we lived pretty well. I went to work with a corporation 2
>> >years later for about $1.70 per hour. And I retired at age 59.
>> >Liberals and the union boosted the wage and drove the jobs out of the
>> >country. You people just can't handle life."
>> >
>> >You really do have a memory problem
>>
>> You response made it appear that you believed I had done the 19 years
>> and JA at $1.70 per hour. When you attempted to be facetious you were
>> imbecilic.
>
>Again this wonderful wordplay.
>
>I also said you became a president after that time. You denied it. So,
>which of the many versions of your wonderful and successful life are
>you going to stick with? Can you actually distinguish between what you
>really went through and what you simply made up? You know how it is
>when one gets on in years ...
You drew a conclusion that I became President. I was President or
Chair of numerous organizations but never of the company I worked for
at $1.70 per hour. You read something into what I said. I would not
even make the attempt to interpret what you erroneously presume.
Yes, I know how it is when one gets on in years - he has a quite
lengthy resume and turns down a lot of requests to become involved in
the operation of a number of programs.
>> Get help to keep up with the conversation.
>
>You're not that good. Besides, I'm enjoying it the way it is.
Oh, I'm not conversing, I'm telling you.
I declare school in recess. Adios el nino, Chico.
Hugh
|
|
|
| Re: Lies, damned lies... [message #761355 ] |
Di, 20 Dezember 2005 19:13 |
|
J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
> On 20 Dec 2005 08:21:33 -0800, "Themudo" <fThemudo [at] gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
> >> On 19 Dec 2005 11:43:59 -0800, "Themudo" <fThemudo [at] gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
> >> >> On 19 Dec 2005 10:43:51 -0800, "Themudo" <fThemudo [at] gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
> >> >> >> On 14 Dec 2005 18:50:48 -0800, fThemudo [at] gmail.com wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
> >> >> >> >> On 12 Dec 2005 11:20:16 -0800, "Themudo" <fThemudo [at] gmail.com> wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> The contradictions were on purpose to show that most gains were
> >> >> >> >> accompanied by losses. Sorry you missed it.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >You just made that up.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I guess your grasp of the obvious is not as obvious as I thought.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Nice little word game here. You seem to be good at those. Are they
> >> >> >enough to convice you? Maybe you should try a more sofisticated one
> >> >> >just in case you start questioning all the bs you spout
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >i'm glad those moral cookies they gave still make you wiggle your tail.
> >> >> >> >You're a lackey trying to justify a life of servitude. You think like a
> >> >> >> >lackey
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> If I am you are a lackey's "boy".
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> I've had almost 19 years of GREAT retirement because of that
> >> >> >> "servitude". But, based on the number of organizations I have chaired
> >> >> >> or presided over, I'd label it a life of service. The choice was aways
> >> >> >> mine, not someone else's - except the company required managers to be
> >> >> >> a JA Advisor for 1 year so I gave them 2.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Yes yes, of course you did. At $1.70 an hour right?
> >> >>
> >> >> Nope.
> >> >>
> >> >> >Oh right! you
> >> >> >became a president some years afterwards ...
> >> >>
> >> >> Nope.
> >> >>
> >> >> >I wonder what you're going to come up with next.
> >> >>
> >> >> Just the facts, maam.
> >> >
> >> >reeeeally!!
> >> >
> >> >let me quote you:
> >> >
> >> >"I wasn't a slave, I wasn't exploited and I started at about $1.15 per
> >> >hour and we lived pretty well. I went to work with a corporation 2
> >> >years later for about $1.70 per hour. And I retired at age 59.
> >> >Liberals and the union boosted the wage and drove the jobs out of the
> >> >country. You people just can't handle life."
> >> >
> >> >You really do have a memory problem
> >>
> >> You response made it appear that you believed I had done the 19 years
> >> and JA at $1.70 per hour. When you attempted to be facetious you were
> >> imbecilic.
> >
> >Again this wonderful wordplay.
> >
> >I also said you became a president after that time. You denied it. So,
> >which of the many versions of your wonderful and successful life are
> >you going to stick with? Can you actually distinguish between what you
> >really went through and what you simply made up? You know how it is
> >when one gets on in years ...
>
> You drew a conclusion that I became President. I was President or
> Chair of numerous organizations but never of the company I worked for
> at $1.70 per hour.
That was not implicit in what I said. You're just interpreting it that
way because it suits your lies.
>You read something into what I said. I would not
> even make the attempt to interpret what you erroneously presume.
Of course you wouldn't. You're too important a person to waste your
time having silly arguments in newsgroups
>
> Yes, I know how it is when one gets on in years - he has a quite
> lengthy resume and turns down a lot of requests to become involved in
> the operation of a number of programs.
Now you're delusional. Who'd want you at 78
>
> >> Get help to keep up with the conversation.
> >
> >You're not that good. Besides, I'm enjoying it the way it is.
>
> Oh, I'm not conversing, I'm telling you.
You're the one who called it a conversation (Damn that memory again)
>
> I declare school in recess.
Wow! what a great exit. Very theatrical.
>Adios el nino, Chico.
Não falo espanhol.
Adeus e até à próxima
Chico
>
> Hugh
|
|
|
| Re: Lies, damned lies... [message #761376 ] |
Di, 20 Dezember 2005 19:57 |
|
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 23:39:46 GMT,
J. Hugh Sullivan <sull1927 [at] adelphia.net> wrote:
> On 19 Dec 2005 22:37:37 GMT, AC <mightymartianca [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>I think the real explanation here is that you can't answer the questions, or
>>you know damn well that the answers have nothing to do with science. That's
>>alright, but it would be better to admit it than to pretend that being an
>>asshole somehow makes you look like the winner at the end of the day. I for
>>one know perfectly well that your attempt to make your religious beliefs
>>into some sort of actual history can only end in one way.
>>
>>--
>>Aaron Clausen
>>mightymartianca [at] hotmail.com
>
> It must be nice to be omniscient. But it's plain stupid to think you
> are.
And that's why I'll go where the physical evidence goes.
>
> We won't know who the winner is until we die. I won't need good luck
> but you might.
Well, I've never been one for Pascal's Wager myself. Too many ways to go
wrong. I figure Pluto won't be too pissed if I didn't leave anything at the
temple of Zeus.
--
Aaron Clausen
mightymartianca [at] hotmail.com
|
|
|
| Re: Lies, damned lies... [message #761434 ] |
Di, 20 Dezember 2005 22:06 |
|
J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
> On 19 Dec 2005 16:07:17 -0800, "Ken Shackleton"
> <ken.shackleton [at] shaw.ca> wrote:
>
> >
> >J. Hugh Sullivan wrote:
> >> On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 15:40:19 GMT, Matt Silberstein
> >> <RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam [at] ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 14:50:10 GMT, in talk.origins ,
> >> >sull1927 [at] adelphia.net (J. Hugh Sullivan) in
> >> ><43a2d2b9.5774042 [at] news1.news.adelphia.net> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>On Fri, 16 Dec 2005 06:25:36 GMT, Matt Silberstein
> >> >><RemoveThisPrefixmatts2nospam [at] ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>>On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 20:31:10 GMT, in talk.origins ,
> >> >>>sull1927 [at] adelphia.net (J. Hugh Sullivan) in
> >> >>><4399e93f.24710151 [at] news1.news.adelphia.net> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>[snip]
> >> >>
> >> >>>>I can't speak for others but what makes you think you can support my
> >> >>>>lifestyle?
> >> >>>
> >> >>>I am talking about the long term massive tax subsidy sent from the
> >> >>>Northeast to the South.
> >> >>
> >> >>It's war reparations and the cost of civil rights.
> >> >
> >> >ROTLFMAO.
> >> >
> >> >>And I believe the extremely high tax rates in the northeast are
> >> >>deductible from federal tax, are they not? That's quite a subsidy.
> >> >
> >> >And is rather irrelevant. Learn the notion of net vs. gross. The
> >> >Northeast sends tax money to the South. Deductibility is rather
> >> >irrelevant to that.
> >>
> >> There is a reason for that. Before the War of Northern Aggression the
> >> vast majority of the 100 richest men in the country were Southerners
> >> and that was intolerable to the north. As a result of the rape of the
> >> South the north achieved the upper hand. That's in spite of our
> >> killing almost twice as many of you as you did of us.
> >
> >No....Secession from the Union was intolerable to the North. Slavery
> >was also intolerable to the North. The Northern economy, with its
> >industrial base, had the upper hand from the beginning. The South, with
> >its agrarian based economy....was doomed from the beginning.
> >
> >He who can build guns and cannons fastest wins.
> >
> >If you Southerners want to delude yourselves into believing that
> >jealousy was the motive....go right ahead.
> >
> >It is interesting that you can use "war reparations" as an excuse for
> >receiving welfare and other social assistance programs while
> >simultaneously decrying the system that supports said programs.
> >
> >>
> >> So, through your generosity you are doing your best to make amends for
> >> your misdeeds. If not for deductability you could be making
> >> reparations much faster. Even better you could move those needing the
> >> subsidy (you freed their ancestors) to the north and we would have to
> >> support you. It was right to free them but it's not right to crow
> >> about having to support their descendants.
> >
> >If the descendants of white slavers did not actively work to keep the
> >descendants of black slaves in economic poverty for more than 100 years
> >since they had been freed....perhaps the North would not have to keep
> >the South on welfare. Perhaps the North should place a surtax on the
> >heads of the descendants of the white slavers and give those dollars
> >directly to the descendants of the enslaved!
> >
> >You are so full of shit with your self-righteous poor-me Southern
> >hypocracy.
> >
> >>
> >> Hugh
> >
> Ill give you one piece of advice and then I'm gone.When you go to the
> bathroom write your weight on the wall, In case you fall in someone
> might want to know how much to dip out.
Now there's an intelligent rebuttal.....pun intended.
>
> Hugh
|
|
|
| Re: Lies, damned lies... [message #761474 ] |
Di, 20 Dezember 2005 23:32 |
|
On 20 Dec 2005 13:06:23 -0800,
Ken Shackleton <ken.shackleton [at] shaw.ca> wrote:
>
>> >
>> Ill give you one piece of advice and then I'm gone.When you go to the
>> bathroom write your weight on the wall, In case you fall in someone
>> might want to know how much to dip out.
>
> Now there's an intelligent rebuttal.....pun intended.
This fellow does seem to run towards this sort of response rather quickly.
His intellectual reserves are easily exhausted.
--
Aaron Clausen
mightymartianca [at] hotmail.com
|
|
|
Gehe zu:
aktuelle Zeit: Sa Mär 13 19:39:45 CET 2010
Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0,14031 Sekunden |
