|
Sports » rec.sport.soccer » Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088301 ] |
Fri, 21 July 2006 06:58 |
|
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 21:34:55 +0200, anders t
<anthu_001 [at] No€SPaM€_hotmail.com> wrote:
>Quoting Goldmund in rec.sport.soccer:
>
>>So in sweden if you insult somebody and the other reacts hitting you,
>>it's in his rights, all in all you have to expect it.
>>Good, I will remember to bring an helmet when I come to sweden.
>
>We hate bullying instigators. Peace disturbers.
Good, me too
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088313 ] |
Fri, 21 July 2006 09:28 |
|
On 2006-07-21 14:53:58 +1000, Goldmund <user [at] provider.com> said:
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 21:42:46 +0200, firstname [at] lastname.net (Florian)
> wrote:
>
>> Goldmund <user [at] provider.com> wrote:
>>
>>> So in sweden if you insult somebody and the other reacts hitting you,
>>> it's in his rights, all in all you have to expect it.
>>
>> No. Both him and you will be punished. Wasn't that the case for ZZ-MM?
>
> 3-2 is not an equal punishment, it's pretty evident.
> and it's a clear message by Fifa, since Zidane has retired anyway, a 5
> match ban would have had no effect, but this is a giant excuse to
> recover the mess he made in his last match, to make him appear a
> victim and let him go among the saints of football.
I call it FIFA corruption. This sets one hell of a precedent. I am
waiting for clubs to take matters to court in the next round.
This all comes down to one man though. Blatter. The con fo world
football needs to be eliminated for the good of the game.
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088316 ] |
Fri, 21 July 2006 09:43 |
|
"Goldmund" <user [at] provider.com> wrote in message
news:8bn0c2180jgh4798k4dp39660da8999b75 [at] 4ax.com...
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 21:42:46 +0200, firstname [at] lastname.net (Florian)
> wrote:
>
> >Goldmund <user [at] provider.com> wrote:
> >
> >> So in sweden if you insult somebody and the other reacts hitting you,
> >> it's in his rights, all in all you have to expect it.
> >
> >No. Both him and you will be punished. Wasn't that the case for ZZ-MM?
>
> 3-2 is not an equal punishment, it's pretty evident.
> and it's a clear message by Fifa, since Zidane has retired anyway, a 5
> match ban would have had no effect, but this is a giant excuse to
> recover the mess he made in his last match, to make him appear a
> victim and let him go among the saints of football.
That's what this is about, to make Zidane look like the victim so it doesn't
tarnish his career.
Laughable Stupidity.
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088317 ] |
Fri, 21 July 2006 09:44 |
|
"anders t" <anthu_001 [at] No?SPaM?_hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:lhpvb2hh1rcc5d5r4hnp92tu919b7fl0q9 [at] 4ax.com...
> Quoting LeGar in rec.sport.soccer:
> >
> >anders t wrote:
> >> Quoting LeGar in rec.sport.soccer:
> >>
> >> >I thought the Swedes had matured a little since my golden years in
> >> >Stockholm, but alas, no. The criminal still gets all the sympathy.
> >>
> >> You sympathize with the one who provokes and instigates violence.
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> >Materazzi? No way, he´s a thug and always was a disgrace to football.
> >But he should not be punished for some silly verbal insults, something
> >most of the players do most of the time. Reprimanded maybe, but not
> >punished. L
>
> As I was saying.
>
> Btw: apparently it wasn't Materazzi's everyday insults.
Big Fucking Deal!
He wasn't racist, so what was the problem?
He called his sister a whore?
LOL! Hardly an insult for a headbutt.
Laughable.
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088320 ] |
Fri, 21 July 2006 09:44 |
|
I'd like to know what would have been the penalty if Materazzi hitted
Zidane. I'm sure he would have gotten at least 8 matches, and Zidane
would have been sanctified.
It's a shame.
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088331 ] |
Fri, 21 July 2006 12:28 |
|
Goldmund <user [at] provider.com> writes:
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 19:46:03 +0100, Rolleston <Nemo [at] nullsome.net>
> wrote:
>
>>Goldmund <user [at] provider.com> writes:
>>> So in sweden if you insult somebody and the other reacts hitting you,
>>> it's in his rights, all in all you have to expect it.
>>> Good, I will remember to bring an helmet when I come to sweden.
>>
>>You're anticipating insulting people there?
>
> I'm not insulting the swedes, they are nice people, I'm just
> translating the poll (whose reliability is to be checked btw): you
> insult somebody and you get beaten and the the proportion of your
> punishemnt is 2/3 of who beated you: too mild says the poll. So...
So... you don't insult anyone, they don't attack you, and everyone's
happy :)
R.
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088333 ] |
Fri, 21 July 2006 13:02 |
|
anders t wrote:
> Quoting Futbolmetrix in rec.sport.soccer:
> >
> ><nmdc69 [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:1153402146.877894.139350 [at] m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
> >> You heard it here first.
> >
> >Materazzi banned for two competitive matches.
> >
> >September 2: Italy - Estonia(?)
> >September 6: France - Italy
> >
> >How convenient.
>
> More than 57% of ~33000 poll takers for Swedish Aftonbladet thinks
> Materazzi got away too easy.
>
> ZIDANE (35757 votes):
> Too mild 26.5% - 39.6% Too harsh
> (Just right 33.9%)
>
> MATERAZZI (32758 votes):
> Too mild 57.4% - 25.0% Too harsh
> (Just right 17.6%)
>
>
nobody cares what the Swedes think.
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088345 ] |
Fri, 21 July 2006 14:25 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088346 ] |
Fri, 21 July 2006 14:27 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088347 ] |
Fri, 21 July 2006 14:30 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088355 ] |
Fri, 21 July 2006 15:34 |
|
Diabolik wrote:
> "anders t" <anthu_001 [at] No?SPaM?_hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:lhpvb2hh1rcc5d5r4hnp92tu919b7fl0q9 [at] 4ax.com...
> > Quoting LeGar in rec.sport.soccer:
> > >
> > >anders t wrote:
> > >> Quoting LeGar in rec.sport.soccer:
> > >>
> > >> >I thought the Swedes had matured a little since my golden years in
> > >> >Stockholm, but alas, no. The criminal still gets all the sympathy.
> > >>
> > >> You sympathize with the one who provokes and instigates violence.
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > >Materazzi? No way, he=B4s a thug and always was a disgrace to football.
> > >But he should not be punished for some silly verbal insults, something
> > >most of the players do most of the time. Reprimanded maybe, but not
> > >punished. L
> >
> > As I was saying.
> >
> > Btw: apparently it wasn't Materazzi's everyday insults.
>
> Big Fucking Deal!
>
> He wasn't racist, so what was the problem?
>
> He called his sister a whore?
> LOL! Hardly an insult for a headbutt.
>
> Laughable.
Would you call your own sister this way? Give it a try. And let us know
if she enjoy it.
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088371 ] |
Fri, 21 July 2006 17:30 |
|
zidane?a animal..
blatter e platini no comment...
SHUSSBAR ha scritto:
> Diabolik wrote:
> > "anders t" <anthu_001 [at] No?SPaM?_hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:lhpvb2hh1rcc5d5r4hnp92tu919b7fl0q9 [at] 4ax.com...
> > > Quoting LeGar in rec.sport.soccer:
> > > >
> > > >anders t wrote:
> > > >> Quoting LeGar in rec.sport.soccer:
> > > >>
> > > >> >I thought the Swedes had matured a little since my golden years in
> > > >> >Stockholm, but alas, no. The criminal still gets all the sympathy.
> > > >>
> > > >> You sympathize with the one who provokes and instigates violence.
> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > >
> > > >Materazzi? No way, he=B4s a thug and always was a disgrace to footba=
ll.
> > > >But he should not be punished for some silly verbal insults, somethi=
ng
> > > >most of the players do most of the time. Reprimanded maybe, but not
> > > >punished. L
> > >
> > > As I was saying.
> > >
> > > Btw: apparently it wasn't Materazzi's everyday insults.
> >
> > Big Fucking Deal!
> >
> > He wasn't racist, so what was the problem?
> >
> > He called his sister a whore?
> > LOL! Hardly an insult for a headbutt.
> >
> > Laughable.
>
> Would you call your own sister this way? Give it a try. And let us know
> if she enjoy it.
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088380 ] |
Fri, 21 July 2006 17:54 |
|
"SHUSSBAR" <SHUSSBAR [at] gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1153488881.652624.267680 [at] s13g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Diabolik wrote:
> "anders t" <anthu_001 [at] No?SPaM?_hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:lhpvb2hh1rcc5d5r4hnp92tu919b7fl0q9 [at] 4ax.com...
> > Quoting LeGar in rec.sport.soccer:
> > >
> > >anders t wrote:
> > >> Quoting LeGar in rec.sport.soccer:
> > >>
> > >> >I thought the Swedes had matured a little since my golden years in
> > >> >Stockholm, but alas, no. The criminal still gets all the sympathy.
> > >>
> > >> You sympathize with the one who provokes and instigates violence.
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> >
> > >Materazzi? No way, he´s a thug and always was a disgrace to football.
> > >But he should not be punished for some silly verbal insults, something
> > >most of the players do most of the time. Reprimanded maybe, but not
> > >punished. L
> >
> > As I was saying.
> >
> > Btw: apparently it wasn't Materazzi's everyday insults.
>
> Big Fucking Deal!
>
> He wasn't racist, so what was the problem?
>
> He called his sister a whore?
> LOL! Hardly an insult for a headbutt.
>
> Laughable.
> Would you call your own sister this way? Give it a try. And let us know
> if she enjoy it.
No, but I wouldn't headbutt someone for it.
It's absurd.
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088392 ] |
Fri, 21 July 2006 18:49 |
|
anders t wrote:
> Quoting mg in rec.sport.soccer:
> >
> >I'd like to know what would have been the penalty if Materazzi hitted
> >Zidane.
>
> Why? Because Zidane promised him to get his shirt after the game?
>
> >I'm sure he would have gotten at least 8 matches, and Zidane
> >would have been sanctified.
>
> Yeah, for that I'm sure 8 games would have been about right.
>
> >It's a shame.
>
> And all on Materazzi.
>
>
>
> --
it's obvious that the poster meant "what if the role of the two players
was completely
reversed". Hint: Zidane says bad words, Materazzi headbutts. What do
you think
the punishments would have been?
[My guess: Materazzi 6-months out, Zidane unpunished.]
While you're at it, was De Rossi's fault (5 days suspension) worse
than
Zidane's (3 days fake suspension)?
let's see how honest Zidane's lovers can be.
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088419 ] |
Fri, 21 July 2006 21:04 |
|
Diabolik wrote:
> "SHUSSBAR" <SHUSSBAR [at] gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1153488881.652624.267680 [at] s13g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> Diabolik wrote:
> > "anders t" <anthu_001 [at] No?SPaM?_hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:lhpvb2hh1rcc5d5r4hnp92tu919b7fl0q9 [at] 4ax.com...
> > > Quoting LeGar in rec.sport.soccer:
> > > >
> > > >anders t wrote:
> > > >> Quoting LeGar in rec.sport.soccer:
> > > >>
> > > >> >I thought the Swedes had matured a little since my golden years in
> > > >> >Stockholm, but alas, no. The criminal still gets all the sympathy.
> > > >>
> > > >> You sympathize with the one who provokes and instigates violence.
> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > >
> > > >Materazzi? No way, he=B4s a thug and always was a disgrace to footba=
ll.
> > > >But he should not be punished for some silly verbal insults, somethi=
ng
> > > >most of the players do most of the time. Reprimanded maybe, but not
> > > >punished. L
> > >
> > > As I was saying.
> > >
> > > Btw: apparently it wasn't Materazzi's everyday insults.
> >
> > Big Fucking Deal!
> >
> > He wasn't racist, so what was the problem?
> >
> > He called his sister a whore?
> > LOL! Hardly an insult for a headbutt.
> >
> > Laughable.
>
> > Would you call your own sister this way? Give it a try. And let us know
> > if she enjoy it.
>
> No, but I wouldn't headbutt someone for it.
> It's absurd.
SHE might headbutt you ,grab your balls and twist them
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088438 ] |
Fri, 21 July 2006 23:11 |
|
anders t wrote:
> Italians fear the the Materazzi verdict because it threatens one of the
> specialities they use in order to win games.
What evidence do you have that they use it more than any other team,
given that we can't hear and follow what goes on off the ball ?
And how do you see this being enforced ?
I mean, I am in agreement that rules already exist saying that foul,
abusive and insulting language can be penalized with a red card, and I
would have no trouble if refs started to take that more seriously.
It is quite clear to me that players are using words they shouldn't be,
even in addressing the refs.
But the problem is that refs can't penalise what they can't hear (or
understand, as there can also be a language issue). And trying to do
the enforcement after games by interrogating witnesses, none of whom
will be unbiased, just doesn't make sense to me.
Also where do you draw the line as to what is acceptable ? Do you make
up a list analogous to George Carlin's sketch "Seven words you cannot
say on TV" (an old sketch - I have heard every one of them on TV since
then) ? Can you call an opponent a Swine ? a Pig ? A wanker ? A
reprobate ? A cad ? A bastard ? As the Guardian article suggests,
FIFA have opened a giant can of worms with this.
Finally the implication that Materazzi "must have said something really
bad, because Zidane reacted" is spurious, since Zidane has a history of
indiscipline, and we'll never know exactly what was said.
And as I have said before , what about all other incidences of
provocation ? Do we now go back and suspend Van Bommel "a character
every bit as unsavoury as Materazzi on the pitch" for whatever he said
to Figo ? How about van der Saar for his confrontation with Ortega in
1998 (also a head butt incident, and not as forceful as Zidane's) ?
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088460 ] |
Sat, 22 July 2006 02:10 |
|
anders t <anthu_001 [at] No€SPaM€_hotmail.com> wrote:
>Quoting AlanS in rec.sport.soccer:
>>I was just thinking of that. Swedes, otherwise decent, are rather
>>naive when it comes to recognizing and dealing with criminals,
>>possibly due to an egotistical sense of democracy. As a result of a
>>knee-jerk assumption that anybody fleeing from lesser democracies or
>>regimes must be victims, Sweden has become a safe haven for criminals
>>from the third world.
>Yeah, we should shoot more people and invade more countries.
You don't have to go to the other extreme. Optimum usually is
somewhere in between.
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088461 ] |
Sat, 22 July 2006 02:19 |
|
"SHUSSBAR" <SHUSSBAR [at] gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1153508652.578905.190880 [at] b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
Diabolik wrote:
> "SHUSSBAR" <SHUSSBAR [at] gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1153488881.652624.267680 [at] s13g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> Diabolik wrote:
> > "anders t" <anthu_001 [at] No?SPaM?_hotmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:lhpvb2hh1rcc5d5r4hnp92tu919b7fl0q9 [at] 4ax.com...
> > > Quoting LeGar in rec.sport.soccer:
> > > >
> > > >anders t wrote:
> > > >> Quoting LeGar in rec.sport.soccer:
> > > >>
> > > >> >I thought the Swedes had matured a little since my golden years in
> > > >> >Stockholm, but alas, no. The criminal still gets all the sympathy.
> > > >>
> > > >> You sympathize with the one who provokes and instigates violence.
> > > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > >
> > > >Materazzi? No way, he´s a thug and always was a disgrace to football.
> > > >But he should not be punished for some silly verbal insults,
something
> > > >most of the players do most of the time. Reprimanded maybe, but not
> > > >punished. L
> > >
> > > As I was saying.
> > >
> > > Btw: apparently it wasn't Materazzi's everyday insults.
> >
> > Big Fucking Deal!
> >
> > He wasn't racist, so what was the problem?
> >
> > He called his sister a whore?
> > LOL! Hardly an insult for a headbutt.
> >
> > Laughable.
>
> > Would you call your own sister this way? Give it a try. And let us know
> > if she enjoy it.
>
> No, but I wouldn't headbutt someone for it.
> It's absurd.
SHE might headbutt you ,grab your balls and twist them
Zidane's sister?
She must be an animal.
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088485 ] |
Sat, 22 July 2006 08:18 |
|
On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 14:25:43 +0200, anders t
<anthu_001 [at] No€SPaM€_hotmail.com> wrote:
>Italians fear the the Materazzi verdict because it threatens one of the
>specialities they use in order to win games.
Anders' bullshitometer
+++++++++++++++++
^
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088489 ] |
Sat, 22 July 2006 08:56 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088490 ] |
Sat, 22 July 2006 08:57 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088494 ] |
Sat, 22 July 2006 09:20 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088505 ] |
Sat, 22 July 2006 13:31 |
|
MH <nospam [at] ucalgary.ca> did this:
> Also where do you draw the line as to what is acceptable ? Do you make
> up a list analogous to George Carlin's sketch "Seven words you cannot
> say on TV" (an old sketch - I have heard every one of them on TV since
> then) ? Can you call an opponent a Swine ? a Pig ? A wanker ? A
> reprobate ? A cad ? A bastard ? As the Guardian article suggests,
> FIFA have opened a giant can of worms with this.
That is an interesting question. For example, to maintain consistency,
shouldn't players and coaches who do the international hand signal for
diving be given suspensions? The FIFA laws cover gestures just as well
as language and surely alledging that an athlete cheated is insulting.
Why is this never punished? Would it be punished if the player accused
of cheating headbutted his accuser?
--
Ari <fun.no [at] all.at>
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088510 ] |
Sat, 22 July 2006 14:21 |
|
"anders t" <anthu_001 [at] No?SPaM?_hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:iui3c212l9ic0i7bnds3jr6f9ppt20f81l [at] 4ax.com...
> Quoting Diabolik in rec.sport.soccer:
>
> >> > Would you call your own sister this way? Give it a try. And let us
know
> >> > if she enjoy it.
> >>
> >> No, but I wouldn't headbutt someone for it.
> >> It's absurd.
> >
> >SHE might headbutt you ,grab your balls and twist them
> >
> >Zidane's sister?
> >She must be an animal.
>
> You are Zidane's brother?
I find it amusing how you defend Zidane's actions.
Keep going...
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088511 ] |
Sat, 22 July 2006 14:16 |
|
"Florian" <firstname [at] lastname.net> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:1hisn74.1rrw0ti1dw5na1N%firstname [at] lastname.net...
> <bellavalle [at] email.it> wrote:
>
>> Materazzi is a champion, he scored in the final. Blatter refused to
>> reward italy after the match: this is a scandal. It explains why they
>> punished materazzi.
>
> A scandal is what currently happens in Serie A. Period.
>
No way. The scandal is what happened from 1994 on. Nowadays we're starting
to have some waste disposed.. and we're are the full-deserved Champions
despite FIFA: all things to be proud of.
What happened to Zidane, the ashaming punishment of Materazzi or Blatter
avoiding to reward Italy are symptoms of hard teeth-grinding for our
victory, which makes its taste even sweeter.
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088549 ] |
Sat, 22 July 2006 23:38 |
|
affory <ifc [at] m.i> wrote:
> > A scandal is what currently happens in Serie A. Period.
> >
>
> No way [...]
I see. Cheating in Seria A is not a scandal. It is PERFECTLY normal...
Actually, we knew that, didn't we?
--
Florian
"Tout est au mieux dans le meilleure des mondes possible"
Voltaire vs Leibniz
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088579 ] |
Sun, 23 July 2006 03:33 |
|
"Florian" <firstname [at] lastname.net> wrote in message
news:1hiw9wn.a11cp57iqzN%firstname [at] lastname.net...
> affory <ifc [at] m.i> wrote:
>
> > > A scandal is what currently happens in Serie A. Period.
> > >
> >
> > No way [...]
>
> I see. Cheating in Seria A is not a scandal. It is PERFECTLY normal...
> Actually, we knew that, didn't we?
Is it normal to headbutt in the French league?
I thought actions like that were reserved to thugs?
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088592 ] |
Sun, 23 July 2006 05:19 |
|
On 2006-07-21 22:25:43 +1000, anders t <anthu_001 [at] No€SPaM€_hotmail.com> said:
> Italians fear the the Materazzi verdict because it threatens one of the
> specialities they use in order to win games.
Troll.
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088598 ] |
Sun, 23 July 2006 06:11 |
|
anders t <anthu_001 [at] No€SPaM€_hotmail.com> wrote:
>Quoting AlanS in rec.sport.soccer:
>>anders t <anthu_001 [at] No€SPaM€_hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>Quoting AlanS in rec.sport.soccer:
>>>>I was just thinking of that. Swedes, otherwise decent, are rather
>>>>naive when it comes to recognizing and dealing with criminals,
>>>>possibly due to an egotistical sense of democracy. As a result of a
>>>>knee-jerk assumption that anybody fleeing from lesser democracies or
>>>>regimes must be victims, Sweden has become a safe haven for criminals
>>>>from the third world.
>>>Yeah, we should shoot more people and invade more countries.
>>You don't have to go to the other extreme. Optimum usually is
>>somewhere in between.
>Okay, we should shoot a few more people and invade a few more countries.
Since I cannot seem to discourage you from that, I give up. Go ahead.
What I had in mind was, however, simply *not* protecting and providing
amnesty to every criminal who plays the victim of society or regime
card.
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088608 ] |
Sun, 23 July 2006 09:37 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088609 ] |
Sun, 23 July 2006 09:38 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088617 ] |
Sun, 23 July 2006 11:19 |
|
firstname [at] lastname.net (Florian) did this:
> affory <ifc [at] m.i> wrote:
>
> > > A scandal is what currently happens in Serie A. Period.
> >
> > No way [...]
>
> I see. Cheating in Seria A is not a scandal.
In the part you snipped, affory described the cheating as a scandal:
"The scandal is what happened from 1994 on. Nowadays we're starting to
have some waste disposed.." That's not a defense of cheating; it's the
reasonable point that what is currently happening in Serie A is that
the cheaters are being punished.
--
Ari <fun.no [at] all.at>
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088642 ] |
Sun, 23 July 2006 17:22 |
|
"anders t" <anthu_001 [at] No?SPaM?_hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:jp96c2hmqi6lka45ojqhpu3ds1gokpuvn7 [at] 4ax.com...
> Quoting AlanS in rec.sport.soccer:
>
>>Since I cannot seem to discourage you from that, I give up. Go ahead.
>>
>>What I had in mind was, however, simply *not* protecting and providing
>>amnesty to every criminal who plays the victim of society or regime
>>card.
>
> Okay I plead guilty for living in the possibly most open country in the
> world. Should I feel sorry?
>
Just hope you're never the victim........but if you want to be the criminal
you'll be ok
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088651 ] |
Sun, 23 July 2006 18:39 |
|
Diabolik <diabolik [at] email.it> wrote:
> > I see. Cheating in Seria A is not a scandal. It is PERFECTLY normal...
> > Actually, we knew that, didn't we?
>
> Is it normal to headbutt in the French league?
No. It is punished. It is punished by FIFA. Zidane was punished, as
expected. Everything is normal... But apprently, cheating is perfectly
normal in serie A...
--
Florian
"Tout est au mieux dans le meilleure des mondes possible"
Voltaire vs Leibniz
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088652 ] |
Sun, 23 July 2006 18:55 |
|
anders t <anthu_001 [at] No€SPaM€_hotmail.com> wrote:
>Quoting AlanS in rec.sport.soccer:
>>Since I cannot seem to discourage you from that, I give up. Go ahead.
>>
>>What I had in mind was, however, simply *not* protecting and providing
>>amnesty to every criminal who plays the victim of society or regime
>>card.
>Okay I plead guilty for living in the possibly most open country in the
>world. Should I feel sorry?
Acknowledging that no country is perfect and that there's always room
for improvement is better.
|
|
|
| Re: Fifa verdict: Zidane 3, Materazzi 2 [message #1088684 ] |
Mon, 24 July 2006 00:41 |
|
"Florian" <firstname [at] lastname.net> ha scritto nel messaggio
news:1hiw9wn.a11cp57iqzN%firstname [at] lastname.net...
> affory <ifc [at] m.i> wrote:
>
>> > A scandal is what currently happens in Serie A. Period.
>> >
>>
>> No way [...]
>
> I see. Cheating in Seria A is not a scandal. It is PERFECTLY normal...
> Actually, we knew that, didn't we?
I don't know.
But I bet you didn't know that deserving to lose the Championship with us
(while your national glory shows up to the whole world how fake and rough he
is, ending his career consistently) would hurt so much.
|
|
|
Gehe zu:
aktuelle Zeit: Wed Jan 7 02:35:26 CET 2009
Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0.12076 Sekunden |
